EBM Day 4 Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Variance

A

Average of squared differences from the mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SD

A

square root variance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SE +meaning

A

SD/sqrtN

The SD of the distribution of mean value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Central Limit Therom

A

When normal diet

More samples you take, more closer you get true mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CI calc + meaning

A

mean+/-Z(usually 1.96)*SE

this is where we think sample mean lies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Point estimate

A

estimate of some value derived from study (mean, regression coeff etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Z=+1.96
Z=-1.96
what %

A

both in 97.5% or 2.5% chance of not being in

total = 5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When to compare CI to 0 (2)or 1 (3)

A

0=correlation or dif
1-hazard ratio, relative risk, odds ratio (these all kinda same thing too)
ESSENTIALLY WHAT THE NULL IS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Smaller CI

A

Higher precision and more n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marginally sig

A

A little bias either way can make sig or not sig

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2x2 false pos and negative chart

A

draw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Misclassifcation

A

False positives and false negatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

TN, FN, TP, FP chart and sensitivity

A

draw

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

+PV and -PV and meaning

A

Predictive value

TP/TP+FP
TN/FN+TN

Probability that a patient with positive test result truly has disease

Probably that a patient with negative result does not have disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Sensitivity and meaning and when best

A

TP/TP+FN

No false negatives
Negative result=rule out
SNOUT
Sennstive, negative rules out disease

GOOD FOR cheap and initial procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Specificity and meaning and when best

A

tN/FP+TN

No false positives
Positives-rule in
SPIN
Specific, positive rules in

GOOD FOR EXPENSIVE and dangerous PROCEDURES

17
Q

Draw cut off point table with TP, TN, FP, FN

18
Q

Prevalence

19
Q

LR+ and meaning

A

Likelihood ratio

TP/TP+FN/
FP/FP+TN

how likely to have disease when test is positive

how many times more likely a (+) test result is to be found in people with disease compared to those without

20
Q

LR- and meaning

A

FN/TP+FN/
TN/TN+FP

how likely to have disease when test is negative

how many times more likely a (-) test result is to be found in people with disease compared to those without? i think

21
Q

TP=
FP=
FN=
TN=

A

SE
1-SP (false positive rate)
1-SE
SP

22
Q

1-SP

SEN

A

false postive rate

True positive rate

23
Q

ROC Curve

A

Senstivity (TP) on Y
1-Specifity (FP rate) on X

Upper left is where you wanna be

24
Q

Relationship between predictive value and prevalence

A

Lower prevalence, lower predictive value

25
Post test probability
Probability of a disease after test result is known
26
Natural Frequencies Approach
Choose large population Use sensitivity to find TP Use 1-spec to find FP TP/TP+FP=+PV
27
Increase pretest probability
consider demograpics, presentation, clinical setting
28
Nomogram
use Pretest prob (prevalance) and then find LR and draw line to Post test prob (PV)
29
``` LR to change in disease prob % 10 5 2 .5 .1 ```
``` 45% 30% 15% -30% -45% ```
30
Parallel testing and sens/spec relationship
Test A or B, or C positive makes all positive Sens up, spec down
31
Serial testing and sens/spec relationship
Test A AND B AND C postiv Send down, Spec up
32
Independent tests | as related to serial/parallel testing
Assumed by parallel and serial testing
33
Index Test vs reference
new test when compared to gold standard
34
Basic approach to evaluating diagnostic tests
``` select patients test all patients with index diagnose in series then do gold standard Compare results of index test to reference index results Look for sources of error ```
35
5 challenges to establishing accuracy in diagnostic test
``` inappropraite ref standard spectrum bias verification bias observor bias chance ```
36
Spectrum bias and big problem
including only highly selected patients (such as those who would benefit) - problem of including people who would benefit a lot, and very little and leaving out middle (where there would be a lot of false positives and false negatives - big change to specificity and sensitivity
37
verification bias
work up bias | not giving both tests reference may be too invasive to give if respond to index
38
Observor bias (5 reasons why occur)
Ref standard is subjective Index and reference standard not evaluated independently Evaluators not blinded to results of other test Evaluators not blidned to patient characteristics
39
Must design index test without out this value
Reference standard-leads to bias if don't do this