Dispute Resolution Flashcards

(48 cards)

1
Q

What is a Part 36 offer?

A

It is a formal, written settlement offer which is designed to encourage parties to make and accept reasonable offers, through a system of financial incentives and consequences.

It is designed to encourage parties to settle early, as there are specific cost consequences if it is not accepted by trial. The outcome of acceptance is more certain for parties, than relying on the court’s discretion for costs.

They can be made by either party, at any stage of proceedings.

Part 36 offers must be genuine attempts to settle and must be ‘without prejudice save as to costs’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the fundamental rationale behind a Part 36 offer (from offeror’s / offeree’s perspective)?

A

Offeror’s perspective:
- Make a valid Part 36 offer and potentially obtain extra benefits at trial if the offer is not accepted

Offeree’s perspective:
- Receive a valid Part 36 offer and potentially face sanctions at trial if the offer is not accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the standard and burden of proof for a civil claim (contract or negligence)

A

The claimant must prove their case (duty, breach, causation and loss) on the balance of probabilities

  • This means the claimant’s case is more probably true than not true
  • Every fact in the dispute must be proved. The burden generally falls on the party asserting it
  • The burden of proving any issues of fact or law generally fall on the party who asserts it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the purpose of evidence at trial

A

Evidence is how a party seeks to prove that its case is the right one
- Every fact in issue must be proved, and this is done by evidence
- Evidence must be relevant to a fact in issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Oral evidence at trial

A

The general rule is that any fact proved by evidence of a witness at trial must be proved by oral evidence. This means that the witness needs to attend to give oral evidence at trial

Witnesses are required to serve a witness statement in advance of the trial
- The witness statement stands as evidence in chief at trial to save time and costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Expert evidence

A

The court’s permission is needed to adduce expert evidence at trial
- The costs of instructing experts can be significant
- Court controls what evidence can be put before the court at trial
- Party can instruct as many experts as it likes, but needs a direction to rely on expert evidence at trial
- Expert evidence is restricted to that which is reasonably required to resolve proceedings

The expert produces a report and this is (usually) the evidence which is then put at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is disclosure?

A

The process whereby parties exchange documents relevant to the dispute
- Disclosure = state the document exists
- Inspection = party to whom it has been disclosed looks at the document

The general rule is that if a party discloses a document, they have a right to inspect it

The obligation for disclosure comes from a court order, given either on allocation or at a case management conference

  • Disclosure is a continuing obligation: any duty of disclosure continues until proceedings are concluded
  • There is no need to apply to court for disclosure if a new document comes to light, simply disclose it on the other party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Advice to clients about disclosure duties and preserving documents

A

At the outset of the matter:
- Advise clients to preserve all documents
- Not to create any unnecessary documents that might not be privileged

Solicitor must ensure a client’s compliance with duty of disclosure
- A party cannot rely on any document which they fail to disclose or which they fail to permit for inspection
- If a client fails to disclose a document which they need to or sign a disclosure statement knowing they are signing a false statement - must cease to act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a client required to do under standard disclosure order

A

The party must make a reasonable search for documents

What is reasonable depends on:
- Number of documents involved
- Nature and complexity of proceedings
- How difficult or expensive it is to retrieve a document
- Significance of the document

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is legal advice privilege

A

This protects confidential communications between a lawyer and their client where those communications are for the purpose of giving or seeking legal advice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is litigation privilege

A

Protects communications between lawyers or their clients and any third parties for the purpose of obtaining advice or information in connection with an existing or reasonably contemplated litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is without prejudice communication

A

A document whose purpose is a genuine attempt to settle a dispute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mediation

A

Mediation involves the appointment of an independent mediator who engages in “shuttle diplomacy” to bring the two parties together to reach a deal/resolution. This is done in person during a one-day session. The process is entirely voluntary and confidential.

  • Flexible
  • Privacy
  • Helps to reconcile relationships - hear the other party’s side
  • Limit stress and expense of court proceedings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is consideration (requirement for a valid contract)

A

The price one party pays to make another party’s promise enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is promissory estoppel?

A

It is an equitable doctrine which prevents a party from going back on a promise when another party has acted on it to their detriment
- It allows a promise to be enforced despite not being supported by consideration
- It aims to protect a party who relied on it to their detriment
- Often used in instances of part payment of debt

Four elements:
1. It can only be used as a defence, not a cause of action
2. There must be clear and unequivocal promise or representation that existing legal rights will not be fully enforced
3. There must be change of position in reliance on promise
4. It would be inequitable to allow promisor to go back on promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does it mean if an agreement is subject to contract?

A

It is NOT binding - neither party intends to be bound until the contract is made, each party reserves the right to withdraw until such time as the contract is made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does it mean to ‘lack capacity’

A

Unable to make a decision for oneself in relation to the matter, at the time the contract is entered into

Effect of entering into a contract for sale with someone with mental incapacity:
- It is binding
- Unless the person claiming incapacity can establish
a) they did not understand what they were doing
b) the other party knew this to be the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the effect of privity of contract?

A

A contract creates rights and obligations only between those party to it. This means that no person can sue or be sued on a contract unless they are a party to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the impact of Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999?

