Evidence Law Flashcards

WB 2024 (65 cards)

1
Q

probative

A

tending to proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

exigencies

A

urgent demand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

corollary

A

natural consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

anathema

A

abhorrent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ouija board

A

a device ostensibly used for obtaining messages from the spirit world, usually employed by a medium during a séance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

probative value

A

“the extent to which the evidence could rationally affect the… probability of the existence of a fact in issue”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Distort

A

twist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hearsay

A

a witness’s testimony about a related-fact heard from another person outside of the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

adducing

A

citing as evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

racketeering

A

dishonest or fraudulent dealings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

impede

A

hinder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

vexed

A

problematic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

quackery

A

dishonest practices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ascertainment

A

the process of finding out for certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

judicial discretion

A

judge’s choice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

rigid

A

inflexible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

contentious

A

controversial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

paramountcy principle

A

(family law) - the best interest of children is the paramount consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

quasi

A

seemingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

readily

A

willingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

supplemented

A

enhanced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

adduced

A

cite as evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

voir dire

A

a preliminary hearing conducted to decide issues of law and fact to be assumed for the purpose of the trial proper

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

menacingly

A

threateningly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
consoled
comfort
26
render
provide
27
induced
get to
28
bulging
bloated
29
ajar
slightly open
30
dissuaded
discourage
31
tiff
friendly argument
32
row
a serious dispute
33
rebuked
scold
34
vent
let go and feel free
35
crockery
dishes
36
volatile
unpredictable
37
spherical
round shape
38
smugly
in way that shows extensive pride or happiness
39
substantiate
give proof of
40
41
nonplussed
confused
42
flustered
agitated
43
privy
aware of
44
jest
a thing just said or done
45
fanciful
imaginative (amazing)
46
actus reus
guilty act
47
mens rea
guilty mind
48
exhaustive
complete
49
non-exhaustive
not the whole pic
50
alibi
claim to have been somewhere else at the time of the crime
51
committal hearing?
pre-trial hearing to weigh out the evidence
52
putative
supposed
53
prima facie case
on first appearance, contains sufficient evidence to prove the elements of the offence.
54
subpoena
a writ ordering a person to attend court and give evidence
55
impeaching
challenging
56
probative
having the quality to prove
57
imputation
accusation
58
corroborate
confirm or give support to
59
serenely
peacefully
60
61
Is Leading question allowed during examination in-chief?
s37 No unless granted leave by court
62
In what circumstance a party may be able to ask leading question examination in chief?
s37 (1) a) court leave b) introductory to witness’s evidence c) no objection made, and the other party have a representative d) question relates to matter not in dispute e) expert witness asked hypothetical question
63
Accused not compelled sec?
s17
64
Who is competent to give evidence?
s12 a) every person is competent to give evidence and b) a person who is competent to give it evidence is compellable to give evidence.
65
s81 EA?
Hearsay Exception to Admission, or previous representation that was made in relation to admission and necessary to refer to in order to understand the admission.