Eristische Dialektik Flashcards

TEst (38 cards)

1
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

17
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

18
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

19
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

20
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

21
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

22
Q

Key Indicators:
Opponent’s claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal.

Example:
‘We should regulate industry waste.’ → ‘So you want to shut down factories?’

A

Tactic Name: The Extension
Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily.

Defense Strategy:
Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.

23
Q

Key Indicators:
Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument.

Example:
‘Faith is important in love.’ → ‘So you reject science?’

A

Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation
Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument.

Defense Strategy:
Clarify definitions. Ask: ‘What exactly do you mean by that word?’

24
Q

Key Indicators:
Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim.

Example:
‘This tax helped in Norway’ → ‘So socialism works everywhere?’

A

Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation
Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule.

Defense Strategy:
Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.

25
Key Indicators: Opponent's claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal. Example: 'We should regulate industry waste.' → 'So you want to shut down factories?'
Tactic Name: The Extension Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily. Defense Strategy: Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.
26
Key Indicators: Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument. Example: 'Faith is important in love.' → 'So you reject science?'
Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument. Defense Strategy: Clarify definitions. Ask: 'What exactly do you mean by that word?'
27
Key Indicators: Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim. Example: 'This tax helped in Norway' → 'So socialism works everywhere?'
Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule. Defense Strategy: Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.
28
Key Indicators: Opponent's claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal. Example: 'We should regulate industry waste.' → 'So you want to shut down factories?'
Tactic Name: The Extension Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily. Defense Strategy: Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.
29
Key Indicators: Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument. Example: 'Faith is important in love.' → 'So you reject science?'
Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument. Defense Strategy: Clarify definitions. Ask: 'What exactly do you mean by that word?'
30
Key Indicators: Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim. Example: 'This tax helped in Norway' → 'So socialism works everywhere?'
Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule. Defense Strategy: Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.
31
Key Indicators: Opponent's claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal. Example: 'We should regulate industry waste.' → 'So you want to shut down factories?'
Tactic Name: The Extension Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily. Defense Strategy: Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.
32
Key Indicators: Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument. Example: 'Faith is important in love.' → 'So you reject science?'
Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument. Defense Strategy: Clarify definitions. Ask: 'What exactly do you mean by that word?'
33
Key Indicators: Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim. Example: 'This tax helped in Norway' → 'So socialism works everywhere?'
Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule. Defense Strategy: Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.
34
Key Indicators: Opponent's claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal. Example: 'We should regulate industry waste.' → 'So you want to shut down factories?'
Tactic Name: The Extension Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily. Defense Strategy: Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.
35
Key Indicators: Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument. Example: 'Faith is important in love.' → 'So you reject science?'
Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument. Defense Strategy: Clarify definitions. Ask: 'What exactly do you mean by that word?'
36
Key Indicators: Uses a narrow case to support a universal claim. Example: 'This tax helped in Norway' → 'So socialism works everywhere?'
Tactic Name: Hasty Generalisation Core Mechanism: Treats a specific case as proof of a general rule. Defense Strategy: Ask for broader evidence. Point out contextual differences.
37
Key Indicators: Opponent's claim is exaggerated or misrepresented before rebuttal. Example: 'We should regulate industry waste.' → 'So you want to shut down factories?'
Tactic Name: The Extension Core Mechanism: Turns a specific claim into an extreme version to refute it more easily. Defense Strategy: Stay calm and repeat the original phrasing. Ask them to quote you exactly.
38
Key Indicators: Shifts meaning of a term mid-argument. Example: 'Faith is important in love.' → 'So you reject science?'
Tactic Name: Ambiguity / Equivocation Core Mechanism: Exploits words with multiple meanings to twist the argument. Defense Strategy: Clarify definitions. Ask: 'What exactly do you mean by that word?'