Education Theorists Flashcards
(96 cards)
According to Durkheim (1961) what is the major function of education?
The major function of education is the transmission of society’s norms and values. He maintained “society can survive only if there exists among its members a sufficient degree of homogeneity, education perpetuates and reinforces this homogeneity by fixing in the child from the beginning essential similarities with collective life demands”. The teaching of history in particular, provides this link between the individual and society, they come to see that they are part of something larger than themselves and develop a sense of commitment to the social group.
What does Durkheim (1961) argue the school is a model of?
It is society in miniature, a model of the social system. In school the child must interact with other members of school community in terms of a fixed set of rules. This experience prepares them for interacting with members of society as a whole in terms of society’s rules.
What does Durkheim (1961) state on the teaching of specialist skills?
Education teaches children with specialist skills necessary for their future occupations. This function is particularly important in industrial society with an increasingly complex and specialised division of labour. Schools transmit both general values, which provide the ‘necessary homogeneity for social survival’ and specific skills, which provide ‘necessary diversity for social cooperation’. Value consensus and a specialised division of labour whereby specialists combine to produce goods and services thus unite industrial society.
What does David Hargreaves (1982) argue on the transmission of values?
Education in modern Britain often fails to transmit shared values, promote self-disciple, or cement social solidarity. Hargreaves believes that in reality British education emphasises individuals competition through the exam system, rather than encouraging social solidarity.
What does Parsons (1961) argue on the ‘focal socialising agency’?
Schools act as a bridge between the family and society as a whole, preparing children for their adult role. It establishes universalistic standards, the same standards are applied to all students regardless of ascribed characteristics such as sex, gender, race, class or family, thus school is based on meritocratic principles. Modern industrial society is increasingly based on achievement, rather than ascription, on universalistic rather than particularistic standards and meritocratic principles, preparing the young for their adult roles.
Why does Parsons (1961) argue a value consensus is essential.
By encouraging students to strive for high levels of academic attainment, and by rewarding those who succeed, schools foster the value of achievement itself. By placing individuals in the same situation in the classroom and so allowing them to compete on equal terms in examinations, schools foster the value of equal opportunity.
What does Davis and Moore (1967) argue on role allocation?
They saw education as a means of role allocation, but they linked the educational system more directly with the system of social stratification. Davis and Moore see social stratification as a mechanism for ensuring that the most talented and able members of society are allocated to those positions that are functionally most important for society. Thus the education system sifts, sorts and grades individuals in terms of their talents and abilities.
What does Donald (1992) argue on multicultural societies?
The traditional functions of education are becoming increasingly inappropriate and impractical as globalisation progresses. The transmission of a common national culture is no longer possible in the multicultural societies of a globalised world. The cultures of today are too fragmented and diverse to weld into a national identity based on shared norms and values.
What do Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue the ‘correspondence principle’ is?
The major role of education in capitalist societies is the reproduction of labour power. In particular, they maintain that there is a ‘close correspondence’ between the social relationships which govern personal interaction in the work place and of the education system. Work casts a ‘long shadow’ over the education system, education is subservient to the needs of those who control the workforce.
What do Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue the ‘hidden curriculum’ is?
Education functions to provide capitalists with a workforce which has the personality, attitudes and values that are most useful to them, if capitalism is to succeed, it requires a hard working, docile, obedient and highly motivated workforce which is too fragmented and divided to challenge authority. The education system helps to achieve these objectives through the hidden curriculum.
What do Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue the American education system was creating?
The American education system was creating and unimaginative and unquestioning workforce that could be easily manipulated by employers.
What do Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue on the ‘jug and mug’ principle?
As students have little control over, and little feeling of involvement in their schoolwork, they get little satisfaction from studying. Learning is based upon the ‘jug and mug’ principle. The teachers possess knowledge that they pour into ‘empty mugs’, the students.
What do Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue on the principle of ‘divide and conquer’?
