Exam 1 Flashcards
A Very broad overview Everything that I may need to know for Prinston's exam 1!!!!
1
Q
Copies of the original autographs
A
Manuscripts
2
Q
Word for word
A
Dynamically equivalent
3
Q
“A measuring Rod” the collection of the inspired books of the Bible
A
Canon
4
Q
The original copies of Biblical text
A
Autographs
5
Q
Textus Receptus, (literal) Critical text, Dynamic Equivalance
A
Translations
6
Q
Alexandrian, Cecerarean, Western, Byzantine
A
Textual families
7
Q
Alexandrian, Caesarean
A
Critical Text
8
Q
Byzantine
A
Majority Text
9
Q
Orthodoxy, Liberalism, Neo- orthodoxy
A
Three views of inspiration
10
Q
The Bible is fully the word of God
A
Orthodoxy
11
Q
The Bible is only partly inspired
A
Liberalism
12
Q
The Bible is God’s word differently to each person
A
Neo- Orthodoxy
13
Q
Septuagint (LXX), Latin Vulgate, Syriac (Pershitta)
A
Translation Witnessess
14
Q
The Basis of the OT Canon
A
Homologumena (to speak the same)
15
Q
Fathers of the School of Alexandria
A
Clement & Origen
16
Q
Fathers of the Period of Church councels
A
Augustine & Jerome
17
Q
Father of the Middle Ages
A
Thomas Aquinas
18
Q
Fathers of the Reformation
A
Calvin & Luther
19
Q
Church father who created the four fold sense
A
Thomas Aquinas
20
Q
Father of the Literal-historical approach
A
Martin Luther
21
Q
Father of the grammatical-historical approach
A
John Calvin
22
Q
Age of Literal, Typological interpretation
A
Apostolic period
23
Q
A set of principles that help determine an author’s intentions
A
Hermeneutics
24
Q
End of 2nd-3rd Cent. Traditional, Allegorical
A
The Patristic Period
25
End of 2nd-3rd Cent, Allegorical, Platonisim
School of Alexandria
26
4th Century, grammatical-historical, Aristolelian
School of Antioch
27
5th Century, Eclectic, multifaceted Balanced approach
The Period of the Church Fathers
28
The four-fold sense, fundamental use of the literal sense of scripture
Middle Ages
29
Desiderius Eramus, Literal-historical, Grammatical-historical
Reformation Era
30
Age of Historical- Critical Method
Modern Era
31
Literal-historical, what you see in the text is what it is
Realism
32
Realism
Aristotle
33
Spiritual, mythical, allegorical, what you see in the text is symbolic of something deeper or fuller
Idealism
34
Idealism
Plato
35
Specifies what some words or terms "refer to"
Referential
36
What the text says, Literal meaning, scientific definition of a term
Denotative
37
What the text means, a words emotional overtones
Connotative
38
Meaning derived from the context
Contextual
39
The hermaneutical challenge of separation
Distance
40
The world has changed since Biblical times, The text was written at different times
Time Distance
41
Different priorities and values than of those found in Biblical times
Culture Distance
42
Seeks to determine what the text says
Exegesis
43
The lack of understanding of surroundings of events or location
Geography Distance
44
Different languages used in the text most of which are inaccessible to the majority of people today
Language distance
45
To discern God's message, To avoid or dispel misconceptions or erroneous perspectives and conclusions about what the Bible teaches, To be able to apply the Bible's message to our lives
Importance of hermaneutics
46
Compares various manuscripts and textual traditions in order to re-produce the original
Function of textual criticism
47
The approach of this era was to interpret all of Scripture in light of one single Key theological idea
Alexandrian
48
Literal, Tropological, allegorical, anagogical
Four-fold sense
49
facts (sense)
Literal sense
50
Moral duties (sense)
Tropological
51
Faith of the Church (sense)
Allegorical
52
Hope of the church (sense)
Anogogical
53
Preserves various apocryphal books that were influential throughout the first 1500 years of church history
Catholic Canon
54
The NT authors alluded to the text as canonical
The protestant canonical defense
55
Rarely questioned except, Heb, James, 2 Pet, 2 & 3 John, and Jude
Canonicity of the NT
56
