Exam 1 Study Guide Flashcards
historicism vs presentism
historicism is the study of the past for its own sake
presentism is interpreting and evaluating historical events in terms of contemporary knowledge and standards
zeitgeist approach
the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time
the great-person approach to historiography
empathizes the works of individuals such as Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Darwin, or Freud.
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1841-1981) embraced the great-person approach to history, saying that history “resolves itself very easily into the biography of a few stout and earnest persons.”
historical development approach
showing how various individuals or events contributed to changes in an idea or connect through the years
for example, one could focus on how the idea of mental illness has changed throughout history
historiography
the study of the proper way to record history.
there are often no final answers to the questions this topic raises
what is the problem with viewing psychology as a science that started in the late 19th century in Germany?
1) it ignores the vast philosophical heritage that molded psychology into the tump of science that it eventually became
2) it omits important aspects of psychology that arose outside the realm of science
what is science? what are two major components of science?
science is the systematic attempt to rationally categorize or explain empirical observation. Popper described it as a way to rigorously test solutions to problems, while Kuhn emphasized the importance of paradigms that guide the research activities of science.
empirical observation
theory
rationalism
the theory that reason rather than experience is the foundation of certainty in knowledge.
empiricism
maintains that the source of knowledge is always based on sensory observation
what are the two main functions of scientific theory?
it organizes empirical observations
it acts as a guide for future observations
scientific law
a constantly observed relationship between two or more classes of empirical events. for example, when x occurs, y also tends to occur. by stressing the lawfulness, science is proclaiming an interest in the general case rather than the particular case.
correlational laws
describe how classes of events vary together in some systematic way
for example, exercise tends to correlate positively with health. with such information, only prediction is possible. that is, if we know a person’s level of exercise, we could predict his or her health, and vice versa
causal laws
specify how events are causally related
for example, if we knew the causes of a disease, we could predict and control that disease - as preventing the causes of a disease from occurring prevents the disease from occurring
determinism
the assumption that what is being studied can be understood in terms of causal laws
the determinist assumes that everything that occurs is a function of a finite number of causes that, if these causes were known, an event could be predicted with complete accuracy
however, knowing all causes of an event is not necessary; the determinist simply assumes that they exist and that as more causes are known, predictions become more accurate
what, according to Popper, drives scientific progress?
a theory’s incorrect predictions, not its correct ones
in real scientific life theories typically contribute not by being right but by being wrong. in other words, scientific advance in theory as well as experiments tends to be built upon the successive corrections of many errors, both small and large. thus the popular notion that theory must be right to be useful is incorrect
paradigm
the entire collection of beliefs, values, techniques, and so on shared by the members of a given scientific community
can have multiple theories under a paradigm (they were more general)
the paradigm can act like blinders
what do paradigms guide?
all of the researcher’s activities, both theoretical and methodological
preparadigmatic stage
a time in which a number of competing viewpoints exist
during this period, a discipline is characterized by a number of rival camps or schools, a situation contrary to unification and that results in, essentially, random fact gathering. such circumstances continue to exist until one school succeeds in defeating its competitors and becomes a paradigm
the normal science generated by a paradigm continues until the paradigm is displaced by a new one, which int turn will generate its own normal science
paradigmatic stage
puzzle solving activity called normal science occurs
psychology is a multi-paradigmatic science
revolutionary stage
a paradigm is replaced by another paradigm
what is the difference between the Popperian view and the Kuhnian view?
Kuhn’s assessment of science stresses subjective and sociological factors, whereas Popper’s assessment stresses logic and creativity
Popper believed that there are truths about the physical world that science can approximate. In other words, Popper accepted the correspondence theory of truth. Kuhn, on the other hand, rejected this theory, saying instead that the paradigm accepted by a group of scientists creates the “reality” they explore
what characterizes a scientific discipline?
1) determinism (everything occurs for known or knowable reasons
2) empiricism vs rationalism (experience and observation vs. thought and logic)
3) the search for scientific laws (correlational laws that allow us to predict events or causal laws that allow us to predict and control events)
4) relies on public observation (publicly verifiable knowledge, replication, replication)
according to popper, what is the best status of a theory?
not yet disconfirmed
risky predictions
According to Popper, predictions that run a real risk of being incorrect. Theories that do not make risky predictions or that explain phenomena after they have already occurred are, according to Popper, not scientific.