EBM Day 4 Flashcards
(39 cards)
Variance
Average of squared differences from the mean
SD
square root variance
SE +meaning
SD/sqrtN
The SD of the distribution of mean value
Central Limit Therom
When normal diet
More samples you take, more closer you get true mean
CI calc + meaning
mean+/-Z(usually 1.96)*SE
this is where we think sample mean lies
Point estimate
estimate of some value derived from study (mean, regression coeff etc)
Z=+1.96
Z=-1.96
what %
both in 97.5% or 2.5% chance of not being in
total = 5%
When to compare CI to 0 (2)or 1 (3)
0=correlation or dif
1-hazard ratio, relative risk, odds ratio (these all kinda same thing too)
ESSENTIALLY WHAT THE NULL IS
Smaller CI
Higher precision and more n
Marginally sig
A little bias either way can make sig or not sig
2x2 false pos and negative chart
draw
Misclassifcation
False positives and false negatives
TN, FN, TP, FP chart and sensitivity
draw
+PV and -PV and meaning
Predictive value
TP/TP+FP
TN/FN+TN
Probability that a patient with positive test result truly has disease
Probably that a patient with negative result does not have disease
Sensitivity and meaning and when best
TP/TP+FN
No false negatives
Negative result=rule out
SNOUT
Sennstive, negative rules out disease
GOOD FOR cheap and initial procedures
Specificity and meaning and when best
tN/FP+TN
No false positives
Positives-rule in
SPIN
Specific, positive rules in
GOOD FOR EXPENSIVE and dangerous PROCEDURES
Draw cut off point table with TP, TN, FP, FN
draw
Prevalence
TP+FN/TOTAL
LR+ and meaning
Likelihood ratio
TP/TP+FN/
FP/FP+TN
how likely to have disease when test is positive
how many times more likely a (+) test result is to be found in people with disease compared to those without
LR- and meaning
FN/TP+FN/
TN/TN+FP
how likely to have disease when test is negative
how many times more likely a (-) test result is to be found in people with disease compared to those without? i think
TP=
FP=
FN=
TN=
SE
1-SP (false positive rate)
1-SE
SP
1-SP
SEN
false postive rate
True positive rate
ROC Curve
Senstivity (TP) on Y
1-Specifity (FP rate) on X
Upper left is where you wanna be
Relationship between predictive value and prevalence
Lower prevalence, lower predictive value