Entire Section 1: Early Years of the Weimar Republic Flashcards

1
Q

What was the impact of Territorial losses for Germany as a result of the TOV? What did Germany lose?

A

1) The treaty removed over 13% of German territory and all Germany’s overseas colonies.
2) Germany lost colonies such as Alsace-Lorraine, Eupen and Malmedy and more.
3) Germany also lost 75% of its iron ore, 68% of its zinc ore, 26% of its coal and 15% of its arable land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the impact of the Disarmament of Germany as a result of the TOV?

A

1) Germany had to surrender all heavy weapons and dismantle fortifications in the Rhineland and on the island of Heligoland.
2) Conscription to the German armed forces was forbidden and the German army was restricted to a max of 100,000 men and was forbidden to use tanks or gas.
3) German navy was limited to 15,000 men. It was allowed a maximum of 6 battleships but no submarines and small number of coastal defence vessels.
4) Germany was forbidden from having an air force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the impact of War Guilt as a result of the TOV?

A

1) Under Article 231 of the treaty, Germany had to accept responsibility for starting the war.
2) The war guilt clause made Germany liable to pay reparations to the Allies to cover the costs of damage suffered in the war.
3) The final amount of reparations was fixed by a commission in 1921 at £6.6 billion.
4) Germany also had to hand over to the Allies most of its merchant shipping fleet, railway locomotives and rolling stock.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did the TOV mean for the Rhineland and for the Saarland?

A

1) The left bank of the Rhine and a 50km strip on the right bank was permanently demilitarised. An Allied army occupation was based in the Rhineland to ensure Germany fulfilled its treaty obligations.
2) - The Saarland, which contained rich reserves of coal was separated from Germany and was placed under the control of the League of Nations for 15 years.
- Germany would also supply France, Belgium and Italy with free coal as part of the reparation agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Were there any other terms to the TOV?

A

1) Austria was forbidden from uniting with Germany.
2) Germany was forbidden from joining the new League of Nations.
3) Kaiser and other Germans were to be put on trial for war crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did the German public react to the TOV?

A

1) The TOV was greeted with horror and disbelief by the majority of Germans.
2) Came as a profound shock to Germans, since in early 1918, victory for Germany seemed to be a matter of time. Civilians and ordinary soldiers were not told how desperate the military situation was.
3) There was almost universal resentment at the harsh terms and few Germans would accept moral responsibility for fulfilling the treaty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the German objections to the TOV primarily focus on?

A

1) War guilt clause was seen as unjust national humiliation since Germans believed that they had been forced into a just war against the Allies, who had attempted to encircle Germany.
2) Reparations were a cause of anger, Germans felt that the level was too high and would cripple the German economy.
3) Allied occupation of Western Germany, and the French control of the Saarland coal mines led to friction.
4) Disarming of Germany and its exclusion from the league of nations were seen as unjust discrimination against a once proud and powerful nation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Provide 5 arguments as to why the German reaction to the TOV was based on unrealistic expectations.

A

1) President Wilson’s 14 points & the armistice agreed that Alsace-Lorraine would be returned to France, and that a new state of Poland with access to the sea would be created, and that considerable German disarmament would be expected.
2) Treaty was not as severe as it might have been. The French wanted to make sure that the German’s could never threaten them again, but other Allies resisted this as they wanted Germany to remain strong enough to withstand the spread of communism in Russia.
3) The treaty did not punish the Germans as much as the Germans had punished Russia in the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918.
4) Germany’s war aims of 1914 had included annexation of territory from its enemies, the expansion of Germany’s colonial empire and a very severe reparations bill to be paid by the Allies. If the result had been the other way round, reparations for the Allies would be just as bad.
5) Reparations bill was much lower than demanded by the French.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the reaction from pro-republican parties to the TOV?

A

1) The SPD and its allies in government in 1919 were well aware that signing it would rebound upon them.
2) They also took the view that the most sensible course of action in the coming years was to outwardly comply with the terms of the treaty whilst negotiating modifications to it. (Policy of fulfilment).
3) The TOV turned some people against the Weimar Republic. The treaty caused political demoralisation at the very centre of government, associating the Republic with weakness and failure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the reaction from the right to the TOV?

A

1) Right-wing resentment of the Republic was intensified by the signing of the TOV. Germans could not accept military defeat, nor the establishment of a new republic.
2) The signing of the peace settlement was the final straw and led many to join nationalist groups in attempts to overthrow the Republic.
3) In the eyes of extreme nationalists, the politicians who now governed Germany lacked any legitimacy because they had betrayed the ‘fatherland’ several times.- in the dethroning of the Kaiser, the signing of the armistice and the acceptance of the TOV.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the right wing call the government that signed the TOV and what did they come up with as an excuse?

