Exam 2 lecture 11 Flashcards
(35 cards)
genetic info can help:
- develop gene therapy
- predict disease risk
- guide therapy
- guide drug development
stake holders involved
patients, healthcare providers, industry, insurers, government, society
patient perspective
using it to guide therapy was more widely accepted that predict disease risk
provider perspective
using to guide therapy was more widely accepted
pharmaceutical industry perspective
mixed incentives
positives for pharmaceutical industries
new drug targets
drugs with better side effects
more efficient drug developments
salvage drugs
negatives for pharmaceutical industry
decreased market share
fewer blockbuster drugs
orphan popilations
diagnostic industry perspective
positive incentive: increased market share
insurer perspective
- predicting disease not widely accepted
- guide therapy more accepted (HER2)
government perspective
safety and efficacy
medicare/medicaid reimbursement
regulations
society perspective
maximize benefits for all stakeholders
minimize risks and costs
cost
genetic testing
subsequent intervention
genetic counseling
benefits
improved therapeutic response
avoid adverse effects
avoid unnecessary treatments
improved quality of life
clinical validity
how consistently and accurately the test detects or predicts the outcomes of interest
how true something is
clinical utility
how likely the test is to significantly improve patient outcomes
dose limiting toxicity for TMPT polymorphism
myelosuppression (neutropenia)
as prevalence goes up
cost effectiveness goes up
genotyping prevalence has to be
at least 1% to be cost effective
homozygous TMPT
cost effectiveness
<$50.000 per QALY
if frequency is 0.5% or less, the cost of the genetic test becomes important & cost effectiveness is retained if
the cost of the genetic test is <$100
warfarin
oral anticoagulant for treatment/prevention of thromboembolism
dosing algorithm of warfarin
-start at 5 or 10 mg
- check INR day 3
- adjust dose
- check INR day 5
- adjust dose
etc
current warfarin challenges
- narrow therapeutic range (INR)
- patients are in therapeutic range only about 66% of the time
- up to 20-fold variability in dose requirements
INR too low
ineffective anticoagulation->thromboembolism