exam 3 Flashcards
(139 cards)
what was Thorndike known for and what were the predictions of what he would see
discrete operant trials for cats: hungry cats in puzzle boxes, hit latch, open door, get milk and measure the time to get the milk out
predictions on paper
what are the three things going on in Thorndike’s experiment
1) stimulus (seeing the latch)
2) response (pressing the lever)
3) reward (the milk)
what was Thorndike’s idea in the cat experiments
S -> R theory (reward is catalyst for reflex, the arrow)
reward “stamps in” the habit
why did S -> R become so popular
S -> R makes S the cause and the cause comes before R (this makes sense in terms of other sciences, cause -> effect relationship)
S -> R needs no mental states or expectations of the future
what are there three possible associations (memory contents) and in terms of the cat
- habit/reflex
1) S -> R: see latch -> hit it - expectations of future
2) S -> reward: see latch -> milk available
3) R -> reward: hit latch -> milk
what are the two experiments that show some early evidence for expectations
1) changing reward value qualitatively
2) changing reward value quantitatively
what is the changing reward value qualitatively experiment
Tinklepaugh chimp study
- gave monkeys a cup of food that they had to pull up a shade for
- he did a swap experiment where he swapped banana for lettuce (chimps like banana better)
- monkeys get pissed when there is no banana and they look everywhere for it and shriek
this shows that there is an expectation
what is the changing reward value quantitatively experiment
straight runway in rats
GP1 1 pellet | run -> 16 pellets
GP2 16 pellets | run -> 16 pellets
GP3 64 pellets | run-> 16 pellets
S -> R says that the running speeds should eventually be the same because getting the same reward
show actual results on graph
this is called the “elation” and “depression” effect
draw the early evidence experiment for R -> reward and explain
on paper
this is also a type of devaluation experiment (taking away the value of something)
- if S -> R then t2 is irrelevant, they will continue to do both, but the rats will adjust the amount of BP & CP
- this is evidence for the R -> reward association because theres no way the rat would know to tailor the amount of BP and CP without association between R -> reward
- still a little evidence for S -> R because they will BP and CP a little even because of nausea because they do have residual responding for something the rat doesn’t want
draw the early evidence experiment for S -> reward and explain
on paper
- shows they formed the L -> sucrose association and the T -> pellets association (S -> reward)
- still a little evidence for S-> R because they’re not BP or CP exclusively
so, what is the evidence for S -> R
1) you still BP a little for food you hate
2) the learning curve is gradual not abrupt
what is an example in humans of habit/reflex (S->R) and expectation of future (R->reward and S->reward)
habit/reflex (S->R)
- automatic processing
- driving somewhere without awareness to familiar place
- makes you fast, efficient and not interfered with by conscious thought
expectation of future (R-> reward, S-> reward)
- controlled processing
- turning around and driving bak when you hear of snow coming
- makes you flexible and adaptable (conscious)
what is an example of the habit/reflex and expectations in cigarette smoking in humans
habit/reflex
-pull a cig and smoke, there exist times when theres a cig in your mouth and you have no awareness of how it got there
expectation of future
-out of cigs, switch abruptly to conscious thinking “where do i go to get one?” “what do i do?”
what is the difference between procedural memory and declarative memory
procedural: action sequences
declarative: descriptions of the action
what kind of memory is sports training
- trying to promote procedural memory
- when coaches give you instructions and you try to implement them, it activates declarative memory (doesn’t work)
- only way to get better at sports is to practice them
why does therapy for fear of public speaking tend to not work
S -> R, see people -> PANIC
- when you go and talk to a counselor, they give you strategies to practice
- this is all conscious and declarative
- so you still panic next time you go to public speak, doesn’t get rid of S -> R reflex
explain “Those who can’t do teach”
- great players sometimes make terrible coaches because they act on procedural memory, don’t know how they’re doing it they just do it
- teachers and good coaches act on declarative memory, and can explain how they do it
explain L -> BP -> food
1) S -> R: see bar -> hit
2) R -> reward: press bar -> get food
3) S -> reward: see bar -> food available
* *there is a fourth thing the rat stores**
L: BP -> food
no L: BP -> no food
an event is associated with an association between two other things (an association within an association)
called: hierarchical association
what is a hierarchical association
a stimulus is associated with an association between two things
what is a hierarchical association in real life
McDonalds: flip burger -> $
kitchen: flip burger -> no $
McDonalds is associated with the flip burger get money association
explain why the other three associations cannot explain:
L: BP->pel, CP-> suc | pel-> nausea | L: BP < CP
T: BP->suc, CP-> pel | pel-> nausea | T: BP > CP
1) S->R: if it was this, they would be BP and CP the same because its just a habit
2) R-> reward: thinks BP and CP = both rewards so BP and CP are done the same because both responses are equally associated with both rewards
3) S -> reward: thinks L & T = both rewards so would BP and CP the same because both stimuli are equally associated with both rewards
what is right:
“L -> (BP -> pel)” and “L -> (CP -> suc)”
“T -> (BP -> suc)” and “T -> (CP -> pel)”
the stimulus tells you what response leads to what reward S -> (R -> reward)
so what can one learning event do
potentially creates 4 different memory contents in different locations
this is more complicated, memory can be stored in dozens of different places
what is evidence that memory is all over the brain in different locations
associative visual agnosia (lack of knowledge) in stroke victims
what is the associative visual agnosia study (do they get these questions right or wrong)
1) copy this picture (anchor) YES
2) ask “whats an anchor?” YES
response: big hunk of metal, makes ship stay still
3) please say “anchor” YES
response: “anchor”
4) here’s a picture (anchor) what is it? NO
5) please draw an anchor NO
1) says theres no problem with visual processing; so this cannot explain 4
2) says theres no problem with language or knowledge; but this does not explain 5
3) says theres no pronunciation issue; but this does not explain 4
1) says there’s not a problem with motor performance, but this does not explain 5
- *they are missing the association between vision and language/knowledge**
- *all of the individual elements are intact, the only thing thats broken is the association between them**
- *neuroscience is such a mess because knowledge is so broken up in the brain**