EVALUATION POINTS Flashcards
WHAT ARE 2 STRENGTHS OF THE BEHAVIORIST APPROACH?
(P)OINT
It is scientific.
Has successful applications
WHY IS THE BEHAVIOURIST APPROACH SCIENTIFIC?
(P)OINT
It uses objective methods to measure observable behaviours, adopting scientific methodology and quantitative methods.
WHY DOES THE BEHAVIOURIST APPROACH HAVE SUCCESSFUL APPLICATIONS?
(P)OINT
Classical and operant conditioning principles being used in therapy and education.
WHAT ARE 2 LIMITATIONS OF THE BEHAVIORIST APPROACH?
(P)OINT
only focuses on nurture
environmentally deterministic
WHY DOES THE BEHAVIOURIST APPROACH ONLY FOCUS ON NURTURE?
POINT
It views behaviour as being the result of our environment and upbringing.
WHY IS THE BEHAVIOURIST APPROACH ENVIRONMENTALLY DETERMINISTIC?
POINT
We passively respond to our environment and our behaviour is influenced and controlled almost exclusively by the associations we make and the rewards / punishments provided by our environment.
OTHER LIMITATIONS?
WEBSITES YOU CAN USE FOR + AND -
SIMPLY PSYCHOLOGY
TUTOR2U
ethical issues involved in the animal experiments N
over-simplifies the way we behave and only looks at how we react in the
environment N
overly deterministic N
STRENGTHS OF SLT
WEBSITE-GET REVISING
supporting research from Bandura’s Bobo Doll studies.
SLT principles have been applied to a range of real world behaviours (practical applications).
it can explain aggressive behaviour in the absence of direct reinforcement.
NEGATIVES OF SLT
WEBSITE-GET REVISING
contrived lab studies using young children who were exposed to aggressive acts against the Bobo Doll.
Ethical issues make it difficult to test SLT experimentally
study lacks validity because the children may have been aware of what was expected of them (demand characteristics)
(WOULDNT REALLY USE THIS ONE)It portrays humans as simple creatures, and the stimulus presented in this theory ignores the role of cognitive factors as well as biological factors.
STRENGTHS OF COGNITIVE APPROACH?
applications in the real world.
scientific, controlled methods.
Uses advanced technology
LIMITATIONS OF THE COGNITIVE APPROACH?
considered reductionist, as it does not provide a full explanation of human behaviour- claims our minds are like computers.
Theories are hard to test because mental processes are hidden from view, and not directly observable.
laboratory experiments- lowers ecological validity
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS EVALUATION +
Real world application (exposure therapy)
Behavioural explanation was used to help develop exposure therapies (SD). This shows value of the two-process model
Cognitive aspects of phobias
scientific - little albert
This explanation is useful for developing therapies
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH TO EXPLAINING PHOBIAS EVALUATION -
Phobias and traumatic experiences
The behavioural approach/two-process model of phobias can be criticised for being deterministic.- PSYCHOLOGY HUB
The behavioural approach/two-process model of phobias can be criticised for being reductionist
STRENGTHS OF SYSTEMATIC DESENSITISATION?
Strengths of SD
Effectiveness (Lisa Gilroy et al 2003)
People with learning difficulties
Less traumatic
FLOODING
2 +
1 -
Flooding
effective for simple (specific) phobias,
Cost-effective
Traumatic
BECKS NEGATIVE TRIAD EVALUATION (EXPLAINING DEPRESSION)
2 +
1 -
Research support (+)
Real-world application (+)
Only a partial application (-)
ELLIS ABC MODEL EVALUATION (EXPLAINING DEPRESSION)
1 +
2 -
Real-world application (+)
Only explains reactive depression and not endogenous depression (-)
Not all depression is caused by life events, it may not be clear what led the individual to be depressed at any one time.
Ethical issues (-)
COGNITIVE APPROACH TO TREATING DEPRESSION EVALUATION.
(+) Evidence for effectiveness in the form of research support
(-) Not suitable for all clients including those with severe learning difficulties
(-) If depression is so severe, they may lack motivation to engage with CBT at all = not effective
(-) High relapse rates
(+/-) Client preference – Not everyone wants to tackle their depression in this way. Some want their symptoms to be gone as quickly as possible!
INDEPENDENT GROUP +
There will be no order effects – ppts only complete one condition so they will not become bored or get better (practice effect). Increases the internal validity
Less chance of demand characteristics. Ppts take part in only one condition, they are less likely to work out the purpose of the study and change their behaviour to help or hinder. This increases the internal validity of the study
INDEPENDENT GROUP -
Requires more participants than as the researcher will need to get two separate groups of ppts to end up with the same amount of data
. Impossible to control all participant variables because only the key ones can be matched for – there could be others which could effect the research. This lowers the internal validity
REPEATED MEASURES +
Requires fewer participants as ppts take part in all conditions. Meaning a potentially larger sample can be used. Increasing external (population) validity
Participant variables are removed e.g. IQ/Age as ppts take part in all conditions. Increasing the internal validity.
REPEATED MEASURES -
Results may be affected by order effects – participants may become bored by the second condition and so do less well or better (practice effect). Lowers the internal validity.
Increased chance of demand characteristics as when ppts do the second condition they may work out the purpose of the study and change their behaviour to help or hinder. Lowers the internal validity.
MATCHED PAIRS +
Controls for individual differences/ participant variables i.e. ppts are matched on one or more key characteristics such as age, IQ, gender that may affect the results. Increasing the internal validity.
There will be no order effects – ppts only complete one condition so they will not become bored or get better (practice effect). Increases the internal validity.
MATCHED PAIRS -
The most time consuming experimental design as the researcher needs to identify all important participant variables and spend time matching participants
Individual differences/participant variables i.e. the different characteristics of the participants such as age, gender may affect the results. Lowers the internal validity.