Dealing with Crime, Part 1: Psychology in prison/community corrections Flashcards

1
Q

Assessment–> Mental health assessment

A
Assessment  case management
Risk of suicide, risk of harm to self/others
Risk of harm FROM others
Risk of reoffending 
Mental illness, mental health needs
Social and emotional wellbeing (++ Indigenous)
Drug and alcohol status
Cognitive function/ability
Fitness to plead or stand trial
Educational/vocational needs
Other intervention needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assessment Methods: Clinical Interviews

A

structured, semi-structured.
Verbal and nonverbal content.
ADL’s.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assessment Methods: Standardised Assessment Tools

A
-Information gathering and assessment: 
    Violence Risk Scale - risk   ax pre-release
-Diagnostic
    PCL-R (Hare, 1980)
-Kits (cognitive testing)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Psychology in Prisons: Reporting

A

Mental health assessments – submitted to courts
Cognitive assessments – submitted to court
Risk assessments– submitted to courts, parole boards
Pre-sentencing report – court. Bigger picture.
Intervention reports – offender’s participation, progress, effectiveness of treatment
Report writing forms a massive part of any psychologist’s workload (!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Treatment/Intervention/Rehabilitation

A

Treatment/Intervention/rehabilitation
-Individual, not always though due to limited resources
-Group sessions – therapy, skills, personal development
-Crisis management – e.g. suicide attempts
-Drug and alcohol
Higher than representative rates of mental illness/intellectual impairment/developmental disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rates of Mental Illness

A

-Figures vary by study/area
-Australian Institute of Health and Wellbeing (2012)
46% some kind of mental illness. 2.5 x pop.
Other studies report more like 80% (Heffernan, Finn, Saunders and Byrne, 2003)
Majority – substance abuse.
40% – personality disorder (Butler & Allnutt, 2003). Around 6% in population - ~7x (ABS 1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Psychopathy

A

-Psychopathy – the extreme end of personality disordered social/behavioural problems.
-Associated with an increased risk for antisocial behaviour, violence and crime
NOT an official diagnostic category in ICD/DSM.
May be a combination of diagnostic criteria from several personality disorders.
-England/Wales (n=496), PCL-R. 7.7% of male prisoners and 1.9% of female.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hare’s Clinical Model: 4 Components of Psychopathy

A
  1. deceitful interpersonal style
  2. affective deficiency
  3. impulsiveness or life- style
  4. antisocial behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hare’s Clincial Model: Factor 1: Interpersonal

A
  1. Glibness/Superficial Charm
  2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
  3. Pathological lying
  4. Cunning/manipulative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hare’ clinical model: Factor 2: Affective

A
  1. Lack of remorse or guilt
  2. Shallow affect
  3. Callous/lack of empathy
  4. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hare’s Clinical Model: Factor 4:Antisocial

A
  1. Poor behavioural controls
  2. Early behavioural problems
  3. Juvenile delinquency
  4. Revocation of conditional release
  5. Criminal Versatility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hare’s Clinical Model: Factor 3: Lifestyle

A
  1. Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
  2. Parasitic lifestyle
  3. Lack of realistic long-term goals
  4. Impulsivity
  5. Irresponsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychopathy in Prisons

A

Pre-valences are higher than in non-forensic and non-psychiatric community samples.
Evidence that it is predictive for recidivism in sexual/violent crimes.
PCL scales included in many structured and actuarial risk assessment/management tools due to predictive utility.
Limited effective treatment options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Groups and Victims

A

Sex offender programs – difficult, few outcome studies
Violent offenders/anger management – high recidivism (40%)
Domestic violence
Cognitive skills – little long term evidence
Drug and alcohol programs
Victim awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mental Health Act [MHA] (2000)

A

For offenders who are mentally ill, courts can place them under forensic orders under the MHA (2000).
Involuntary assessment and treatment.
Usually detained in mental health facility or specialist service e.g. forensic disability.
Usually held for longer under forensic order compared to regular prison sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Treatment and Intervention

A

Despite various types of intervention and rehabilitation, still high rates of reoffending – varies by type of crime & some other factors.

Once person enters CJS, more likely to reoffend –criminogenic factors (Australian Institute of Criminology, 2007)

Move to reduce reoffending. Earlier intervention to divert people away from CJS, rehabilitate and limit exposure to criminogenic factors  reduce reoffending, keep people out of prison.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Community Corrections: Kennedy Report

A

Kennedy Report (1989)

  • Queensland Government-commissioned review of Corrective Services
  • ‘If punishment can be provided in a setting other than prison, and if the person can be adequately supervised outside prison, society should take this option’.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why community corrections: Economics

A
  • Cost of imprisonment vs. cost of community corrections, per person per year.
  • Average cost per prisoner per day in 2009-10 was $240.66, compared to $18.50 per day, per Community Corrections offender (Council of Australian Governments, 2012).
  • Savings cumulative and long-term.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Forms of community correction

A
Parole
Intensive correction order
Probation
Community Service Order
Fines
Home detention
20
Q

Problems with forms of community correction

A

Poor social/community image – seen as “soft” option particularly by people who value retribution more over rehabilitation/restoration
Overworked CCO’s, limited funding
Effectively overpopulating CC now
Lacks political support – continued funding cuts

21
Q

Drug Courts

A

Targets drug-dependent offenders whose history of crimes sees a result of their drug use – prison doesn’t address rehabilitation needs effectively, so keep reoffending.
Cannabis, amphetamines, poly-drug use most common.

