ethical implications of research studies / theory, social sensitivity Flashcards
(28 cards)
what are ethical implications?
the consequences of psychological research (studies and theories) for
individuals, groups and wider society
(not the same as ethical issues)
who can psychology have ethical implications on?
-the public
-social policy
-the economy
-politics
-legislation
examples of research studies with ethical implications:
Milgram → the ppts were deceived and distressed
who did Milgram’s study affect?
-the individuals in the study
-psychology as a whole
the way Milgram’s study affected individuals:
-the participants were debriefed after the experiment and a follow-up interview took place a year later
-rhe outcome of these follow-up interviews suggested that the
participants had suffered no long-term effects
the way Milgram’s study affected psychology as a whole:
the reputation of psychology was damaged
examples of theories with ethical implications:
Bowlby’s Theory of Attachment → suggests that children form one
special attachment bond, usually with their mother, which must
take place within a critical period
Bowlby also suggested that this attachment bond affects their
future relationships through an internal working model
who can Bowlby’s monotropic theory affect?
mothers → it has encouraged the view that a women’s place is at home with her children, which could make some mothers feel guilty for wanting to return to work, after
childbirth
discussion point - ethical implications
some theories can have positive ethical implications
some theories can have positive ethical implications
P - some theories can have positive ethical implications
E - Bowlby’s work has positively affected social policy
↳ MDH - Bowlby has led to hospital visiting hours that allows children to see their parents
L - ethical implications aren’t inherently negative
what is socially sensitive research?
some psychological research is more controversial (about race, gender, criminality) and attracts more attention, research is socially sensitive if it has consequences on a social group
who can socially sensitive research impact?
Sieber & Stanley state:
-members of the social group being studied (e.g. race, ethnic group)
-friends and relatives of those taking part in the study
-the research team
-the institution in which the research is conducted
examples of effects on members of the social group being studied (e.g. race, ethnic group):
early research on IQ was used to discriminate against African Americans → test just before WWI which was used to select who would be a part of the teams, the effects are still lasting
examples of effects on friends and relatives of those taking part in the study:
Genie’s mother was judged due to Genie’s mistreatment coming to light after she was found, however, Genie’s mother tried to help her
examples of effects on the research team:
teams who research into gender are often criticised and have been ousted from universities
examples of effects on the institution in which the research is conducted:
Stanford had a negative reputation following its association with to the SPE / Romanian orphanages affected institutions
four aspects in the process of socially sensitive research that raise ethical implications:
Sieber & Stanley state:
-the research question
-the methodology used
-the institutional context
-interpretation and application of findings
the research question (SSR)
-research that makes a group in its question is likely to be SSR
-the researcher must consider their research question carefully
the methodology used (SSR)
-participants must be treated ethically
-the researcher needs to consider the treatment of the participant’s and their right to confidentiality and anonymity
the institutional context (SSR)
-the researcher should be mindful of how the data is going to be used and consider who is funding the research
-id the research is funded by a private institution or organisation, why are they funding the research and how do they intend to use the findings?
example of the institutional context (SSR)
the US navy funded the SPE to understand why there was conflict between guards and prisoners
interpretation and application of findings (SSR)
-the researcher needs to consider
how their findings might be interpreted and applied in the real-world
-could their results be used to inform policy?
how to reduce the impact of SSR:
-researchers should not avoid researching socially sensitive issues
-researchers need to be careful to ensure ethical treatment of ppts (consent, debriefs)
-they should be aware of how their findings may be interpreted &
used by others
-they should make the limitations of their research explicit (e.g. ‘the
study was only carried out on white middle class American male
students’,
In a study of antisocial activity and social background, researchers
interviewed 100 children aged 14years. They then classified each
child according to their level of antisocial activity. They concluded
that 26 were ‘very antisocial’, 40 were ‘mildly antisocial’ and 34 were
‘not antisocial’. The researchers found that the majority of the ‘very
antisocial’ children attended Crayford secondary school, whereas
most of the other two groups of children attended another local
school.
- What are some implications of this research?
- How could these issues be dealt with?
1) Researchers should be aware of the implications of their research:
possible negative impact for the children in the sample; possible
negative implications of the research for the reputation of
Crayford school and the wider community; possible self-fulfilling
prophecy of children attending the school.
- Dealing with the issue: Researchers should take adequate steps to counter the above: sensitive briefing/debriefing of participants,
parents, teachers etc; care in relation to publication, disclosure of
results and confidentiality/anonymity.