ECHR Problem Question Flashcards

(10 cards)

1
Q

What is the core legal issue in Michael’s case?

A

Whether the High Court can rely solely on Article 8 ECHR to compel Michael to disclose Paul’s whereabouts and grant Anne access, without reference to Irish constitutional law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Article 29.6 of the Irish Constitution state about international agreements?

A

No international agreement is part of Irish domestic law unless determined by the Oireachtas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was the ECHR incorporated into Irish law?

A

Through the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003, at a sub-constitutional level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Section 2 of the ECHR Act 2003?

A

It obliges courts to interpret Irish law in a manner compatible with the ECHR ‘insofar as possible.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can the ECHR be given direct effect in Irish law?

A

No. Irish courts cannot apply ECHR rights autonomously without linking them to domestic law or constitutional provisions (McD v L [2009]).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why was the High Court’s reliance on Article 8 ECHR problematic in Michael’s case?

A

Because it gave Article 8 direct effect without grounding it in Irish statutory or constitutional law, contrary to McD v L and O’Donnell v South Dublin CC.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the significance of McCauley v Judge Fergus [2018]?

A

It reinforces that judicial review cannot rely on ECHR rights alone unless grounded in Irish law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can Article 8 of the ECHR override the Irish Constitution?

A

No. The Constitution remains supreme; ECHR rights operate only ‘insofar as permitted by the Constitution.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a declaration of incompatibility under the 2003 Act?

A

A formal finding that a statute conflicts with the ECHR, without invalidating the statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What would be a valid ground for Michael to appeal the High Court’s decision?

A

That the court erred in giving direct effect to Article 8 ECHR without considering domestic law or the Constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly