Evaluation Points Flashcards
(20 cards)
types and explanations of conformity strengths
- research support for ISI (maths problem)
- research support for NSI (teens smoking)
- real world applications (energy conservation)
types and explanations of conformity limitations
- doesnt take into account individual differences affect NSI (nAffiliators)
variables affecting conformity strengths
confederates acted convincingly
variables affecting conformity limitations
- gender bias (all male ppts)
- ethical issues (psych harm)
- ecological validity (artificial task)
conformity to social roles strengths
- real world applications (Abu Ghraib)
- conducted ethically (approved by ethics committee)
conformity to social roles limitations
- not mindless conformity (depends on social norms)
- ethical issues (psych harm)
- demand characteristics may have occurred
obedience strengths
uniform effect obedience e.g Bickman
obedience limitations
- Lacks population validity (40 white USA males)
- ethical issues (deception +psych harm)
- lacks eco validity (at Yale w an artificial task)
PEELS: agentic state
❌ May not explain real life obedience
- lifton: Auschwitz doctors gradually changed form normal to killers over duration of war
- more permanent change than temporary which Milgram suggests
✅ Research support
- Blass and Schmidt: asked students to watch the original experiment and they blamed the experimenter for the harm caused to the learner
- shows we attribute responsibility to the authority not individual
PEELs: legitimacy of authority
✅ support form real-life research
- Tarnow: dependence of co-pilots on cap’s knowledge and expertise , with sometimes tragic consequences
- blindly follow orders from higher status (pilot)
❌ socially sensitive research
- e.g. Hitler used authority to inflict pain and death on minorities during the holocaust
- shows how legit authority can abuse their power, but some may use it as an excuse to evade personal responsibility for their actions
authoritarian personality strengths
- research support (virtual versions of milgrams experiment still produced the same results
- political attitudes are a determining influence (milgram’s study as game show, left wingers obeyed the least)
authoritarian personality limitations
- contradictory evidence (obedience dropped in run down office due to environmental/social factors not dispositional
- education may determine levels of obedience (less educated people more authoritative)
strengths of locus of control
✅ research support for resisting obedience
- holland: 37% internal didn’t go to 450v compared to 23% externals
counter peel: locus of control
✅ research support for resisting social influence
- Spector: ppts more likely to conform due to NSI if external so supports link
❌ only for ISI not NSI
- LOC not relevant for all instances of conformity and resistance
limitations of locus of control
❌ contradictory research
- Twenge et al: people have become more resistant to obedience but more external
- challenges link between internal LOC and resistance
strengths of minority influence
Research support for flexibility
- Nemeth and Brilmayer: confeds who compromised where more successful that those who didnt
Valuable when not changing majority
- makes majority make better decisions
limitations of minority influence
❌idea of deeper processing questioned
- mackie: process majority view more as belive we share the same beliefs
- dont spend time trying to understan why minorities views are less influential, only consider why a majorities view is diff
AO3 Obedience
research support for how effective obedience is in social change
- 65% obeyed even when they thought they were hurting someone
- don’t like to question authority, strongest influence, can implement social change on a wide scale through law
AO3 minority influence
research support
- Xie - snowball effect starts once tipping point of 10% is reached
- shows social change through MI isn’t easy and takes time
AO3 conformity
research support
- linkenbach and Perkins (teens smoking)
- change made through social intervention norms, follow suit to avoid standing out or being rejected