A

1) The right wing blamed the government in charge of betraying the Fatherland and therefore they called them the ‘November Criminals’.
2) The fact that the politicians had betrayed the fatherland became known as the ‘stab in the back’ myth. This myth was used as justification for continued nationalist attacks on the Republic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who did the ‘stab in the back’ myth appeal to?

A

1) It was particularly appealing to ex-soldiers who had suffered in fighting for what they regarded as a noble cause and had then experienced insults and humiliation when they returned to a Germany in the throes of revolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Were all soldiers who returned to Germany hostile to the new republic?

A

1) No. Many working class soldiers supported the new democratic system. They had been part of trade unions and supported the SPD.
2) Others gravitated to communism and some could not adjust to civilian life since they found difficulty in finding employment and yearned for the purpose that the war years had given them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did the British react to the TOV?

A

1) When Prime Minister Lloyd George returned to London after signing the Treaty, he was given a rapturous reception from a large crowd.
2) The British public were mostly satisfied that Germany had lost its overseas empire, along with its large fleet and would be unable to threaten European peace for a generation.
3) However, Lloyd George privately believed that Germany should not be sp weak so that it couldn’t resist the western expansion of the USSR, and he wanted Germany to become a strong trading partner with Britain again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

1) What did British John Maynard Keynes describe the TOV as?
2) What did French Marshal Foch describe the TOV as?

A

1) “ Was one of the most serious acts of political unwisdom for which our statesmen have ever been responsible”
2) “This is not peace. It is an armistice for 20 years”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did France react to the TOV?

A

1) The French felt that they had suffered the most out of all the combatant nations and they were determined to seek revenge at Versailles.
2) Despite the recovery of Alsace-Lorraine and the demilitarisation of Germany, there were many in France who regarded the treaty as being too lenient on Germany, and PM Clemenceau, who was blamed for making too many concessions, was defeated in the 1920 election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How did the USA react to the TOV?

A

1) Reactions to the TOV were generally negative.
2) Widespread opinion that the TOV had been unfair on Germany and that Britain and France had used the TOV to enrich themselves at Germany’s expense.
3) The Republicans in Congress opposed the treaty, leaving the USA to make a separate peace deal with Germany in 1921.
4) As a result, the USA refused to join the League of Nations, and in the 1920’s, retreated from involvement in European affairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How was the Weimar Republic established?

A

1) By the end of September 1918 it was clear that Germany was on the brink of defeat. In order for Germany to be able to a better peace deal with the Allies, General Ludendorff advocated a partial democratisation of the political system in Germany.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain what the October Reforms were. What was done?

A

1) In October 1918, following the recommendations of Ludendorff the Kaiser began a series of reforms that effectively ended his autocratic rule.
2) -Appointed Prince Max of Baden as Chancellor of Germany.
- The Chancellor was to be responsible to the Reichstag and he established a new government based on the majority parties in the Reichstag, including the SPD.
- The armed forces were put under the control of the civil government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When did Chancellor Max write to President Wilson asking for an armistice?

A

1) October 3rd 1918.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did the German public react when they heard about the armistice?

A

1) The news that Max’s government was asking for an armistice was a shattering blow to the moral of the German people and to their armed forces.
2) The peace note was an admission that Germany had lost the war, and was the first occasion on which the German people had learned the truth about their country’s hopeless military situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What effectively catalysed the Revolution of 1918?

A

1) When the German Navy’s high command ordered ships to attack British ships,
on 30th October, the crews of two cruisers refused to obey orders. This naval mutiny was the beginning of a much broader revolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Provide 4 events that took place during the November revolution

A

1) Unrest in the navy spread to the main German base at Kiel on the 3rd of November 1918, where sailors mutinied against their officers and took control of the base.
2) On the following day the revolt spread to the city and workers and soldiers’ councils were setup. Despite efforts from the government to meet the mutineers’ demands, the revolt spread to more cities.
3) Once the authority of military officers, government officials and police had been successfully challenged, on November 8th a republic was proclaimed in Bavaria which was seen as the ‘decisive moment’ in the Revolution.
4) On November 9th the SPD called on workers in Berlin to join a general strike to force the Kaiser to abdicate. They also threatened to withdraw support from Prince Max’s government unless the Kaiser abdicated within 24 hours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What happened when the Kaiser refused to resign per the demand of the SPD?

