Ethics Flashcards
(183 cards)
Summary: Discussing Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Orders
When a patient reaches the end stages of life, and a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)
order is put in place –
which is a decision made by the healthcare team, not by
the patient or the family-
, it is crucial to have open and compassionate
communication with the family. Healthcare professionals have an ethical
obligation to discuss and explain the reasoning behind the DNR order and provide
support to family members who may struggle to accept the decision.
Healthcare
professionals have a duty to ensure that families are informed and supported,
focusing on the patient’s comfort and dignity in their final stages of life.
Addressing their concerns helps ensure that everyone involved understands the
medical and ethical considerations that shape end-of-life care decisions, while
focusing on the best interests of the patient.
An 81-year-old man with end-stage dementia is admitted to the hospital after a
severe stroke. Despite receiving appropriate medical care, his condition worsens,
and he is now nearing the final stages of life. A Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order
has been put in place, agreed upon by the healthcare team after careful
consideration of his prognosis and the futility of resuscitation. His son, who is his
primary caregiver, is unaware of the DNR order and expresses his wish for
everything to be done to save his father’s life if his condition deteriorates. The
son is distressed and believes that resuscitation should be attempted. What is the
most appropriate next step in managing this situation?
Options:
A) Revoke the DNR order and proceed with resuscitation.
B) File the DNR order without discussing it with the family.
C) Discuss the DNR order with the son and explore his concerns.
D) Seek a second opinion from another consultant.
E) Ask the son to sign a consent form for resuscitation.
Answer → C) Discuss the DNR order with the son and explore his concerns.
In this case, the patient already has a DNR order in place, which was agreed upon
by the healthcare team after determining that resuscitation would not provide
any benefit due to the patient’s advanced dementia and terminal condition.
The
son’s distress and desire for resuscitation reflect the need for a compassionate
and open conversation.
It is crucial to explain the medical rationale behind the DNR order, address the
son’s concerns, and help him understand the reasoning for not pursuing
aggressive interventions at this stage.
Such discussions are essential to ensuring
that the family is aware of the patient’s condition and the medical decisions made
regarding end-of-life care.
Explanation of other options:
A) Revoke the DNR order and proceed with resuscitation.
Revoking the DNR order and resuscitating the patient would not be in line with
A) Revoke the DNR order and proceed with resuscitation.
Revoking the DNR order and resuscitating the patient would not be in line with
the patient’s best interests, as the DNR was put in place due to the futility of
resuscitation in this terminal case.
B) File the DNR order without discussing it with the family.
Filing the DNR without discussing it would dismiss the son’s concerns and
undermine the importance of transparent communication in end-of-life care. This
would not be an ethical approach.
D) Seek a second opinion from another consultant.
Seeking another opinion is not necessary here as the DNR order was made after
careful consideration by the healthcare team, and there is no indication that
another opinion would change the situation.
E) Ask the son to sign a consent form for resuscitation.
The decision to resuscitate or not is a medical decision, and asking the son to sign
a consent form would be inappropriate, especially when a DNR order is already in
place.
A 45-year-old doctor is conducting a routine visit to a nursing home to check on a
resident.
While passing by a patient’s room, they overhear a nurse speaking
harshly to an elderly man who has early-stage dementia.
The nurse is raising her
voice and repeatedly commanding the man to eat his meal. The elderly man
appears confused and begins to cry in distress. The doctor can clearly hear the
conversation from outside the room. What is the most appropriate action for the
doctor to take?
Options:
A) Speak to the nurse directly and address her behaviour.
B) Document the incident in the patient’s notes but take no further action.
C) Inform the General Medical Council (GMC) about the nurse’s behaviour.
D) Report the incident to the local authority safeguarding team.
E) Recommend to the nursing home manager that the nurse receive mediation
with the patient.
Answer → D) Report the incident to the local authority safeguarding team.
In this scenario, the behaviour of the nurse can be considered as emotional abuse
or neglect, especially because it involves a vulnerable elderly patient with
dementia.
Safeguarding procedures exist to protect individuals from harm, and a
referral to the local authority safeguarding team ensures that the situation is investigated formally. It allows for protective actions to be taken to ensure the
well-being of the patient and to prevent further distress.
E) Recommend to the nursing home manager that the nurse receive mediation
with the patient.
