duress by threats Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

what is duress

A

occurs where the D is forced to commit the criminal act by someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

D is forced to commit a crime because of…

A
  • threats of death / serious injury made to him
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

where is duress not available as a defence

A
  • murder ( howe)
  • attempted murder (gotts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v hasan 2005 court ruling

A

set out points to clarify the tests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1st test

A

there must be a threat to cause death or serious injury ( valderrama- vega)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

points needed to satisfy the first test

A
  • must be effective but not always immediate ( hudson&taylor)
    -threat must take effect as soon as crime is committed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

why in r v hammond did duress not work as a defence

A

evidence failed to show the threat was imminent or immediate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2nd test

A

the threat must be directed against the defendant or their immediate family or someone close to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

points needed to satisfy the second test

A

person being threatened must be
-the defendant or
-their immediate family or
-someone close to them or
-a person for whose safety they would reasonably regard themselves responsible for

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3rd test

A

whether the D acted reasonably in the light of the threats will be judged objectively ( r v graham - graham test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what 2 questions are set out in the graham test

A
  • d honestly and feasibly believed life was in immediate danger AND
    -would a sober and reasonable person have responded in the same way?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3.1 ( R v bowen) stated what?

A

the jury are allowed to take some of the defendants characteristics into account

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what characteristics can be taken into account

A
  • age
    -pregnancy
    -serious physical disability
    -recognised medical illness
    -gender

only apply ones relevant to the scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

4th test

A

the threats relate directly to the crime committed by the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

points needed to satisfy the 4th test

A

D can only use the defence if the threats are made in order to commit a specific crime ( r v cole)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

5th test

A

there was no evasive action the d could have taken. duress is not available as a defence if there is a safe avenue of escape

17
Q

points needed to satisfy the 5th test

A

must be no time to escape / raise alarm ( r v gill)
if raising alarm would not be effective duress is allowed ( r v hudson & taylor)

18
Q

6th test

A

d cannot use the defence if they have voluntarily laid themselves open to threats

19
Q

points needed to satisfy the 6th test

A

-where D brought duress on himself defence will fail ( r v sharp)
-joining gang= fail ( r v hassan)