A

1) Chancellor Max knew he could not continue to govern with the SPD so therefore he released a press statement saying that the Kaiser had abdicated.
2) On the same day, Max resigned from Chancellor.

25
Q

Who replaced Max as the Chancellor of Germany?

A

1) Friedrich Ebert, the leader of the SPD replaced Max.
2) At roughly the same time, another leading figure of the SPD stood on the Reichstag of the balcony and declared that the German Republic was now in existence.

26
Q

What did the survival of Ebert’s government depend on?

A

1) The survival of Ebert’s government depended on the support of the army.

27
Q

What led to the government working with the army, and why would have army officials normally steered away from the government?

A

1) Due to the extreme political situation, the army was more concerned about a Bolshevik revolution rather than not wanting a democracy in Germany.

28
Q

What was the Ebert-Groener Pact?

A

1) On November 10th 1918, General Groener phoned Ebert to assure him that the army leadership would support the government.
2) In return, Groener demanded that Ebert should resist the demands of the soldiers’ councils to democratise the army and defend Germany against communist revolution.
3) Ebert assured Groener that the government was determined to resist further revolution and to uphold the existing command structure in the army.

29
Q

Provide 3 events to exemplify how there were still issues and doubt that the government could contain the revolution?

A

1) On December 6th 1918, a Spartacist demonstration in Berlin was fired on by soldiers, killing 16.
2) On 23-24 December a sailor’s revolt against the government in Berlin was put down by the army. In protest the three USPD ministers in the government resigned.
3) On Jan 6th 1919 the Spartacists launched an armed revolt against the government in what became known as the Januray revolution, or the Spartacist uprising. After a week of fighting the revolt was crushed.

30
Q

Provide 5 strengths of the Weimar Constitution.

A

1) The new German constitution provided a wider right to vote than in countries such as Britain and France. Women were able to vote on the same terms as men and they were allowed to become deputies in the Reichstag and state parliaments.
2) The system of proportional representation enabled even the smaller parties to win seats in the Reichstag and influence government decisions. The country was divided into 35 electoral districts each with roughly. a million voters.
3) There was full democracy in local government as well as central government. Unlike in the second empire, the largest state, Prussia was not in a position to dominate the rest of Germany.
4) The constitution also set out clearly the rights of the individual. The ‘fundamental rights and duties of German citizens were guaranteed in the second part of the constitution.’
5) Referendums could be called for by the president, the Reichstrat or by people’s request if a tenth of the electorate applied for one.

31
Q

Provide 4 weaknesses of the Weimar Constitution.

A

1) The proliferation of small parties: Smaller parties could gain representation in the Reichstag, which enabled smaller anti-republican parties to exploit the parliamentary system to gain publicity.
2) Coalition governments: Due to the proliferation of smaller parties, none of the larger parties could gain an overall majority in the Reichstag. Since governments had to command majority support in the Reichstag, all governments in the Weimar Republic were coalitions, many of which were short lived.
3) Article 48 of the Weimar Constitution enriched the power of the President. This would lead to the possibility of abusing power. Ebert used it more than 100 times, emphasising the fact that even though people had fought so hard for democracy, there was a democratic fault in the system.
4) The judiciary and civil service were mostly staffed by people who did not support the republic. Led to anyone attacking the government on the left to be severely punished, but anyone who attacked the government from the right received lenient punishments. Shows a lack of justice.

32
Q

What risky German tactic had led to government growing? What did this tactic depend on?

A

1) German wartime governments chose to finance the war through increased borrowing and by printing more money.
2) This meant that government debt grew and the value of the currency fell.
3) The tactic depended on Germany winning the war and would be able to recoup its losses through forcing the Allies to pay harsh reparations.

33
Q

What 2 things could the German government have done due to reduce national debt?

A

1) Raise taxes or reduce spending.

34
Q

What were the issues with the 2 things the German government could have done to reduce national debt?

A

1) Increasing taxes would have risked alienating support foe the new republic as anti republican parties would be able to claim that taxes were being raised to pay reparations to the Allies.
2) It was difficult to reduce public spending, since there were civil servants to be paid.

35
Q

Where did unemployment in Germany stand in 1921?

A

1) Unemployment in Germany had virtually disappeared and this led to a rapid rise in economic activity.

36
Q

What had happened to inflation between 1913 and 1920?

A

1) Prices had doubled between 1918-1919 and had quadrupled between 1919 and 1920.
2) Inflation was 14x higher in 1920 than it was in 1913.

37
Q

What did these levels of inflation ultimately lead to?

A

1) Hyperinflation.

