Evaluating Qualitative Research Flashcards
Why is methodological coherence essential in qualitative research?
Methodological coherence is essential to ensure alignment among research components, including philosophical assumptions, research questions, design, data generation, analysis, and interpretation.
What is the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ), and what are its three domains?
COREQ is a comprehensive protocol with 32 items. Its three domains include the research team, study design, and analysis/findings.
How does the relativistic approach differ from a one-size-fits-all evaluation of qualitative research?
The relativistic approach acknowledges the diversity of methods and data in qualitative research, highlighting the absence of universal criteria.
Why is ethics considered the bottom line for evaluating qualitative research?
Ethics is foundational because ongoing ethical processes are crucial for maintaining the strength of qualitative research.
What are the characterizing traits in qualitative research, and why are they considered dynamic?
Characterizing traits are fluid and dynamic criteria for evaluating qualitative research, varying across studies based on context and purpose.
How does the armchair walkthrough contribute to methodological coherence in qualitative research?
The armchair walkthrough is a reflective process helping researchers evaluate various aspects, from research questions to data generation, providing a roadmap for a well-conceived research plan.
What are the challenges in methodological coherence, specifically related to data collection and interpretation?
Challenges include misalignment when interview findings aren’t integrated with document analysis and inconsistency in interpreting data due to personal biases.
What does the COREQ checklist provide for the comprehensive evaluation of qualitative research?
COREQ provides a 32-item checklist covering three domains: research team, study design, and analysis/findings, adding transparency, consistency, and truth value to qualitative research reporting.
How does the relativistic approach contribute to discussions about quantitative vs. qualitative research?
The relativistic approach discusses relativism, acknowledging the diversity of methods and data in qualitative research, emphasizing the absence of universal criteria.
What considerations are important for kinesiology qualitative research, and how can researchers enhance the quality of their studies?
Researchers should embrace methodological coherence, utilize evaluation frameworks like COREQ, prioritize trustworthiness, consider contextual complexity, embrace rich descriptions, be reflexive, use purposeful sampling, maintain prolonged engagement, and critically review and reflect on research approaches for improvement.
