The Prime Minsiter And The Cabinet Flashcards
POLITCSSSSS (62 cards)
CASE STUDY:
Andrew Mitchell and ‘pleb gate’
2012:
-Andrew Mitchell chief whip called a police officer a pleb
-Mitchell was forced to resign
-this was because he had become a distraction for the gov and PM
What are the 7 principles of the ministerial code?
- Selflessness: ministers should act in the public interest
2.Integrity: must not take sections in order to gain financial benefits + meant to prohibit corruption
3.objectivity: must act and take decision impartially, fairly and based on merit
4.accountability: ministers must be accountable to the public and parliament for their decisions and must submit themselves to scrutiny
5.openness: must make decisions in an open and transparent manner
6.honesty:ministers should be truthful to both parliament and the public
7.leadership
How is the PM chosen?
-not chosen directly by the people, but rather is the leader of the largest party in the commons
-when an election is not clear cut and no clear majoirty (e.g 2017 May was appointed PM and formed a confidence and supply arrangement with the DUP)
How do the PM’s leave office?
-by loosing and election and are forced out by voters
-retire (e.g Harold Wilson in 1976)
-pressure from the parliamentary party
What is meant by the core executive?
-policy making network that includes the PM, junior ministers, cabinet committees and top civil servants
What are cabinet committees?
-specialist subdivisions of the cabinet
-compromise of fewer members who focus on particular policy areas
What are the key roles of the core executive?
-making policy: role of the executive and cabinet to decide on policy and the administrative part of implementing policy down to the civil service
-passing legislation: though it’s parliament that must pass all laws, most major laws are decided in cabinet
-financing: key role of the chancellor and treasury + make decisions on taxation and gov spending typically announced in the annual budget
-being the national first responder: during national emergencies (war,terrorist outrages, pandemic) the executive is required to put together emergency measure and to reassure the public
What are the main powers of the executive?
-appointment/dismissal of ministers by the PM + other patronage powers
-deployment of UK armed forces overseas
-relations with international power and international diplomacy
-making and ratifying treaties
-organisation and structure of the civil service
-issuing directives and statements during the times of national emergency
The prerogative powers of the executive are significant:
-opportunity to deploy armed forces overseas + PM does not need to seek parliamentary approval to go to war or have to seek approval for additional funding
-PM has unlimited choice on who joins and leaves the gov + presence of Lords means that the PM can choose someone who doesn’t have democratic mandate (e.g Lord David Cameron in 2023 as Secretary of State)
-during national crises the PM can deliver a broadcast and messages to reassure the public + around 27 million were estimated to have watched Johnson’s message on covid lockdown
-executive has crucial role in negotiating treaties and agreements with other nations on trade and defence
The prerogative powers of the executive are not significant:
-by convention all recent military action has been put before a vote in the commons (e.g Gulf War + air strikes in Syria and Iraq)
-PM is constrained in their choice of ministers + choice a diverse cabinet and have a broad spectrum of party (e.g May had remainders and brexiteers in her cabinet)
-PM relies on parliament to pass legislation (e.g Anti-terror laws)
-Brexit showed that the prerogative powers of the PM can be limited + SC ruling forced the PM to submit any Brexit deal before parliament
Why can it be argued that the role of the PM has become more presidential?
-the cabinet is no longer a forum for open debate +critics say that the traditional model of cabinet ceases to exist
-Thatcher and Blair have been accused of Presidentialism + Blair’s formed Northern Ireland secretary Mo Mowlam stated that ‘cabinet itself was dead’
-Blair was accused on preferring a ‘sofa government’ + ‘kitchen cabinet’
-2010 coalition ‘the quad’ were accused of dominating cabinet
Who were ‘the quad’ in the 2010-15 coalition?
-PM David Cameron, Deputy PM Nick Clegg, Chancellor George Osborne and Chief secretary of the treasury Danny Alexander
-PM relied heavily on his inner cabinet/kitchen cabinet
How has the role of SpAds changed?
