Engagement and Stewardship Flashcards

1
Q

Stewardship - responsibilities of institutional investors

origins from the steward left in charge of an absentee landlord’s estate.

A

the process of intervention to make sure that the value of the assets is enhanced overtime, or at least does not deteriorate through neglect or mismanagement.

It can encompass the buying and selling of assets to maintain value within the fund as a whole, as well as acting as a good owner of assets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Engagement
- voting most visible in AGM
Annual general meetings in public events

A

the way in which investors put into effect their stewardship responsibilities in line with the Principles for Responsible investment RPI 2.

one aspect of good stewardship
is the individual interventions in specific assets to preserve and/or enhance value.

usual definition of engagement

  • a purposeful dialogue with a specific objective in mind
  • pre-supposes something vital: that the engager sets objectives for their engagement at the start of the process, and the dialogue’s purpose is to deliver those objectives over time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

engagement can encompass 包含the full range of issues that affect the long-term values of a business:

A
strategy
capital structure
operational performance and delivery
risk management
pay and 
corporate governance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

a full assessment of operational performance must encompass not only financials, but vital areas relevant to the company’s stakeholders:

A
  • highlighting the long-term health of the business, such as relations with the workforce;
  • establishing a culture that favors long-term value creation
  • dealing openly and fairly with suppliers and customers
  • having proper and effective environmental controls in place
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stewardship and engagement are beneficial because

A

they enhance shareholder value and support investors in the execution of their fiduciary duty.

When done well, they encourage enhanced information flows between investors and investees as the parties discuss and debate issues.

allow to lean from each other and to build relationship, to encourage change where shareholders communicate their perspectives on key issues that the company is facing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Principles for Responsible Investment PRI highlighted 3 ESG engagement dynamics that it believes create value:

A
  • communicative dynamics
  • learning dynamics and
  • political dynamics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

mindset of success being measured against the delivery of pre-agreed objectives fits well in the UK’s
Stewardship Code 2020

A

The Financial Reporting Council, in the code, repeatedly discusses the need for signatories to disclose the outcomes of their engagement work as well as the concrete benefits from stewardship activity for clients and beneficiaries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Engagement is successful only to the extent that

A

it delivers the pre-agreed objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

engagement impact Returns to shareholders activism

A

evidence from a clinical study of the Herms UK Focus Fund

It studies the internal records of Focus Fund team activities and considered their impact both in terms of delivering change at the companies in question and in delivering returns for the investors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the successful engagement activity was followed by positive abnormal financial returns

A

On average, ESG engagement generated an abnormal return of 2.3% in the year after the initial engagement, rising to 7.1% for successful engagements and with no adverse response to unsuccessful engagement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ESG engagement leads to

A

a reduction in downside in risk

the effect is stronger the more successful the engagement is.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Engagement helps investee companies to understand their investors’ expectations

A

allowing them to shape their long-term strategies accordingly to suit them

also enables companies to explain how their approach to sustainability relates to their broader business strategy, and can provide an opportunity for companies to comment on ratings or scores driven by templates that they feel do not reflect the complexity of an issue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defining stewardship and engagement 2019 white paper

A

the Investor Forum provides a framework for understanding the nature and key elements of stewardship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Components of stewardship

A

preserving and enhancing the value of assets with which one has been entrusted

delivery through Investment approach and decision
Allocation of capital in accordance with inv. purpose, mandate and client interests at portfolio and individual asset levels.

Dialogue
Active discussions b/w companies and investors, of which there are two principal forms:

  1. monitoring
    Dialogue for inv. purposes:
    to understand the company, its stakeholders and performance.
    Informs incremental buy/sell/hold decisions
  2. Engagement
    Purposeful dialogue with a specific and targeted objective to achieve change.
    Individual or collective basis, as appropriate.

typified by
detailed and specific questioning; investor seeking insights
two-way dialogue; investors expressing opinions

Characteristics of high-quality delivery

  • Frame by close understanding of nature of company and drivers of its business model and LT opportunity to prosper
  • appropriately resourced, so dialogue can be delivered professionally in the context of full understanding of individual company
  • Dialogue must be consistent, direct and honest
  • Dialogue is respectful and seeks to build mutual trust
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Monitoring dialogues

A

are the conversations between investors and mgmt to more fully understand performance and opportunity, which are typified by detailed questions from the investors and which are likely to inform buy, sell or hold inv. decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Engagement dialogues

A

are conversations between investors and any level of the investee entity featuring a two-way sharing of perspectives, such that the investors express their position on key issues, and in particular, highlight any concerns that they may have.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

distinct between monitoring dialogue and genuine engagement shows

A

the ways in which stewardship can sometimes be ineffective or inappropriate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The delivery of concrete outcomes is core to the ‘why’ of engament

A

Effective engagement generates change and, if the intended engagement outcomes have been chosen well, that change will preserve and enhance long-term value at the company subject to the engagement itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

high quality delivery require that it:

A

is set in an appropriate context of long-term ownership and has a focus on long-term value preservation and creation, so that the engagement is aligned with the investment thesis.

is framed by a close understanding of the nature of the company and the driers of its business model and long-term opportunity to prosper

recognizes that change is a process and that, while haste may at times be necessary, change should not be inappropriately rushed

employs consistent, direct and honest message and dialogue

is appropriately resourced so that it can be delivered professionally in the context of a full understanding if the individual company

uses resources efficiently so that engagement coverage is as broad as possible whilst using all the tools available, including collective engagement and

involves reflection so that lessons are learned in order to improve future engagement activity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The Investor Forum

A

A UK group set up to facilitate collective dialogue between investors and investees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Walker Report ushered in a new era of shareholder engagement

A

the report formally called for the Financial Reporting Council FRC to issue a stewardship code to provide a framework for shareholder engagement and was to be reinfored by a FSA financial services authority.

requirement that any registered fund manager must make a statement as to whether and how it approached its principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

1st stewardship code 2010 Stewardship Code
largely unchanged from the existing Statement of Principles on the Responsibilities of Institutional Shareholders and Agents issued by the Institutional shareholders Committee

A

7 principals:

Institutional investors should:
publicly disclose their policy on how they will discharge their stewardship responsibilities

have a robust policy on managing conflicts of interest in relation to stewardship and this policy should be publicly disclosed

monitor their investee companies

establish clear guidelines on when and how they will escalate their activities as a method of protecting and enhancing shareholder value

be willing to act collectively with other investors where appropriate

have a clear policy on voting and disclosure of voting activity

report periodically on their stewardship and voting activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Global codes

A

ICGN Global Stewardship Principles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Europe -

A

European Fund and Asset Management Association Stewardship Code 2018

25
Q

Australia

A

Australian Asset Owner Stewardship Code

26
Q

Brazil

A

AMEC Stewardship code

27
Q

Japan

A

Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors

28
Q

Singapore

A

Singapore Stewardship Principles

29
Q

USA

A

Investor Stewardship Group Stewardship Principles

30
Q

Code revision 2020 of UK Stewardship Code

Outcomes

A

12 principles
biggest change - increased ambition for practical delivery by signatories. 签署人

investors are now expected to report annually on activity, and the outcomes from that activity.

the 12 new principles fall into 4 categories and cover 2 distinct functions:

1-8 address the foundations for stewardship
9-12 focus on the practical discharge of engagement responsibilities

31
Q

Principle 7 & 8 require

A

the integration of ESG factors into the investment process and include an effective oversight of service providers.

32
Q

Principles 9 -12 cover engagement activities

A

intended outcome of these principles is to show substantive change at companies as a result of the engagement activity.

33
Q

most challenging of the 12 is principle 4

A

charges signatories with identifying and responding to market-wide and systemic risks

only Australian Council of Superannuation Investors ACSI has a similar expectation:

Asset owners should encourage better alignment of the operation of the financial system and regulatory policy with the interests of long-term investors.”

34
Q

Japanese Code

A

to extend coverage to all asset classes, not only equity

to incorporate sustainability and ESG

to add encouragement for asset owners to become involved in stewardship, and provide a little more clarity on their role in the stewardship hierarchy, and

to clarify the position of service providers in the hierarchy, and add higher expectations of proxy advisers.

35
Q

The main body of the principles between original and provisions usually call for

A
  1. regular monitoring of investee companies
  2. active engagement where relevant
  3. thoughtfully intelligent voting
36
Q

2 principles that are sometimes but not always present require:

A
  1. investors to manage their conflicts of interest regarding stewardship matters
  2. the escalation of stewardship activity to include a willingness to act collective with other institutional investors
37
Q

out of 300 signatories in total

A

120 were deemed to be tier a and best practice

38
Q

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974US ERISA legislation

A

expectations with regard to stewardship are set by legislation as well as codes.

39
Q

barriers to effective engagement

A

limited resources
difficulty of reaching consensus
conflicts of interest

40
Q

key mechanisms for the escalation of engagemnt

A

holding additional meetings
operating collectively with other shareholders
proposing new board members

expressing concerns through advisers
meeting with chair or other board members
intervening jointly with other institutions on particular issues
making a public statement in advance of general meetings
submitting resolutions and speaking at general meetings
writing a formal letter setting out concerns
-seeking dialogue with other stakeholders
-formally request a special audit of the company
- taking concern public
- seeking governance improvements
- formally adding the company to an exclusion list

41
Q

major constraint on collective engagement approaches

A

acting in concert rules

42
Q

ways for investors to make voting activity more effective and influential

A

hold an active dialogue with the company ahead of the decision

attend the AGM, perhaps to make a spoken intervention

writing afterwards to highlight the reasons for the voting decisions

43
Q

an active investor concerned about the financial viability of the business is most likely to reflect that concern in their voting on

A

Dividend issue

44
Q

Engagement activities can also be entirely outsourced so specialist stewardship

A

issue-based, top down engagement tends to align more closely with passive or otherwise broadly diversified inv. portfolios.

