cross cultural variations Flashcards
(14 cards)
who did research into this
Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
aim
look at proportions of attachment types across a range of countries and cultures
procedure
- meta analysis
- summarised results of 32 studies undertaken in 8 countries
each study had used Ainsworth’s ss procedure
findings
- differences between cultures were small
- secure attachment was most common classification
- insecure - avoidant was next most common in all countries except Japan and Israel
conclusions
- pattern of attachment is broadly similar in cultures
- secure attachment is the norm
- supports Bobbly’s theory is innate
Evaluation of Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
1) large sample size included in meta-analysis (increase internal reliability
2) claimed to study cultural variation however differences were between countries not cultures (japan rural and urban)
3) method is culturally biased (imposed etc as you are applying british theory in study by american psychologist)
4) could be an alternate explanations (mass media)
Aim of italian study
to see whether proportions still matched
procedure (italian)
76 infants ages 12 months using ss
findings (italian)
- 50% secure
- 36% insecure-avoidant
- lower rate of secure likely due to increase number of mothers working more hours
conclusions (italian)
suggests patterns of attachment types are not static but vary in line with cultural change
Korean study aim
to compare proportions of attachment types in Korea to other studies
procedure (Korean)
87 infants assessed using ss
findings (Korean)
- most insecurely attached were insecure-resistant
- distribution similar to Japan
conclusions (Korean)
- differences shown could be down to child rearing styles