-first appointed by Harold Wilson in the 1960s
-they are personal and political appointments made by the PM
-they are believed to yield too much power
Examples of influential SpAds:
-Blair’s Chief of Staff Alistair Campbell (intervened during one of Blair’s interviews saying ‘we don’t do God’)
-May: Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill
-Johnson: Dominic Cummings
Why have SpAds been criticised?
-Clare Short in her 2003 resignation speech stated: that the problems of Labours second term in office were down to the centralisation of power in the hands of the PM and a select number of advisors
-Cummings was repeatedly seen to have been too powerful by both the Conservative Party and the public
What is the argument against presidentialism?
-Thatcher, Blair and Johnson so suggest power premieres, however this is somewhat misleading
-PMs with weak or non-existent parliamentary majorities can’t dominate + May suffered two defeats in commons over her Brexit deal and her cabinet was deeply divided over her ‘Chequers deal’ + David Davies and Johnson resigned after the deal
-Blair and Thatcher were forced out of their position because of criticism and divides within their own party (Blair and the Iraq War + Thatcher over the Poll Tax)
Argument that the role of the PM has greatly changed in recent times:
-several PMs, like Blair and Thatcher have been accused of running a more presidential style of leadership + bypassed full cabinet meetings and preferring gatherings of key ministers and SpAds
-growth in the use of SpAds at the expense of seeking policy advice from civil servants
-development of social media and celebrity culture led to a growing focus on personality of individual rather than the wider cabinet + seen in the start of election debates being televised in 2010
-increased media scrutiny led the PM to focus on popular media and delivering messages directly to the people
The role of the PM has barely changed in recent times:
-no formal changes in the powers available to the PM + same prerogative powers
-premierships of Blair and Thatcher should be assessed alongside that of Major, May and Cameron
-influence of SpAds somewhat exaggerated + during covid the most powerful advice came from medical experts (Chief medical office Professor Chris Whitty)
-PMs want to portray themselves as collegiate and collaborative in their approach to leadership
Why can the modern day PM be described as a parliamentary president?
-formal institutional powers of the PM has changed very little
-only hey context and particular situations of the premierships has changed
What are the sources of policies?
-manifesto pledges and promises
-personal convictions of the PM, usually reflected in the manifesto
-outcomes of referendums
-results of deals with minority to coalition parties
-responses to national crises and emergency situations
-pressure from the public and media
-changing social and cultural attitudes
CASE STUDY:
Fulfilling a manifesto pledge—> extending free childcare
-2017: Conservative manifesto promised to offer working parents of 3 and 4 year olds 30 hours of free childcare a week
-Scheme was rolled out in September 2017, when the Conservative won the election
CASE:
personal conviction of the PM—>privatisation and the sale of council houses
-Thatcher was often referred to as a ‘conviction politician’
-belief was in the benefits of a property owning democracy
-1979-1990 council tenants were given the right to buy, enabled them to buy their own homes at substantially reduced rates
-1981: 5.4 million were in social housing
-1991: 500,000 were in social housing
-also nationalised industries such as British Telecom, gas and electricity companies and social mines
CASE STUDY:
Outcome of a referendum —>Brexit
-2016: Brexit Ref saw a 52:48 victory for those who had voted leave
-Cameron resigned and May was left to implement Brexit
-referendum result was one that the PM and many MPs disagreed with
-Cameron voted remain but was left to implement the result (ultimately resigned though)
-May ultimately failed to pass a Brexit deal through the commons, replaced by Johnson who managed to pass Brexit deal through
CASE STUDY:
The results of deals with minority/other coalition parties —> 2011 AV referendum
-2010 hung parliament led to a coalition between the Conservative and LibDems
-aimed to provide stability in the aftermath of financial crash + represented compromise between the manifesto promises of each party
-one of the terms was to hold a referendum on the voting system for Westminster elections
-national referendum on adopting the AV system was defeated by 67.9% and only 41% turned up to vote