A

Allows a third party in certain circumstances to enforce a term of a contract to which they are not a party, even if they have not provided any consideration
- It does not allow a contract to be enforced against a third party

For it to apply:
1. Contract must specifically provide that X has the right to enforce/sue on the contract (expressly identified)
2. Contract purports to confer a benefit
3. Not the case that it appears the contracting parties did not intend the term to be enforceable by third party

Burden of proof:
Contract purports to confer benefit on third party = rebuttable presumption that third party can enforce the term

Remedies: any remedy available had the third party been party to the contract

  • The parties can exclude this via an ‘exclusion of third party rights’ clause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is an express term vs implied term of a contract?

A
  • An express term is a statement made by the parties by which they intend to be bound. These can be orally, in writing or both
  • An implied term is not one which has been agreed by the parties, but one which the law deems exists

The difference between a term and representation, is that a term is intended to be binding
- If a term is not fulfilled, this gives rise to breach of contract

21
Q

Incorporation of express terms by signed written contract

A

The general rule is that all terms of a signed contract are binding, even if a party has not read or understood the terms
- To be incorporated by signature, the document must be contractual and signed at or before time of contracting

Exception: if the document was not one which was intended to have a contractual effect, then the terms will not form part of the contract (e.g., signing a document acknowledging receipt of goods / post-contractual document does not indicate intention to be bound)

22
Q

What is an entire agreement clause?

A

An ‘entire agreement clause’ provides that a particular document constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. This means that parties to the written contract can reduce the possibility of a claim that there are binding oral terms alongside the written terms

23
Q

What is incorporation by a course of dealing?

A

If a clause has been brought to the notice of the other part during previous dealings, it may be implied into current transaction even though it has been omitted on this occasion
- Need to show consistent and regular course of dealing

24
Q

What are consequences of breach of a condition?

A

A condition is an important term going to the root of the contract

Breach gives rise to right of election:
- Affirm contract & claim damages OR
- Terminate & claim damages

