Diminished Responsibility Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

What is the act and section number for DR

A

S.52 Coroners and Justices Act 2009, amended S.2 Homicide Act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the main term (umbrella term) for DR

A

Abnormality of mental functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What 3 points need to be proven for abnormality of mental functioning

A

1.Recognised medical condition
2.Substantially impaired D’s ability to-
-understand nature
-form rational judgement
-exercise self control
3.Provides an explanation for d’s acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

POL R v Byrne

A

Also covers the ability to exercise willpower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

POL R v Fairweather

A

The abnormality of mental functioning must be at the time of the murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

POL R v Martin

A

There was a recognised medical condition and made it voluntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

POL R v Brennan

A

If 2 doctors agree on the recognised condition- murder has to be withdrawn from the jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case for To form a rational judgement

A

R v Martin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case for To exercise self-control

A

R v Byrne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

POL R v Brown

A

Impairment must be substantial not partial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

POL R v Golds- Question

A

Does “substantial” mean more than trivial or minimal, or does it require something greater?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Answers R v Golds by R v Simcox

A

It means more than minimal or trivial, but does not require total impairment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

POL R v Osbourne

A

It has to provide an explanation for D’s acs and omissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

POL R v Dietschmann

A

Alcohol could still be part of a defence for DR but the abnormality has to be the substantial cause of the killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

POL R v Wood

A

Alcohol dependency is a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

POL R v Dowds

A

Acute voluntary intoxication is a medical condition but no defence for DR

17
Q

POL R v Joyce

A

No defence if their abnormality arose from purely voluntary intoxication