Mediation may not be suitable in cases of potential abuse. The situation needs a
safeguarding referral, not just a recommendation for conflict resolution.
Neglect or Abuse to a Patient by a Caregiver → Involve the Safeguarding Team.
Explanation of other options:
A) Speak to the nurse directly and address her behaviour.
While addressing the nurse may seem like an immediate response, it does not
address the seriousness of the situation. Emotional abuse should be dealt with
formally through safeguarding channels to ensure proper investigation and
accountability.
B) Document the incident in the patient’s notes but take no further action.
Recording the incident without taking further action would not adequately
address the potential risk to the patient. Documentation is important, but
safeguarding procedures must also be initiated.
C) Inform the General Medical Council (GMC) about the nurse’s behaviour.
The GMC regulates doctors, not nurses. Reporting this incident to the GMC would
not be appropriate since they are not the regulatory body for nurses.
Reporting Knife and Stab Wounds with Example Cases
Healthcare professionals in the UK are mandated by law to report any injuries
caused by sharp objects, such as stab or knife wounds, to the police, regardless of
the patient’s wishes.
This duty is in place to protect public safety and prevent
further harm. When reporting, only the fact that a knife injury has been treated
should be disclosed initially, with further patient details being shared only if:
• The patient consents to additional disclosure.
• There is a legal requirement, such as a court order.
• Public safety is at risk, and non-disclosure may lead to serious harm.
Confidentiality must be maintained unless a clear legal or public interest justifies
further disclosure.
Healthcare professionals are also encouraged to explain this
duty to the patient, so they understand the necessary steps and the limited
information being shared
- A 28-year-old man arrives with a stab wound inflicted by his partner. They
have no children, and he strongly insists on not involving the police.
In this case, the police must be notified due to the legal duty surrounding knife
wounds.
The healthcare provider can discuss concerns about domestic violence
and offer resources, while respecting confidentiality for further details unless
legally required to disclose them.
A 31-year-old woman with a stab wound has a young child at home. She does
not want the police involved.
In this scenario, the presence of a child may require involving social services or
safeguarding teams, as the child could be at risk in a violent household.
The
law mandates that the police and possibly social services or safeguarding
teams should be informed.
- A 24-year-old man presents with a self-inflicted stab wound but does not
wish for police involvement.
In cases of self-inflicted injuries, there is typically no obligation to inform the
police unless there are concerns about public safety.
The focus should be on
assessing the patient for psychological/ psychiatric support.
A 47-year-old woman is brought in with a stab wound from a random attack
in a public place.
Since this is a serious criminal act, it is mandatory to report the injury to the
police.
They will need to investigate the incident further, though personal
details should only be shared with the patient’s consent.
- A junior clinician treats a 35-year-old man with a stab wound to the abdomen
from a domestic argument. The patient insists it was a one-time incident and
does not want the police involved.
The healthcare professional must still inform the police of the knife wound.
The extent of further disclosure, such as the patient’s personal information,
should be escalated to senior staff or legal teams for a final decision.
This summary illustrates how healthcare professionals must navigate their duty to
report knife injuries while balancing patient confidentiality and legal
requirements.
A 27-year-old woman arrives at the Emergency Department with a cut on her
arm, which she explains occurred during a domestic altercation with her
partner
. She firmly states that this is the first time such an event has happened,
and she insists that it will not happen again. The patient is adamant that the
police should not be involved in the matter. Which of the following is the most
appropriate course of action?
Options:
A) Place the patient under temporary police protection.
B) Offer a referral for relationship counselling.
C) Inform the patient’s GP about the incident.
D) Respect the patient’s wishes and do not report the incident to the police.
E) Report the incident to the police
Answer:
Correct answer → E) Report the incident to the police.
• In cases where a patient presents with an injury inflicted by a sharp object,
such as a knife or any other weapon, it is mandatory for healthcare professionals
to inform the police, regardless of the patient’s wishes.
This is because the law
prioritises public safety and the possibility of future risk to the patient or others.
When reporting such incidents, healthcare professionals are expected to
disclose only the necessary information, specifically that a knife injury has
occurred.
More detailed personal information should remain confidential unless
further disclosure is legally required (eg, a court order), or in the public interest,
such as preventing serious harm to others.