Note - contract does not terminate automatically, there is a choice

25
What is a repudiatory breach?
A breach of condition which allows the innocent party to terminate the contract. The innocent party can choose either to end the contract or to affirm it (repudiation is not automatic)
26
What is the pre-trial checklist (listing questionnaire)?
Pre-trial checklist enables the court to determine if further directions are needed before trial. To check the case is ready for trial. Purpose is that it allows the court to: - Check case management directions previously given have been complied with and case is ready for trial - Give any further necessary directions - Fix a date for trial (or confirm date already fixed) - The parties give details of any experts or witnesses Deadline: - pre-trial checklist is sent to each party at least 14 days before the due date for filing - the due date for filing will be at least eight weeks prior to the trial date or start of trial period
27
What is a judgment?
The final decision a judge makes after hearing all the evidence. It is an order which ends the case and usually provides a provision for costs. A judgment order is effective from the date it is given or made - Parties have 14 days to comply with a judgment/order for a payment of money
28
What is an order to obtain information from a judgment debtor
Oral examination at court where an individual/officer gives information about the judgment debtor's financial means - It is an order only available after judgment - Orders the debtor/officer to attend court - Standard list of questions which can be added to and must produce documents - Questions are answered under oath - Served personally on the individual - not less than 14 days before the hearing - Consequences if fail to attend: imprisonment / fine - Held in contempt of court if they do not attend Purpose: obtain information to determine what methods of enforcement can be used (e.g., what assets to go after)
29
What is an appeal?
Sometimes court decisions are wrongly made and an appeal offers the opportunity for the decision to be corrected by a different judge. They can be brought in relation to decisions at trial and interim applications. There are limits on the right to appeal: - There is not an automatic right - This means permission of the court is required. Permission is only granted if the court considers there is a real prospect of success; or some other compelling reason - The grounds for appeal must be established: original decision was unjust or wrong An appeal takes the form of a review (not a re-hearing) - This means there is no new evidence and no live witnesses
30
What is settlement?
An agreement between the parties of the dispute to resolve the disagreement without going to court or continuing with proceedings
31
What is a consent order?
A consent order is an agreement between the parties to resolve matter and this disposes of proceedings (use a consent order if proceedings have commenced). - A consent order can also be used at an interim application Once a matter is settled, it is recorded in a consent order. - A consent order is evidence of the contract between the parties. It is a legally binding agreement and is confirmed by the court - A consent order requires the court's approval
32
What is a Tomlin Order
It is a type of consent order used to stay proceedings on the agreed terms. It contains: 1. A consent order which is the public settlement. - This must include any direction for payment of money out of court or payment of costs 2. A schedule which is confidential and contains terms and details of the agreement between the parties. It is used when: - Parties wish for key settlement terms to be confidential - Agreed settlement terms go beyond those a court could order (e.g., commercial terms) Putting it in place: - A consent order and a Tomlin Order need the court's approval
33
When is a settlement agreement used?
If no proceedings have been issued, the parties record their agreement in a settlement agreement which is a form of contract.
34
What is discontinuance?
The claimant chooses not to pursue the claim any further and this ends proceedings in relation to the claim - Only the claimant can discontinue the claim - Can discontinue whole / part Effect: 1. End of proceedings 2. Claimant likely ordered to pay Defendant's costs (on standard basis) up to the date of discontinuance Procedure: - File notice of discontinuance at court - Serve notice on the parties - Discontinuance takes effect from the date of service
35
What is a Calderbank offer vs a Part 36?
- Calderbank offer is an offer communicated in writing and written 'without prejudice save as to costs' such that it cannot be referred to the judge until costs are considered after trial. Does not need to comply with rules for a Part 36 - Part 36 offer: complies with rules in Part 36 (made pursuant to Part 36)
36
What is strict liability (tort principles)?
Strict liability means there is liability without fault. - The fault does not depend on actual negligence or an intent to harm and parties can be found liable without it being necessary to show fault on their part Examples: - Vicarious liability - Product liability under the Consumer Protection Act
37
What is an employer's duty of care?
It is personal and non-delegable. This means that the ultimate responsibility for the safety of the employees rests with the employers. The employer's duty is to take reasonable precautions to ensure an employee's safety while at work
38
Difference between a contract of service and a contract for services?
- Contract of service - contract under which services are provided in an employer/employee relationship (e.g., cafe hires a waiter) - Contract for services - contract under which services are provided by an independent contractor, not in an employer/employee relationship (e.g., cafe calls an electrician)
39
What is repudiatory breach (to discharge a contract by breach)?
An innocent party can treat the contract as having been terminated by the defaulting party for 'repudiatory breach' - where one party has breached a condition or innominate term treated as a condition - Breach of condition is a serious breach of contract which means the innocent party is entitled to terminate the contract and claim damages - The innocent party must choose (elect) to terminate the contract Effects of terminating the contract: - puts an end to all obligations of the parties which have not been performed - innocent party can claim damages from specific breach and loss of contract - discharged from future obligations
40
Discharge by frustration
Frustration is about events beyond the control of either party, which occur after the contract is formed but make performance radically different from that which was agreed Effect of frustration: - If a contract is frustrated, it is automatically brought to an end. This means the parties are discharged from future obligations Expenses / costs which can be recovered: - Advance payments - Expenses may be set off against the advance payment Expenses prior to 'frustrating act' (helps paying party): - Recover the money paid before time of discharge - Money payable is no longer payable
41
Damages - compensating the innocent party for breach of contract
Compensation aims to put the innocent party in the position post-breach which they would have been in had the contract been performed Consider: - Causation - Remoteness - Mitigation
42
Contract - assessment of damages - expectation interest
Aims to put the innocent party in the position they would have been in had the contract been properly performed - Expectation interest is the default method for the courts to calculate interest - but they do not award if it is too speculative - If too speculative, claimant is limited to reliance loss - Cannot be awarded both expectation interest and reliance interest (mutually exclusive)
43
Contract - assessment of damages - reliance interest
Allows the innocent party to recover expenses which have been incurred in preparing for the contract, which are rendered pointless due to the breach - Put the innocent party in the position as if the contract had never been made - Backwards looking approach (losses incurred prior to breach) - Only allows recovery of wasted expenditure - Relevant if the expectation damages are too speculative
44
What to consider when assessing damages?
1. Damages - which calculation method is appropriate? 2. Causation - damages can only be recovered if they are caused by the breach 3. Remoteness - damages cannot be recovered if they are too remote 4. Mitigation - can be reduced if a claimant failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate its loss
45
Liquidated damages clause vs unliquidated damages
Liquidated damages clause: - A clause which stipulates a certain sum which is to be payable on a particular breach of contract. The parties have pre-assessed the loss at the time of contracting - Courts can intervene if there is an excessive sum that it becomes a penalty clause. The courts will strike out a penalty clause Unliquidated damages: - Damages assessed in the normal way, where the exact amount is not pre-agreed in the contract
46
Penalty clause in a contract
1. Clause is secondary - if it is an obligation which is triggered by a breach of contract to compensate the innocent party 2. Detriment out of all proportion to any legitimate interest of the innocent party in performance of primary obligation If the court finds the clause is a penalty (e.g., secondary obligation and no legitimate business interest is served) - it will not uphold the clause - If it is not a penalty - it is enforceable Court's decision - Burden of proof is on the party alleging it is a penalty clause - The courts do not invoke this lightly - Hard to establish penalty if it was negotiated on level playing field by two commercial parties with professional advisors
47
Guarantee vs indemnity
- Guarantee is a promise by a party to ensure that another party carries out its obligations, or a promise to fulfil these obligations if the other party does not. A guarantee must be in writing and signed by person agreeing to it - Indemnity is a promise to reimburse someone in the event that they suffer a stated loss. An indemnity is not subject to any formalities Practical implications of the difference - Under a guarantee, if party A's obligation ceases, if C has provided a guarantee, their obligation under the guarantee also ends - Under an indemnity, if C provides an indemnity, this remains in place
48
Duty to mitigate
The injured party must take reasonable steps to minimise the effect of a breach - losses which are attributable to a failure to do so will not be recoverable - Court looks favourably upon the Claimant