Elements of a Crime Flashcards

1
Q

crime

A

actus reus + mens rea+ causation = crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

actus reus

A

physical part of the crime; act that caused the harm

volitional act: must be a willed muscular action

generally no duty to act
(exceptions for 1. special relationships, 2. duty imposed by contract 3. statutorily created duties 4. whena person creates a risk of harm to another)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

result crime

A

tangible harm like murder (most crimes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

conduct crime

A

social harm doesnt always have tangible result

DUI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

attendant circumstance

A

fact or condition that exists at the time of conduct or result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

mens rea

A

guilty mind: intent/mental state of actor when committing the social harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Purposely (mr)

A

actors CONCIOUS OBJECT to cause the result or perform the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

knowingly

A

actor is aware that the result is VIRTUALLY CERTAIN to occur for result crime and aware of conduct for conduct crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

intentional acts

A

purposely and knowingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

recklessly

A

actor conciously takes a SUBSTANTIAL AND UNJUSTIFIABLE RISK in causing a particular result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

negligently

A

actor inadvertently creates a substantial and unjustifable risk for which he OUGHT TO BE AWARE

  • gross deviation from standard of care
  • higher degree of negligence than in civil context
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

knowingly and willful blindness doctrine

A

willful blindness is a mechanism to impute knwoledge to defendant who is deliberately shielding himself from knowledge of an attendant circumstance

  • D must subjectively believe there is a high probability that the fact exists and
  • must take deliberate actions to avoid learning of the fact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

strict liability offenses

A

only actus reus needs to be satisfied–> public welfare offenses: environmental violations , food and drug fvilations, traffic offenses and statutory rape

malum prohibitum- conduct that is not necessarily morally wrong but could impact health and safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

specific intent crimes

A

require special mental element in addition to mental state required for the crime
-knowingly in possession of drug WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

General intent crimes

A

only have one mental state and it relates solely to the social harm of the crime
batttery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

actual causation

A

factual causation
but for test- but for the defendants voluntary act or omission, would hte social harm have occurred when it did? if yes, defendant is not hte but for cause

17
Q

proximate causation

A

intervening act of causal significance occurs after Ds voluntary act but before any social harm occurs
- third party
act of nature
act or omission to act of victim

18
Q

prox causation tests: commmon law

A

foreseeability (responsive v coincidental acts)

apparent safety

free deliberate informed human intervention test

intended consequences

19
Q

responsive intervening act (foreseeability)

A

act is response to situation D created (actions of civim, actions of bystander, actions of medical personal)

presumptively foreseeble

20
Q

coincidental act

A

d places victim in a place wehre it is possible she could be acted on by intervening act

presumptively unforeseeable = not criminally liable

21
Q

apparent safety doctrine

A

has thevictim reached a point of apparent safety

if so, intiatl wrong doer is relieved from criminal responsibility

22
Q

free deliberate informed human intervention test

A

decision making on the part of the victim- free will

23
Q

intended consequences test

A

looking backwards from social harm until a jury finds an actor with the intent to cause harm

24
Q

MPC PROX CAUSE

A

DOES NOT USE PC
concept tied to culpability

instead asks if events are “too remote” or too accidental