Tedious painstaking comparisons of ancient manuscripts to get a closer understanding of the text
Job of textual Critics
57
Formally equivalent, Dynamically equivalent, Paraphrase
Types of translations
58
Thought for thought
Formally equivalent
59
1. Person of faith 2. Willing to submit to the authority of Scripture 3. Allowing the HS to guide the study of Scripture 4. Recognizing the church 5. Knowledgeable of the text
Qualifications of interpretation
60
The conscious or subconscious presuppositions that form the basis of our philosophy of Biblical interpretaion
Preunderstanding
61
Informational, Attitudinal, Ideological Methodlogical
Four Categories of preunderstanding
62
Informational
Knowledge (category)
63
Attitudinal
Bias (category)
64
Ideological
Views of reality (category)
65
Methodological
Explanation (category)
66
Pre-understanding should be removed/discarded or modified/changed if found inaccurate
Erroneous Pre-understanding
67
Authorial intent, Textual meaning, perceived meaning
Three aspects of meaning
68
Authorial intent
The meaning intended by the author
69
Textual meaning
The meaning derived from grammatical differences
70
Perceived meaning
The meaning the reader determines
71
the thought (or pattern of ideas) that words provoke in someones mind as intended by the author of these words
Meaning
72
A personal reaction to meaning
Significance
73
Although a text may have several different significance it only has one singular meaning.
Single meaning
74
Seeing a dual meaning in the text
Polysemy
75
The HS may encode a hidden meaning not known or devised at all by the human author
Sensus plenior
76
# (reverse)
Hermeneutics
A set of principles that help determine an author's intentions
77
# (reverse)
Exegesis
Seeks to determine what the text says
78
# (reverse)
Function of textual criticism
Compares various manuscripts and textual traditions in order to re-produce the original
79
# (reverse)
Manuscripts
Copies of the original autographs
80
# (reverse)
Autographs
The original copies of Biblical text
81
# (reverse)
Translations
Textus Receptus, (literal) Critical text, Dynamic Equivalance
82
# (reverse)
Textual families
Alexandrian, Cecerarean, Western, Byzantine
83
# (reverse)
Critical Text
Alexandrian, Caesarean
84
# (reverse)
Majority Text
Byzantine
85
# (reverse)
Three views of inspiration
Orthodoxy, Liberalism, Neo- orthodoxy
86
# (reverse)
Orthodoxy
The Bible is fully the word of God
87
# (reverse)
Liberalism
The Bible is only partly inspired
88
# (reverse)
Neo- Orthodoxy
The Bible is God's word differently to each person
89
# (reverse)
Translation Witnessess
Septuagint (LXX), Latin Vulgate, Syriac (Pershitta)
90
# (reverse)
Homologumena (to speak the same)
The Basis of the OT Canon
91
# (reverse)
Clement & Origen
Fathers of the School of Alexandria
92
# (reverse)
Augustine & Jerome
Fathers of the Period of Church councels
93
# (reverse)
Thomas Aquinas
Father of the Middle Ages
94
# (reverse)
Calvin & Luther
Fathers of the Reformation
95
# (reverse)
Thomas Aquinas
Church father who created the four fold sense
96
# (reverse)
Martin Luther
Father of the Literal-historical approach
97
# (reverse)
John Calvin
Father of the grammatical-historical approach
98
# (reverse)
Apostolic period
Age of Literal, Typological interpretation
99
# (reverse)
The Patristic Period
End of 2nd-3rd Cent. Traditional, Allegorical
100
# (reverse)
School of Alexandria
End of 2nd-3rd Cent, Allegorical, Platonisim
101
# (reverse)
School of Antioch
4th Century, grammatical-historical, Aristolelian
102
# (reverse)
The Period of the Church Fathers
5th Century, Eclectic, multifaceted Balanced approach
103
# (reverse)
Middle Ages
The four-fold sense, fundamental use of the literal sense of scripture
104
# (reverse)
Reformation Era
Desiderius Eramus, Literal-historical, Grammatical-historical
105
# (reverse)
Modern Era
Age of Historical- Critical Method
106
# (reverse)
Realism
Literal-historical, what you see in the text is what it is
107
# (reverse)
Aristotle