38
Q

What led to the French occupation of the Ruhr?

A

1) By the end of 1922 Germany had fallen seriously behind in its payment of reparations to France in the form of coal.
2) This prompted the French together with the Belgians to send a military force of 60,000 men to occupy the Ruhr industrial area in January 1923 in order to make the Germans comply with the TOV.

39
Q

What was the aim of the French occupation of the Ruhr? What did they accomplish?

A

1) Their aim was to seize the areas coal, steel and manufactured goods as reparations.
2) They took control of all the mines, factories, steelworks and railways, demanded food from the shops and set up machine gun posts in the streets.

40
Q

What did Germany do in response to the French occupation of the Ruhr?

A

1) A policy of passive resistance wad adopted where nobody living in the area would cooperate with the French.

41
Q

What did the German government promise the locals during the French occupation of the Ruhr?

A

1) They were promised that their wages would continue if they went on strike while paramilitary troops working with the German army secretly organised acts of sabotage against the French.

42
Q

What did the paramilitary groups do and what did this lead to?

A

1) In order to disrupt the French effort they blew up railways, sank barges and destroyed bridges.
2) In response the scale of the French operation grew. They setup military courts and punished mine owners, miners and civil servants who would not comply with their authority.

43
Q

How many Germans were shot during the occupation of the Ruhr?

A

1) 132 Germans were shot.

44
Q

Why were the economic effects so harsh due to the occupation of the Ruhr? Provide 4 points.

A

1) Paying the wages or providing goods for striking workers was a further drain on government finances.
2) Tax revenue was lost from those whose businesses were closed and workers who became unemployed.
3) Germany had to import coal and pay for it from the limited foreign currency reserves within the country.
4) Shortage of goods pushed prices further up.

45
Q

What did hyperinflation mean for Germany?

A

1) Money lost its meaning as prices soared to unimaginable levels.
2) Printing presses worked tirelessly to keep banks supplied with worthless paper money.

46
Q

How did the public react when they received their wages during the hyperinflation crisis?

A

1) Workers collected their wages and salaries in wheelbarrows and shopping baskets and tried to spend their money as fast as possible before prices rose even further

47
Q

Which aspect of hyperinflation had the most serious effect?

A

1) The rising prices for food had the most serious effects.

2) Food began to run short as speculators hoarded supplies in anticipation of higher prices in the future.

48
Q

What did shortages in food lead to?

A

1) Led to breakdown in law, there were food riots when crowds looted shops, and gangs of city dwellers travelled to the countryside to take food from farms, but were confronted by angry farmers determined to protect their livelihoods.

49
Q

Provide the 4 social reforms that took place during the hyperinflation crisis.

A

1) 1919- A law was passed limiting the working day to a maximum of 8 hours.
2) 1919- The state health insurance system, introduced by Bismarck but limited to workers in employment, was extended to include wives, daughters and the disabled.
3) 1919- Aid for War veterans incapable of working because of injury became the responsibility of national government, aid for war widows and orphans was also increased.
4) 1922- National Youth Welfare Act required all local authorities to set up youth offices with responsibility for child protection and decreed that all children had the right to an education.

50
Q

Who were the 6 winners of the hyperinflation crisis?

A

1) There were black-marketers who bought up food stocks and sold them at vastly inflated prices.
2) Those who had debts, mortgages and loans did well since they could pay off the money they owed in worthless currency.
3) Hyperinflation also helped enterprising business people who took out new loans and repaid them once the currency had devalued further.
4) Those leasing property on long term fixed rents gained because the real value of the rents were paying decreased.
5) Owners of foreign exchange and foreigners living in Germany could also benefit.
6) In the countryside, most farmers coped well since food was in demand and money was less important in rural communities.

51
Q

Who were the 6 losers of the Hyperinflation crisis?

A

1) Pensioners were particularly badly hit, including war widows living on state pensions.
2) Those who had patriotically lent money to the government in wartime by purchasing fixed interest rate ‘war bonds’ also lost out because the interest payments decreased in value.
3) Landlords reliant on fixed rents were hit badly.
4) The unskilled and those who did not belong to trade unions fared the worst. By 1923 there was an increase in unemployment and short-time working, and by the end of 1923 only 29.3% of the population was employed.
5) Artisans and small business owners- the Mittelstand - were badly hit. Their costs rose and the prices they charged could not keep pace with inflation.
6) The sick were very badly hit. The costs of medical care increased whilst the rapid rise in food prices led to widespread malnutrition. Death rates in large cities increased. The suicide rate also went up.

52
Q

What was the Spartacist Uprising? When was it? What happened? Was it well supported?