68-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease is admitted to the hospital
with severe sepsis. Despite aggressive antibiotic therapy and supportive care,
her condition is rapidly deteriorating.
She is now unconscious and unable to
make informed decisions about her care. Her son, who is her next of kin, lives in
another state and cannot be reached immediately.
The medical team believes
that resuscitation would not be in her best interests due to her poor prognosis
and the advanced stage of her illness. She does not have an advance directive in
place. What is the most appropriate course of action?
Options
A. Resuscitate her if her condition worsens
B. Wait for her next of kin to be contacted
C. Initiate palliative care without completing a DNR order
D. Complete a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order
E. Wait for her condition to improve so she can regain capacity
Detailed Answer
The correct answer is D. Complete a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order.
Reasoning:
- Resuscitate her if her condition worsens: Resuscitating a patient with a poor
prognosis and advanced stage illness, like this patient, might not be in their best
interest. This could prolong suffering and delay an inevitable outcome without
improving quality of life. - Wait for her next of kin to be contacted: While involving the family in decision-
making is important, the immediate medical needs of the patient must be
addressed. Waiting for the next of kin could delay appropriate care and cause
unnecessary suffering. - Initiate palliative care without completing a DNR order: Palliative care focuses
on providing relief from symptoms and improving the quality of life. However,
without a DNR order, there is a risk that resuscitation attempts might still be
made, which could counteract the palliative approach.
- Complete a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order: Given the patient’s poor prognosis
and advanced stage of illness, along with the medical team’s belief that
resuscitation would not be in her best interest, completing a DNR order is the
most appropriate action.
This respects the patient’s dignity and aligns with ethical
principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.
- Wait for her condition to improve so she can regain capacity: The likelihood of
the patient regaining capacity in such a critical condition is low.
Delaying the
decision could lead to unnecessary interventions that might not align with the
patient’s best interests or her likely wishes.
In summary, completing a DNR order ensures that the patient receives care that
aligns with her condition and respects her dignity, preventing unnecessary and
potentially harmful interventions.
Remember that: a DNR decision is a clinical one. Ie, if the patient went
unconscious and has no advance directive (a living well), the clinical team can
decide whether to assign a DNR or no. It is a clinical decision.
44-year-old man with a background of bipolar disorder is brough to the
surgery for elective hernia repair. On the day of operation, he was found that
he is in a manic state (elevated mood, with rapid speech and a lack of insight
into his condition). He had previously given consent for the operation during
the period of stability.
However, his current manic state could prevent him
from understanding the implications and the potential complications of the
surgery. What is the most appropriate action?
→ Postpone the surgery until the patient regains mental capacity so he can
understand the implications of the surgery.
√ Consent is not constant -one-time- event.
√ The patient must be capable of understanding the surgery implications on the
day of the surgery.
You are a junior doctor (FY2). During your launch break in a nearby
restaurant, you saw your fellow FY2 doctor sitting with his friends and
discussing an argument that he had with his patient loudly.
He was disclosing
the patient’s medical background but not his identifiable details. What should
you do?
→ Inform him that he should not be discussing patients with his friends.
√ It may be considered a confidentiality breach to discuss patient’s details
outside of a professional setting (even without revealing patient identifiers).
√ If identifiable details were disclosed → Inform GMC.
An 80-year-old woman with dementia and decreased cognitive function and
mental capacity is brought to her GP by her 32-year-old daughter.
The
daughter wants the GP to provide her with a medical report or statement
that mentions that her mother has declined cognitive function and capacity.
She wants to use this report to gain control over her mother’s financial
wealth so that she can buy personal expenses such as buying a car and a
house for herself. What is the most appropriate action?
→ Inform safeguarding authorities.
The daughter wants to be given the power so that she can financially abuse her
mother’s money.
√ Since there is a potential abuse to a vulnerable adult, the appropriate
authorities should be included.
√ It is important for the GP to safeguard vulnerable adult.
√ Suggesting the daughter to seek legal advice for establishing a Power of
Attorney does not solve the immediate issue here (which is a potential abuse).
If a schizophrenic patient needs surgery, who is the responsible medical
personnel for assessing his mental capacity?
→ The surgeon.
