Definitions Flashcards

(56 cards)

1
Q

Falsification

A

Hypothesis testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Hypothesis

A

Statement of relationship between variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Null Hypothesis

A

No difference. Presumed that groups have the same results regardless of the treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Standardised

A

Can be repeated and verified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Validity

A

Must measure what it’s intended to measure. Credibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reliability

A

Must be repeatable with consistent results. Dependability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

BHC temporal relationship

A

Exposure always precedes the outcome, essential presence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

BHS strength

A

Stronger the association the more likely the relation of ‘A’ to ‘B’ is causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

BHS dose-response

A

Increasing exposure increases the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BHS consistency

A

Find same results consistantly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BHS Plausibility

A

Agrees with current understandings of pathological processes (has theoretical base)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BHS Consideration of alternative explanations

A

And effectively ruled them out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

BHS experiment

A

Condition can be altered and prevented by appropriate experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

BHS specificity

A

When single cause produces specific effect (weakest criteria)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

BHS coherence

A

Association should be compatible with existing theory and knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Paradigms

A

Patterns of belief and general assumptions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Attention arm

A

Similar to intervention but without the active ingredient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Population

A

Target group we are interested in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Simple random (probability sampling)

A

Random selection of everyone on population list - rare because hard to get population list.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Stratified random (probability sampling)

A

Put in groups according to characteristics (like gender) and then randomly selected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Cluster (probability sampling)

A

Useful when not everyone in population is known. Random selection of larger units (like hospitals) which participants are then randomly selected from

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Systematic (probability sampling)

A

Random selection at predetermined intervals (E.g. every 20th person)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Probability sampling

A

Unbiased sample, everyone who meets criteria has chance of selection. Can work out probability.

24
Q

Non-probability sampling

A

Non-random, chance of being selected cannot be estimated.

25
Single blind
One person knows which arm they're in. (might be obvious which treatment they're receiving). Person assessing the outcome doesn't know which.
26
Double blind
Neither the participant nor the person assessing the outcome knows the arm (E.g. placebo)
27
Internal validity:
Results legitimate because of the way the study was conducted, did independent really change dependent?
28
Another word for external validity
Generalizability
29
Hawthorne effect
Response to being in a study
30
Descriptive statistics
Ways of displaying and summarising data
31
Nominal measurement
Labelling variables, no quantitative. (M/F, hair colour, area you live).
32
Ordinal measurement
Order is important but differences between each is unknown
33
Interval measurement
Know the difference between values, intervals. 50-60 degrees
34
Ratio measurements
Same as interval but has clear 0 (height and weight)
35
Mean
Arithmetic average
36
Interquartile range
Difference between 20% and 75%
37
Standard deviation
Subtract mean from each number, mean of remaining values.
38
Variance
Standard deviation multiplied by self
39
P value
Probability of obtaining your study results if the null hypothesis is true
40
What can the P value be?
Between 0 and 1. (Closer to 0 =more likely null hypothesis should be rejected -> so there's a difference, you were right).
41
Statistical significance
- Is often set at 5%. - If P≤0.05 it’s closer to 0, evidence to reject null hypothesis. - If P≥0.05 there is insufficient evidence to reject null hypothesis
42
Power study
Probability of being able to detect difference between the study groups. Usually %. E.g. 80% power -> 80% chance of detecting difference.
43
Confidence interval
Precision of the quantity of interest that is estimated
44
Emic perspective
Insider's point of view
45
Constructivism
Construct social words. Individuals create meaning through interactions.
46
Ethnography
Study of culture. Origins in Anthropology
47
Phenomenology
Study of phenomena/ lived experience of individuals
48
Grounded theory
- Idea is to generate theory more than description. - Specific set of methods - Hypotheses generated - Developed by Glaser and Strauss
49
Homogenous sampling
Opposite of maximum variation sampling. Example: first placement experience of male students.
50
Theoretical sampling
Uses grounded theory. Used to find participants who will help the research build the theory.
51
Data satuation
guides the sample size. Sampling stops when enough data has been collected, size not pre-determined.
52
Concurrent data analysis
Reducing the data, analysing it during data collection and in grounded theory.
53
Constant comparative analysis
To develop hypotheses, test them out at subsequent interviews.
54
Thematic content analysis
Themes are given a code (word or phrase) Codes then collapsed into categories. After data already collected.
55
Framework analysis.
Put data into categories..
56
Objectivity
Confirmability.