A

1) January 5th 1919 led by Rosa Luxembourg and Karl Liebknecht staged an armed uprising in Berlin to overthrow Ebert’s government and set up a revolutionary communist regime.
2) They were able to take some buildings and newspaper offices.
3) The revolt was poorly planned and badly supported, since the Spartacists had not secured the support of the majority of the working class in Berlin (the name in which they said to be acting in).
4) General Groener had few military units to use, so used the irregular units of the new Freikorps.
5) By Jan 13th 1919 the rising had been crushed after brutal street fighting.

53
Q

Provide info on left wing uprisings in March 1919, April 1919, 1920, March 1921 and 1923.

A

1) March 1919- another spartacist rising in Berlin, a communist government based on workers’ councils was established. Both surpressed.
2) April 1919- wave of strikes in Halle and the Ruhr valley. The strikers demanded more control over their own industries and a government based on workers councils.
3) 1920- troubles continued. Communists formed a ‘red army’ of 50,000 workers and seized control of the Ruhr. Virtual civil war began.
4) March 1921- The KPD tried to force a revolution, beginning with a rising in Saxony. The strike disruption spread to Hamburg and the Ruhr, but the risings were crushed by police. 145 killed.
5) 1923- Further bout of strike activity at the time of Germany’s economic collapse. Centered in Saxony and Hamburg, but it also surpressed.

54
Q

What was the Kapp Putsch? What happened? When? What was the impact of it?

A

1) -The government was obliged to put into effect the terms of the TOV by January 1920, and needed to reduce the size of the army.
- Gustav Noske ordered 2 Freikorps units to disband, however General Luttwitz refused to disband one of them. Government ordered his arrest, and he decided to march his troops to Berlin in protest and other sympathetic officers offered their support..
- Luttwitz also had the support of Wolfgang Kapp who wanted to plan a putsch.
- The situation appeared dangerous but there was actually considerable tension between the military and civilian elements of the putsch and it failed to gain widespread support, even from the right wing.
- Putsch was put down in 4 days. Kapp and Luttwitz were forced to flee.
2) The putsch had taught that the army was not to be trusted, civil servants could be disloyal, the workers as a group could show their power, and that without the army, the Weimar Republic was weak.

55
Q

When was the assassination of Erzberger? Who killed him? Why was he killed?

A

1) August 1921, former finance minister Matthais Erzberger was assassinated in Black Forest
2) He was killed two members of the Organisation Council.
3) He had led the German delegation for the signing of the TOV and had signed the TOV. He was also Germany’s representative on the reparations committee.

56
Q

When was the assassination of Rathenau? Who killed him? Why was he killed?

A

1) 24th June 1922, foreign minister Walther Rathenau was killed.
2) Killed by 4 assassins from the Organisation council.
3) Rathenau’s crimes were to be a jew and a leading minister in the Republican government. He also participated in the signing of the armistice and had negotiated with the Allies to improve the TOV.

57
Q

How many political assassinations were there between 1919 and 1923? What did the Reichstag do in an attempt to halt the rising figure?

A

1) There were 376 political assassinations, 22 by the left and the remained by the right.
2) In July 1922 the Reichstag passed a law ‘for the protection of the Republic’ which imposed severe penalties on those involved in conspiracy to murder and banned extremist organisations.

58
Q

In what way was the arrogance of anti-republican nationalists bolstered?

A

1) The fact that only one right wing murderer was convicted compared to 10 left wing murderers who were sentenced to death. It showed that they could get away from murder, since the Weimar politicians seemed constantly to exaggerate the threat from the left and to underestimate that from the right.

59
Q

What happened during the Beer Hall Putsch in Munich? When was it? What were the lessons to be taken away from it?

A

1) - November 1923, Hitler made a bit to seize power. He knew that in order to succeed he needed the support of big names, so he was able to get the support of Ludendorff. -He also set out to win over von Losson and von Kahr.
- November 8th, he stormed into a Munich Beer Hall. At a gunpoint, von Kahr and von Lossow were persuaded to agree with Hitler’s plan to march in Berlin.
- However their support evaporated overnight, and the Stormtroopers were unable to gain control of the Munich army barracks. Clear by the next day that Hitler’s plans had failed.
- He still went along with the plan and marched through Munich, but his companion was shot and he dislocated his shoulder.
- He was captured and arrested the day after. Ludendorff gave himself up to the police.
2) It was in November 1923.
3) Incident showed the importance of the army to the political survival. Nazi’s were banned and Hitler was put in prison. The Republic survived.