Any healthcare professional can assess capacity. In this case, the primary
responsibility lies with the surgeon (as it is a case of surgery).
If there are concerns about the influence of the patient’s psychiatric condition
on their capacity, a psychiatrist expertise might be sought
For a junior doctor who feels that he needs educational guidance, who should
he approach first?
→ His supervising consultant.
A 78-year-old man is receiving a palliative care as he has end-stage lung
cancer. The patient is confused and desaturating and has a low systolic blood
pressure.
He is put on mechanical ventilation and being given the necessary
treatment. The medical team believe that he would not benefit from CPR
should he went into cardiac arrest, and CPR is not in his best interest. He has
no family and has no advance directive. What is the most appropriate action?
A) Fill a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form.
B) Wait for him to become less confused and discuss a (DNR) form.
C) Withdraw all treatment lines.
D) Seek advice from an independent advocate.
E) Seek court decision.
Answer → A.
• DNR “Do Not Resuscitate” is a decision of medical professionals not patients
or their families.
• However, the family members should know the meaning of a DNR and should
be told about the reasons of the DNR but their decision would not be
important.
• This might sound strange, but a decision of a DNR order can be made by the
doctors even if it is against the patient’s wish! The patient is not required to
consent on a DNR order!
Dnr
Remember, having said that, if any patient was alert and conscious and want
NOT to be resuscitated, the doctors should respect his wishes).
What if the patient has no family?
→ Fill a (DNR) form.
In short, if the medical professionals believe that a DNR is not in the patient’s
best interest, they would fill a DNR form after discussing (revealing, clarifying)
this decision to the patient’s family.
The patient’s and the family’s opinion
would not overrule the doctors’ decision. If he has no family, they would fill a
DNR form.
A 78-year-old man is receiving a palliative care as he has end-stage lung
cancer. The patient is confused and desaturating and has a low systolic blood
pressure. He is put on mechanical ventilation and being given the necessary
treatment.
The medical team believe that he would not benefit from CPR
should he went into cardiac arrest, and CPR is not in his best interest.
He has
no family and has no advance directive. What is the most appropriate action?
A) Fill a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form.
B) Wait for him to become less confused and discuss a (DNR) form.
C) Withdraw all treatment lines.
D) Seek advice from an independent advocate.
E) Seek court decision.
Answer → A.
• DNR “Do Not Resuscitate” is a decision of medical professionals not patients
or their families.
• However, the family members should know the meaning of a DNR and should
be told about the reasons of the DNR but their decision would not be
important.
• This might sound strange, but a decision of a DNR order can be made by the
doctors even if it is against the patient’s wish! The patient is not required to
consent on a DNR order!
Remember, having said that, if any patient was alert and conscious and want
NOT to be resuscitated, the doctors should respect his wishes).
What if the patient has no family?
→ Fill a (DNR) form.
In short, if the medical professionals believe that a DNR is not in the patient’s
best interest,
they would fill a DNR form after discussing (revealing, clarifying)
this decision to the patient’s family. The patient’s and the family’s opinion
would not overrule the doctors’ decision.
If he has no family, they would fill a
DNR form.
Important Ethical Principles
◙ The doctrine of double effect:
From its name (double) → If there are 2 options; one good and one bad. If you
do one, the other would be outweighed.
Ie, applying one good thing has -unintentionally- led to a bad outcome.
Example:
If you give the maximum dose of morphine to this elderly suffering patient who
is with end-stage cancer, you would relieve his uncontrollable pain and
suffering. However, this act may lead to death indeliberately (without an
intention).
In this example, relieving pain and suffering was the primary aim.
This is called: the doctrine of double effect (imp √).
So, it is used to justify good and bad -unintended- effects.
This is different from euthanasia; which means killing the patient deliberately
(eg, by giving a lethal dose of potassium or morphine). Euthanasia is not-
allowed (ILLEGAL) in the UK. Careful!
Beneficience
◙ Beneficence → Showing kindness and mercy.
Example: Holding a patient’s hand as he dies.
◙ Non-maleficence → (= Do No Harm)!
The rules include: do not kill, do not cause pain or suffering, do not
incapacitate, do not cause offence.
◙ Health maximization → Maximizing health with limited resources. In other
words, using the best treatment options that could result in the greatest
outcomes despite its economic values. (Health is first).