gender - explanations of gender development Flashcards
(122 cards)
what do cognitive theories suggest about gender development?
-cognition (‘thinking’) has an impact on gender behaviour
-environmental factors and brain development influence cognition and cognition influences gender behaviour
what are the two cognitive explanations for gender development?
-kohlberg’s theory
-gender schema theory
what viewpoint do both cognitive explanations of gender development share?
a child’s mental concept of gender
becomes more sophisticated with age
→ as a child’s cognitive abilities develop, thinking about gender changes
kohlberg’s beliefs about his gender schema theory:
-kohlberg believed that these
stages were universal and that m children go through the same
cognitive development
-any differences in male and
female behaviour was due to
cultural differences in what is
perceived as masculine and
feminine
what did kohlberg suggest?
that children’s sense of gender develops over three stages,
which are gone through gradually
what were kohlberg’s stages of development?
1) gender identity
2) gender stability
3) gender constancy
gender identity/labelling
(ages & features)
age 2 - 3:
-they are able to correctly identify themselves and other people’s sex -they aren’t aware that their sex is permanent/believe it can change
(children begin to think about gender at approx. 2 years)
gender stability
(ages & features)
ages 3 - 4:
-children begin to realise
that their sex will not change over time
-due to being egocentric they do not realise that this also applies to other people
gender constancy:
(ages & features)
ages 6 - 7:
-can see through superficial changes and understand that gender is constant
-they become less egocentric & appreciate that other people
have a different point of view from their own
what else is important about gender constancy?
-kohlberg’s thought that at this time that children actively seek
out role models to imitate to help them develop their sense of gender
-for Kohlberg, once the child has a fully developed and internalised concept of gender at the constancy stage, they embark upon an active search for evidence which confirms that concept
which questions could asked to establish which stage which stage a child is in?
gender identity - which one are you? (when shown a picture of a boy/girl)
gender stability - will you grow up to be a mummy or a daddy?
gender constancy - if you wore (insert opposite sex clothes), would you be a girl or a boy?
strength of kohlberg’s stage theory:
-there is research evidence to support Kohlberg’s stage theory (slaby and frey - 1975)
ao3 / strength - there is research evidence to support Kohlberg’s stage theory (slaby and frey - 1975)
P - there is research evidence to support Kohlberg’s stage theory (slaby and frey - 1975)
E - slaby and frey conducted research to test the accuracy of kohlberg’s theory / they interviewed 55 children between 2-5 years old & asked them questions to find out which stage they were in (eg: ‘where you are little boy or girl when you were a baby / when you grow up will you be a mummy or a daddy?’)
↳ children didn’t recognise that these traits were stable over time until they were 3 or 4 years old, supporting gender stability
criticismsq of kohlberg’s stage theory:
-the age of gender constancy is not always supported in research
-there are methodological issues in the research, which undermines the findings
ao3 / criticism - the age of gender constancy is not always supported in research
P - the age of gender constancy is not always supported in research
E - there is evidence that suggests that many children begin to
demonstrate gender-appropriate behaviour before gender constancy is achieved / researchers found that children as young as 4 reported
‘feeling good’ about playing with gender-appropriate toys and ‘feeling
bad’ about doing the opposite
L - this contradicts kohlberg’s stage theories predictions and so undermines the validity of his theory
↳ this supports gender-schema theory, which suggests that
children begin to absorb gender-appropriate information as soon as
they identify themselves as either male or female at the age of 2-3
ao3 / criticism - there are methodological issues in the research, which undermines the findings
P - there are methodological issues in the research, which undermines the findings
E - kohlberg’s theory was developed using interviews with children who
were sometimes as young as 2 & 3
/ though the questions asked were tailored toward the particular age
group he was dealing with, kohlberg may not have acknowledged that very young children lack the vocabulary required to express understanding
↳ the children may have relatively complex ideas about gender but not the verbal ability to express these – therefore what they express might not truly reflect their understanding
L - this weakens the theory’s evidence and so casts doubt on the theory
who proposed gender schema theory?
Martin and Halverson (1981)
outline of gender schema theory:
it proposes that children acquire their gender identity through the development of gender schemas
what are schemas?
a cluster of beliefs about a topic or concept
what is a gender schema?
a collection of ideas about what it means to be ‘male’ or ‘female’
when does gender schema theory suggest that children
around the age of three, children begin to search for ‘rules’ and create schemas about how males and females should behave
what is the key to gender schema theory?
children aren’t passive in this development
gender schema theory:
1) a child achieves gender identity around 2 to 3 years → they search the environment for information that encourages development of their gender schema
2) the schemas then expand to include a wide range of behaviours and personality traits associated with their gender, young children usually form their schemas around stereotypes
3) stereotypes provide a framework that directs understanding of the self
4) by 6 years old a child has rather fixed and stereotypical ideas about what is appropriate for their gender / children are likely to disregard information that does not fit with their existing schema
children & their own gender:
-children have a much better understanding of the schemas that are appropriate for their own gender → children pay more attention to information relevant to their gender identity, rather than that of the opposite sex
-children find appropriate toys and sports for their gender through the environment