Elections And Refendums Flashcards
(80 cards)
What are the functions of UK elections?
-selecting representatives
-selecting political leaders
-selecting a government
-participation
-influencing policy by promoting the development of manifestos
-holding government and representatives accountable
-voter education
-legitimising the government by providing a mandate
What are the types of UK elections?
-general election
-devolved assembly elections
-local elections
-PCC elections
-by elections
What is a majoritarian electoral system?
-electoral systems in which the candidates with the highest number of votes in each constituency is elected
-FPTP is classed as majoritarian system (winning candidate only requires plurality rather than a majoirty)
What is a proportional electoral system?
-used to describe a range of system that produces a close fit between the proportion of votes and seats won
-proportional systems use multi-member constituencies and electoral formulas to allocate the seats within them to parties (STV)
How does the FPTP system work?
-650 constituencies = each roughly with 700,000 people (constituency boundaries decided by independent boundary commission)
-seeing winner is simple (candidates with the most votes win, no need for majority)
-winning party is the party with the most seats (to form a gov they must win a majority of seats)
2019: conservatives won 57% of the vote share and 368 seats (hung parliaments happen rarely only in 2010 and 17)
What are the strengths of FPTP?
-simple to understand
-direct link between voters and individual MP
-simple plurality system provides winners a strong bonus (provides strong stable majoritarian gov)
-extremism parties are kept out of parliament
What are the weaknesses of FPTP?
-simple plurality systems means that MPs lack a majority and have a questionable mandate
-produces disproportionate outcomes (2015 UKIp won 3.8 million votes but only got 1 seat)
-millions of votes wasted (70.8% of votes in the 2019 election were case for loosing candidates + winning candidates who already achieved plurality)
-safe seats means votes are wasted
-many voters feel forced to resort to tactical voting
-did not produce strong stable govs in 2010 and 2017
Argument that the FPTP system does meet the Jenkins commission criteria:
-establishes a direct link between MP and their constituency
-produces a stable gov
Argument that the FPTP system does not meet the Jenkins Commission:
-doesn’t give voters a wide choice, tactical voting
-doesn’t deliver a broadly proportional result
Where is STV used?
-used for the Northern Ireland assembly
-local elections in Scotland
How does STV work?
-large multi member constituencies and electoral
-voters number the candidates in order of preferences
-parties have multiple candidates in order to gain seats
-voters can pick candidates from different parties
-candidates have to reach a quota of votes
-first preferences are counted and those who achieve or exceed the quota are elected
-surplus votes from the winning candidates redistributed
-if seats still available those at the bottom are eliminated (their votes are redistributed until the seats are filled)
What are the strengths of STV?
-produces a broadly proportional result
-voters have a much greater choice (they can select multiple parties and priorities candidates)
-fewer wasted votes, surplus votes get redistributed
-smaller parties have a much greater chance of winning
-emirates the problem of safe seats + the need for tactical voting
What are the weaknesses of STV?
-takes a long time for votes to be counted and winner announced
-voting is confusing
-alphabet voting (those higher on the paper are more likely to be picked)
-existing constituency boundaries would need to be redrawn and enlarged (create large multi-member constituencies)
-proportional results means coalitions are more likely
Argument that STV does meet the Jenkins commission criteria:
-gives a proportional result
-gives voters a greater choice
Argument that STV does not meet the Jenkins Commission criteria:
-doesn’t produced a stable government
-doesn’t maintain the link between a single MP and a constituency
Where is the AMS system used?
-Scottish parliament
-Welsh assembly
-Grater London assembly
How does AMS work?
-under AMS voters cast 2 votes (one constituency vote for a local candidates + one regional vote for a party to be allocated proportionally)
-some representatives are elected using FPTP in single-member constituencies and electoral
-‘Additional members’ are elected in multi-member constituencies using the proportional regional list system
-d’Hondt formula is used to allocate seats
-greater number of regional lists, the more proportional the final result
-Scottish parliament elections (73 seats are determined using FPTP in single member constituencies)
-56 seats are allocated using the regional party list system
What are the strengths of AMS?
-combines the best features of FPTP and proportional systems (produces a proportional result (maintains a constituency link)
-fewer wasted votes, the regional vote counts
-voters have a greater choice + can selection a minority party for the regional vote without fearing it will be wasted
-regional party list can be used to improve representation of minorities (alternating male and female candidates on party lists)
What are the weaknesses of AMS?
-system creates 2 class of MP (acceptable to the electorate and others to party leaders)+ led to tensions in MSPs
-party leaders became extremely influential because they determine the composition and order of the party lists
-small parties still under represented
-more complicated than FPTP (increases the risk of incorrectly completed ballot papers)
Argument that the AMS system does meet the Jenkins Commission criteria?
-gives broadly proportional results
-gives voters a greater choice
-maintains a link between a single MP and a constituency
Argument that AMS does not meet the Jenkins Commission criteria?
-does not produce a stable gov
What constitutional reform did Labour promise in their 1997 manifesto?
-AMS was introduced for the Scottish Parliament + Welsh Assembly
-STV was introduced for the Northern Ireland Assembly
-SV was introduced for Mayor of London and PCC’s
-pledge to identify a proportional alternative for FPTP for general elections
What are the advantages of electoral reform?
-greater third party successes (proportional systems have meant that support for third parties has transferred to seats)
-UKIP won the 2014 European parliaments elections + SNP has won successive Scottish parliament elections
-Greater choice (AMS gives voter a greater choice, STV allowed voters to rank candidates from multiple parties + split tickets)
-fewer wasted votes (redistribution of votes in STV and AMS is proportional)