EAPP Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

Are errors in reasoning that
invalidate or weaken an argument.

A

LOGICAL FALLACIES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

They often appear convincing but rely on flawed logic, misleading statements,
or emotional appeals rather than sound reasoning.

A

LOGICAL FALLACIES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Claiming one small step will lead to extreme
    consequences.
  • Also known as the domino fallacy.
A

SLIPPERY SLOPE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Occurs when two or more points are rolled into one and
the reader is expected to accept or reject both at the same
time, when one point may be satisfactory while the other
is not.

A

COMPLEX QUESTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Occurs when the argument quotes an expert who’s not
qualified in the particular subject matter

A

APPEAL TO AUTHORITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Arguing that something must be true or good because
many people believe.

Also known as argumentatum ad populum (appeal to the
people) “Everybody is doing it.”

A

BANDWAGON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A fallacy that involves attacking or praising the people
who make an argument, rather than discussing the
argument itself.

Also known as Argumentum Ad Hominem, literally,
“argument toward the man.”

A

AD HOMINEM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A fallacy in which a conclusion is not logically justified
by sufficient or unbiased evidence.

A

HASTY GENERALIZATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It occurs when the writer mistakenly assumes that, because the first event preceded the second event, It must mean the first event caused the later one.

A

POST HOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It is the distortion or exaggeration of another person’s argument or position, so it is easier to attack.

A

STRAW MAN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Occurs when arguments contradict one another

A

INCONSISTENCY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Occurs when a threat, instead of reasoning is used
to argue

A

APPEAL TO FORCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is a form of paper writing in which the writer expresses his ideas and opinions about what has been read or seen.

A

REACTION PAPER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  • A genre of academic writing
  • Briefly and critically summarizes and evaluates a work or concept.
  • Summary + Evaluation = ?
A

CRITIQUE PAPER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Is a systematic way of highlighting weakness and strengths and its applicability to practice

A

CRITIQUING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Critiques can be used to evaluate:

A
  1. CREATIVE WORKS
  2. RESEARCHES
  3. MEDIA
15
Q

To judge or to evaluate someone or something.

16
Q
  • The paper or essay
  • The product of criticizing
17
Q

The person doing the criticism.

18
Q

Types of critical approaches in writing.

A
  1. READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM
  2. FORMALIST CRITICISM
  3. PSYCHOLOGICAL/PSYCHOANALYTIC CRITICISM
  4. BIOGRAPHICAL CRITICSM
  5. SOCIOLOGICAL CRITICISM
  6. HISTORICAL CRITICISM
19
Q
  • It focuses on the act of reading and how it affects our perception of meaning in a text (how we feel at the beginning vs. the end).
  • It also deals more with the process of creating meaning and experiencing a text as we read
A

READER-RESPONSE CRITICISM

20
Q

This approach emphasizes the form of a literary work to determine its meaning, focusing on literary elements and how they work to create meaning.

A

FORMALIST CRITICISM

21
Q
  • This approach emphasizes the form of a literary work to determine its meaning, focusing on literary elements and how they work to create meaning.
  • It looks at literary characters as a reflection of the writer.
A

PSYCHOLOGICAL/PSYCHOANALYTIC CRITICISM

22
Q

This approach argues that we must take an author’s life and background into account when we study a text. This approach refers to how the author has direct influence over the writing.

A

BIOGRAPHICAL CRITICISM

23
It focuses on the values of a society and how those views are reflected in a text. It also emphasizes the economic, political, and cultural issues within literary texts
SOCIOLOGICAL CRITICISM
24
What are the two sub-approaches of sociological criticism?
1. FEMINIST CRITICISM 2. MARXIST CRITICISM
25
Argues that every literary work is a product of its time and its world.
HISTORICAL CRITICISM