The Queensland drug court program offers eligible offenders an opportunity to participate in an Intensive Drug Rehabilitation Order (IDRO)

22
Q

People who complete an intensive rehabilitation order

A

Large decline in their criminal activity

Lower rates of recidivism than non-completers or those who went to prison

23
Q

Youth and Community Corrections

A

Can also receive all the prior options – juvenile detention rather than jail, though.

Other options include:
Graffiti removal orders
Community service orders
Supervised release (assisted reintegration)

Youth justice conferencing - restorative

Youth boot camps

24
Q

Aboriginal Australians and Courts

A

Address law and justice in way that Aboriginal communities understand and respond to in accordance with their customs, laws and understanding of what is just and right

Also in response to deaths in custody concerns, very high rates of reoffending compared to other Australians.

25
Q

Murri Courts

A

Murri Courts – Magistrate court founded in 2006 in Queensland in response to extreme overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in both prison and juvenile detention.

26
Q

Evaluation of the Murri Courts

A

Evaluated by Australian Institute of Criminology after running for 4 years.

Improved attendance – less absconding (Adults 4% DNA at Murri Court compared to 12% at mainstream; youth 28% compared to 40%)

Stronger relationships between courts and Indigenous communities

No real improvement in recidivism or violations of court orders – slight but not statistically significant.

Murri Court program closed under Newman government in December 2012 – lack of evidence of effectiveness, to save money (save $36 million over 4 years).

Concern that in long-run will cost more money than what saved in short-term by axing program – was it closed too soon?

Reintroduced in Queensland this year.

27
Q

Summary

A

Various ways psychology intersects with prison
High mental illness rates
Difficulties with prison-based intervention
Move to community corrections where appropriate

28
Q

Types of Prediction Outcomes: True Positive

A

A correct prediction that occurs when a person who is predicted to engage in some type of behaviour (e.g. a violent act) does so

29
Q

Types of Prediction Outcomes: True Negative

A

A correct prediction that occurs when a person who is predicted not to engage in some type of behaviour (e.g. a violent act) does not

30
Q

Types of Prediction Outcomes: False positive

A

An incorrect prediction that occurs when a person is predicted to engage in some type of behaviour (e.g. a violent act) but does not

31
Q

Types of Prediction Outcomes: False Negative

A

An incorrect prediction that occurs when a person is predicted not to engage in some type of behaviour (e.g. a violent act) but does

32
Q

Base Rate Problems

A

Represents the percentage of people within a given population who commit a criminal or violent act

33
Q

Illusory Correlation

A

Belief that a correlation exists between two events that in reality are either not correlated or correlated to a much lesser degree

34
Q

Unstructured Clinical Judgement

A

Decisions characterised by a substantial amount of professional discretion and lack of guidelines

35
Q

Actuarial Prediction

A

Decisions are based on risk factors that are selected and combined based on their empirical or statistical association with a specific outcome

36
Q

Structured Professional Judgement

A

Decisions are guided by a predetermined list of risk factors that have been selected from the research and professional literature. Judgement of risk level is based on the evaluator’s professional judgement

37
Q

Risk Factor: Static Risk Factor

A

Risk factor that does not fluctuate over time and is not changed by treatment (e.g. age at first arrest). Also known as historical risk factor

38
Q

Risk Factor: Dynamic Risk Factor

A

Risk factors that fluctuate over time and are amenable to change

39
Q

Historical risk factors

A

Risk factors that refer to events that have been experienced in the past (e.g. age at first arrest) Also known as static

40
Q

Dispositional Risk Factors

A

Risk factors that reflect the individual’s traits, tendencies, or styles (e.g. negative attitudes)

41
Q

Clinical Risk Factors

A

Types and symptoms of mental disorders (e.g. substance abuse)

42
Q

Contextual/ Situational Risk Factors

A

Risk factors that refer to aspects of the current environment (e.g. access to victims or weapons)

43
Q

Desistance

A

The process of ceasing to engage in criminal behaviour

44
Q

Antisocial Personality Disorder

A

Characterised by a history of behaviour in which the rights of others are violated

45
Q

Sociopathy

A

A label used to describe a person whose psychopathic traits are assumed to be due to environmental factors

46
Q

Adversarial Allegiance

A

The tendency for forensic experts to be biased toward the side (defence or prosecution) that hired them