Elements of a Crime Flashcards
(24 cards)
crime
actus reus + mens rea+ causation = crime
actus reus
physical part of the crime; act that caused the harm
volitional act: must be a willed muscular action
generally no duty to act
(exceptions for 1. special relationships, 2. duty imposed by contract 3. statutorily created duties 4. whena person creates a risk of harm to another)
result crime
tangible harm like murder (most crimes)
conduct crime
social harm doesnt always have tangible result
DUI
attendant circumstance
fact or condition that exists at the time of conduct or result
mens rea
guilty mind: intent/mental state of actor when committing the social harm
Purposely (mr)
actors CONCIOUS OBJECT to cause the result or perform the act
knowingly
actor is aware that the result is VIRTUALLY CERTAIN to occur for result crime and aware of conduct for conduct crime
intentional acts
purposely and knowingly
recklessly
actor conciously takes a SUBSTANTIAL AND UNJUSTIFIABLE RISK in causing a particular result
negligently
actor inadvertently creates a substantial and unjustifable risk for which he OUGHT TO BE AWARE
- gross deviation from standard of care
- higher degree of negligence than in civil context
knowingly and willful blindness doctrine
willful blindness is a mechanism to impute knwoledge to defendant who is deliberately shielding himself from knowledge of an attendant circumstance
- D must subjectively believe there is a high probability that the fact exists and
- must take deliberate actions to avoid learning of the fact
strict liability offenses
only actus reus needs to be satisfied–> public welfare offenses: environmental violations , food and drug fvilations, traffic offenses and statutory rape
malum prohibitum- conduct that is not necessarily morally wrong but could impact health and safety
specific intent crimes
require special mental element in addition to mental state required for the crime
-knowingly in possession of drug WITH INTENT TO DISTRIBUTE
General intent crimes
only have one mental state and it relates solely to the social harm of the crime
batttery
actual causation
factual causation
but for test- but for the defendants voluntary act or omission, would hte social harm have occurred when it did? if yes, defendant is not hte but for cause
proximate causation
intervening act of causal significance occurs after Ds voluntary act but before any social harm occurs
- third party
act of nature
act or omission to act of victim
prox causation tests: commmon law
foreseeability (responsive v coincidental acts)
apparent safety
free deliberate informed human intervention test
intended consequences
responsive intervening act (foreseeability)
act is response to situation D created (actions of civim, actions of bystander, actions of medical personal)
presumptively foreseeble
coincidental act
d places victim in a place wehre it is possible she could be acted on by intervening act
presumptively unforeseeable = not criminally liable
apparent safety doctrine
has thevictim reached a point of apparent safety
if so, intiatl wrong doer is relieved from criminal responsibility
free deliberate informed human intervention test
decision making on the part of the victim- free will
intended consequences test
looking backwards from social harm until a jury finds an actor with the intent to cause harm
MPC PROX CAUSE
DOES NOT USE PC
concept tied to culpability
instead asks if events are “too remote” or too accidental