Realism
108
# (reverse)
Idealism
Spiritual, mythical, allegorical, what you see in the text is symbolic of something deeper or fuller
109
# (reverse)
Plato
Idealism
110
# (reverse)
Referential
Specifies what some words or terms "refer to"
111
# (reverse)
Denotative
What the text says, Literal meaning, scientific definition of a term
112
# (reverse)
Connotative
What the text means, a words emotional overtones
113
# (reverse)
Contextual
Meaning derived from the context
114
# (reverse)
Distance
The hermaneutical challenge of separation
115
# (reverse)
Time Distance
The world has changed since Biblical times, The text was written at different times
116
# (reverse)
Culture Distance
Different priorities and values than of those found in Biblical times
117
# (reverse)
Geography Distance
The lack of understanding of surroundings of events or location
118
# (reverse)
Language distance
Different languages used in the text most of which are inaccessible to the majority of people today
119
# (reverse)
Importance of hermaneutics
To discern God's message, To avoid or dispel misconceptions or erroneous perspectives and conclusions about what the Bible teaches, To be able to apply the Bible's message to our lives
120
# (reverse)
Alexandrian
The approach of this era was to interpret all of Scripture in light of one single Key theological idea
121
# (reverse)
Four-fold sense
Literal, Tropological, allegorical, anagogical
122
# (reverse)
Literal sense
facts (sense)
123
# (reverse)
Tropological
Moral duties (sense)
124
# (reverse)
Allegorical
Faith of the Church (sense)
125
# (reverse)
Anogogical
Hope of the church (sense)
126
# (reverse)
Canon
"A measuring Rod" the collection of the inspired books of the Bible
127
# (reverse)
Catholic Canon
Preserves various apocryphal books that were influential throughout the first 1500 years of church history
128
# (reverse)
The protestant canonical defense
The NT authors alluded to the text as canonical
129
# (reverse)
Canonicity of the NT
Rarely questioned except, Heb, James, 2 Pet, 2 & 3 John, and Jude
130
# (reverse)
Job of textual Critics
Tedious painstaking comparisons of ancient manuscripts to get a closer understanding of the text
131
# (reverse)
Types of translations
Formally equivalent, Dynamically equivalent, Paraphrase
132
# (reverse)
Formally equivalent
Thought for thought
133
# (reverse)
Dynamically equivalent
Word for word
134
# (reverse)
Qualifications of interpretation
1. Person of faith 2. Willing to submit to the authority of Scripture 3. Allowing the HS to guide the study of Scripture 4. Recognizing the church 5. Knowledgeable of the text
135
# (reverse)
Preunderstanding
The conscious or subconscious presuppositions that form the basis of our philosophy of Biblical interpretaion
136
# (reverse)
Four Categories of preunderstanding
Informational, Attitudinal, Ideological Methodlogical
137
# (reverse)
Knowledge (category)
Informational
138
# (reverse)
Bias (category)
Attitudinal
139
# (reverse)
Views of reality (category)
Ideological
140
# (reverse)
Explanation (category)
Methodological
141
# (reverse)
Erroneous Pre-understanding
Pre-understanding should be removed/discarded or modified/changed if found inaccurate
142
# (reverse)
Three aspects of meaning
Authorial intent, Textual meaning, perceived meaning
143
# (reverse)
The meaning intended by the author
Authorial intent
144
# (reverse)
The meaning derived from grammatical differences
Textual meaning
145
# (reverse)
The meaning the reader determines
Perceived meaning
146
# (reverse)
Meaning
the thought (or pattern of ideas) that words provoke in someones mind as intended by the author of these words
147
# (reverse)
Significance
A personal reaction to meaning
148
# (reverse)
Single meaning
Although a text may have several different significance it only has one singular meaning.
149
# (reverse)
Polysemy
Seeing a dual meaning in the text
150
# (reverse)
Sensus plenior
The HS may encode a hidden meaning not known or devised at all by the human author