45
Q

Collective Engagement
most resource-efficient method

challenges: consistency of perspectives within group of investors

A

An essential stewardship capability, identifies 12 diff. forms of engagement

5 of these are individual engament:

  1. generic letter
  2. tailored letter
  3. housekeeping engagement
  4. active private engagement
  5. active public engagement

others are forms of collaborative engagment:
1. informal discussions
2. collaborative campaigns
3. follow-on dialogue
4. soliciting support
solicitaion of broader support for formal publicly state targets
5. group meetings
6. collective engagement
7. concert party
formal agreement with concrete objectives and agreed steps

46
Q

Characteristics of engagement approach:

A

SF1 clear object
objective should be specific and targeted to enable clarity around delivery

SF2 material and strategic
objective should be strategic or governance-led or linked to material strategic and/or governance issues

SF3 bespoke定制
the engagement approach should be bespoke to the target company

47
Q

Characteristics of investor collaboration

A

SF4 effective leadership
participants should have clear leadership with appropriate relationships, skills and knowledge

SF5 scale of coalition 联盟
the scale of coalition gathered should be meaningful

SF6 depth of relationship
the coalition should have a prior relationship and/or cultural awareness of the target company

48
Q

behavioral challenges in working as part of investor coalitions 联盟are significant, including

A
  • the challenge of reaching consensus
  • conflicts of interest
  • competition
49
Q

barriers to engagement success

corp. perspective

A

language barriers and communication issue

lack of continuity in interactions

  • lack of resources, insufficient knowledge to meet investor demands
  • lack of actual ESG policies, parctices and/or results that can be reported externally
  • company bureaucracy preventing changes in internal practices and/or external reporting on practices
  • lack of investor preparation
  • lack of sufficient investor tracking process to determine whether engagement requests have been met
  • changing engagement objectives and targets
50
Q

barriers to engagement success

investor perspective

A

language barriers and communication issue

  • refusaby top executives to be engaged on ESG issues
  • functional/sustainability manager struggles to advance ESG related issues
  • too small a shareholding to attract sufficient attention
  • corp. inability to meet objectives and targets
  • lack of buy-in from clients and/or top management for ESG-related investment activities
  • small, under-resourced ESG team
  • lack of clear engagement policies, objectives and monitoring systems
  • under-developed relationships with key corp. actors
  • difficulty demonstrating materiality of engagement
  • insufficient mechanisms to guarantee asset managers conduct successful engagements
51
Q

escalation tools

A

litigation

52
Q

shareholder resolution as a public engagement

A

a shareholder right in most jurisdictions

53
Q

forms of escalation

A

disinvestment

54
Q

the Investor Forum publishes 10 key features of private collative engagement framework

A
  1. trusted facilitator, not an adviser
  2. opt in/opt out
  3. complementary to members’ direct engagement
  4. confidentiality
  5. nominated key engagement contact
  6. hub and spoke model
  7. no inside information
  8. no-concert party and no-group
  9. heightened procedures
  10. conflict of interest avoidance
55
Q

vote

A

for capital structure and financial viability of the business
: votes in relation to dividends, share buybacks, share issuance or scope for further debt burden

for effectiveness or diversity of the board concern:
vote decisions on director re-election

for independence or effectives of the audit process:
vote on the reappointment of the auditor

56
Q

PRI’s guide to ESG engagement for FI investors:

A

managing risk
enhancing returns
based on:

  • the size of a holding in the portfolio
  • lower credit quality issuers
  • key themes that are material to sectors and
  • issuers with low ESG scores
57
Q

PRI recommends that investors consider 8 potential mechanisms to act as engaged owners in infrastrucure:

A
  1. use ESG assessment undertaken during due diligence
  2. include material ESG risks and opportunities identified during due diligence into the post-acquasition plan of each asset/project company and integrate this into asset management activities
  3. engage with and encourage the management of the businss to act on the identified ESG risks and opportunities using the mechanisms available
  4. define and communicate the expectation of ESG operations and maintenance performance to the infrastrucure business managers
  5. ensure ESG factors identified as material during due diligence as explicitly woven into asset-level policies
  6. advocate a governance framework that clearly articulates who has responsibility for ESG and sustainability
  7. set performance targets for preserving or improving environmental and social impact, including regular reports to the board and investors
  8. where possible, make ESG information and expertise available to the asset or project company to help it develop capacity
58
Q

UNEP FI recommends that real estate investment stakeholders:

A

engage, directly or indirectly, on public policy to manage risk

support research on ESG and climate risk

support sector initiatives to develop resources to understand risks and integrate ESG