Education sociologists + studies Flashcards
(40 cards)
Academisation 2000
Marxism - bourgeoisie can run schools
Functionalism - increased competition and choice
Feminism - schools may not offer full range of subjects
Ball et al - parental choice
Encouragement of competition between schools had effects on them such as
- the publication of league tables incentivised to attract and maintain high achieving students by setting and streaming and publishing brochures etc. Skilled choosers make use of these resources to inform where their children go.
Ball - Banding
Beachside comprehensive - children with non-manual fathers had greatest chance of being top band. Behaviour of lower band students deteriorated over time and teachers had lower expectations - focusing k vocational and lower level exams.
Bernstein - speech codes
Attainment in school is related to speech patterns: the elaborated code is characteristic for the middle class and the restricted code for the working class.
Bourdieu - cultural capital
Education is biased towards the culture of the dominant social classes and devalues the knowledge of the working class. Middle-class students have an advantage as they are socialised into dominant culture and therefore possess more cultural capital.
Bowels and Gintis - capitalist conformity
Correspondence principle - the hidden curriculum and myth of meritocracy legitimises inequality and helps to produce a subservient workforce through acceptance of hierarchy, fragmentation and external rewards. Evidence - National curriculum.
Coard - African Carribean underachievement
Black groups are made to feel inferior in education because of disproportionate placement in SEN schools, teacher racism and ethnocentric curriculum which leads to low self-esteem and expectations.
Colley - gender inequalities in subject choice
Traditional masculinity and femininity still widespread
- Instrumental subject images like computing involves less peoples and formal teaching = masculine image
- Girls more comfortable with scientific and technical subjects in single sex schools
Criticism of Bernstein
Gaine and George - the distinction between classes is oversimplified as a clear working-class doesn’t exist anymore
Criticism of Bowels and Gintis
Reynolds - the curriculum doesn’t teach skills needed by employers or encourage uncritical passive behaviour
Willis - many pupils do not accept the hidden curriculum (Laddish Subcultures)
Criticism of Bowels and Gintis
Reynolds - the curriculum doesn’t teach skills needed by employers or encourage uncritical passive behaviour
Willis - many pupils do not accept the hidden curriculum (Laddish Subcultures)
Criticism of Davis and Moore
Weak link between qualifications and income (intelligence/ability has limited influence on achievement) because of social stratification
Criticism of Parsons
Fails to consider the diversity of values in modern society and assumes meritocracy works.
Criticism of Willis
Blackledge and Hunt - ignores the full range of subcultures in school that range from total conformity to total rejection.
Davis and Moore - education and role allocation
Education is a means of role allocation - the most talented individuals receive good qualifications and highly rewarding jobs
Douglas - parental interest
Middle-class parents discussed children progress more, expressed their desire for children to stay in school and gave greater stimulus and attention in primary socialisation years.
Durkheim - education and solidarity
Education provides the link between the individual and society, teaching specific skills needed for employment and social solidarity
Education act 1944
Marxism - benefitted m/c
Functionalism - meritocratic
Feminism - boys given advantage
Education reform act 1988
Marxism - prepares work force
Functionalism - greater equality
Lib feminism- good measure to tackle inequality
Evaluation of interactionism
Ireson et al - no evidence setting between year 7 and 11 has affect in attainment
Woods - has practical application, more detailed empirical evidence than Marxism
Francis - girls and achievement
- Subject gender divisions getting worse as fewer women pursue IT and Science degrees
- Males dominate classrooms despite girls overachieving in stats
- Boys received more discipline but more attention as a result
Francis and Skelton - Beck’s work
Increasing uncertainty about future = risk society and individualism. Girls are risk averse and seek security from qualifications and regard their careers as expressions or identity.
Francis and Skelton - moral panic about boys
Boys education has improved, girls just improved faster. Both face problems in education, reasons for male underachievement include:
- Boys reject labels of “swots”
- Girls fit ideal pupil model
- Increases awareness of boys that they are not innately better than girls
Fuller - rejection of labels
Black girls at a comprehensive resented negative teacher labelling and devoted themselves to academic success.
Criticism of deterministic labelling theory.