A fragmented and divided workforce is easier to control, and this control can be maintained because of the principle of ‘divide and conquer’. It becomes difficult for the workforce to unite in opposition to those in authority over them. This is practiced through knowledge being fragmented and compartmentalised into academic subjects, within the education system.
What do Bowles and Gintis (1976) argue on ‘the myth of meritocracy’?
Although education is free and open to all, Bowles and Gintis claim that some have much greater opportunities than others. The education system disguises this, with its myth of meritocracy, those who are denied success blame themselves and not the system that condemned them to failure. Education therefore, reproduces inequality by justifying and attributing poverty to personal failure. It merely disguises the fact that economic success runs in the family, that privilege breeds privilege.
What does Giroux (1984) argue on cultural identities within schools?
Students draw upon their own cultures in finding ways to respond to schooling, and often these responses involve resistance to the school. Schools can be seen as ‘sites’ of ideological struggle in which there can be clashes between cultures. Different classes, ethnic and religious groups all try to influence both the content and process of schooling.
What does Paul Willis (1977) reject?
He rejects the view that there us any simple, direct relationship between the economy and the way the education system operates. Willis focuses on the way that education prepares the workforce , but he denies that education is a particularly successful agency of socialisation.
What does Paul Willis (1977) argue on ‘lads’ within ‘counter-school cultures’?
Counter-school cultures are opposed to the values espoused by the school. The counter school culture had the following features. The ‘lads’ felt superior both to teachers and to conformist students, attaching little to no value to the academic work and had no interest in gaining qualifications. They resented the school, trying to take control over their time, constantly trying to win ‘symbolic and physical space from the institution and its rules’.
According to Willis (1977) how did the ‘lads’ within ‘counter-school cultures’ engage in the adult world?
Smoking cigarettes, consuming alcohol and avoiding wearing school uniform were all ways in which they tried to identify with the adult world. Many of them also had part-time jobs, which were more than just ways of earning cash, they were means of gaining a sense of involvement in the male, adult world.
According to Willis (1977), how had the education system failed to manipulate the ‘lads’?
The education system failed to manipulate the personalities of students to produce ideal workers. They neither deferred to authority nor were they obedient and docile. Furthermore they did not believe it was worth striving to maximise individual achievement. Yet, it was their very rejection of school which made them suitable for male unskilled manual work.
According to Willis (1977), how do the ‘lads’ engage in a capitalist system?
The lads hope to gain a little freedom, but they do not challenge the institution head-on. They know that they must do a certain amount of work in the factory or risk dismissal, and they realise that the state can enforce school attendance if it is determined to do so. The lads are bit directly or intentionally persuaded to act as they do by the school, nor are they forced to seek manual labour. Rather, they actively create their own subculture and voluntarily choose to look for manual jobs.
Why is Paul Willis’ (1977) research questionable within a contemporary society?
It is questionable how far Willis’ findings would apply in contemporary Britain, where they are far fewer unskilled manual jobs available and less chance of finding employment without educational qualifications.
What do Postmodernists, Usher and Edwards (1994) argue on educational curriculums?
Postmodernism denies that there is any single best curriculum that should be followed in schools. If there is no one set of truths that can be accepted, then there is no basis for saying that one thing should be taught in schools whereas other things should be excluded. Instead, education should teach many different things. Postmodernism is characterised by the decentring of knowledge, moving away from seeing any particular knowledge as central to all knowledge and superior to other forms of knowledge, reflected in the vast range of courses.
What does Basil Bernstein (1971) argue on social inequality?
‘Education cannot compensate for society’, in other words, education cannot make up for inequalities in wider society.
What is the overall neoliberal approach to education?
Marketisation is the key to raising standards in education. Schools, colleges and universities must compete for customers in a free and open market. This will give educational institutions an incentive to raise their standards in order to attract students. Therefore, school performance will be measured through ‘league tables’.