Exam #3 Flashcards

(62 cards)

1
Q

Social Influence

A

things we do to try to change people’s behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Normative Influence

A

produces public compliance, going along with the crowd to be liked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Informational influence

A

products private acceptance, going along with crowd because you believe crowd knows more than you or you doubt own belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Auto-Kinetic Effect

A

People stand in dark room, look at light, it will start to look like its moving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Methods to change people’s behavior or mind

A

once people commit, they feel compelled to behave consistently with initial comment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Foot-in-the-Door Technique

A

start with small request follow with larger request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Low-ball technique

A

Get person to agree to a low-cost request, then throw in some extra costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bait-and-Switch Technique

A

Make attractive offer to draw them in, oops its not available, offer another option (not as good), people will accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Labelling Technique

A

give them a label, then give them a request using that label, they will buy it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reciprocation

A

We did something for you, now do something for us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Door-in-the-Face technique

A

start with an inflated request, retreat to a smaller one that appears to be a concession, not as bad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

That-Not-All technique

A

Begin with inflated offer, immediately add to the deal by offering a bonus or discount

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scarcity technique

A

rare opportunities seem more valuable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pique technique

A

capture attention with an unusual request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Disrupt then Reframe

A

Distract attention with unexpected/confusing info, then reframe message in clear, positive light

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How to resist Persuasion:

A

Know someone is trying to persuade you, negative attitude change can do a boomerang effect; leads to do opposite of what they want you to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Maximizing Resources

A

needed to resist persuasion, don’t be tired or intoxicated, was first commitment a trick? don’t feel obligated to be consistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Defenses against influence

A

Reciprocity: was gift similar to what I received?; Scarcity: Is it really rare? Something I need?;
Capturing and Disrupting attention: stop and think before action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Persuasion

A

Attempt to change a person’s attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

3 components of Persuasion

A

Who- source of message
What- actual message
To whom- audience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Halo effect

A

If someone has one positive quality, then they may have other positive effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Repetition

A

If neutral state, repeated exposure= persuasive message

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Receptivity

A

attending to and understanding the message, less intelligent people less likely to be receptive, moderate intelligence easiest to persuade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Need for Cognition

A

Some people like to think and be informed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Elaboration likelihood model and Heuristic/Systematic model
proposes automatic and conscious processing are involved in persuasion
26
Central (Systematic Route)
persuasion based on the strength of argument; slower, more deliberate process; longer lasting attitude/behavior
27
Peripheral (Heuristic) Route
Persuasion based on minor cues & heuristics; faster, more automatic process; temporary & superficial attitude/behavior change, determined by if they care enough to think
28
Attitude Inoculation
Exposure to weak arguments that allows for generation of counter arguments; allows better resistance to subsequent arguments
29
Prosocial behavior
doing something good for someone
30
Factors in Prosocial Behavior
Effective rule of law; reciprocal helping; norms that promote fairness
31
Two types of unfairness
Under-benefitted, both animals and humans don't like this; Over-benefitted, only humans don't like this
32
Moral reasoning
decisions based principals of right and wrong
33
Moral intuition
what feels right and wrong
34
Forgiveness
Stop feeling angry and stop seeking retribution from who has wronged you
35
Egoistic helping
expect something in return
36
altruistic helping
expect nothing in return
37
Psychological helping
self-satisfaction
38
Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis
Perceiving others in need, taking perspective of others, empathetic concern, altruistic helping
39
Belief in a Just World
Life is fair and people, generally get what they deserve: victim blaming
40
Bystander effect
People less likely to help when they are in the presence of others
41
Aggression
Behavior intended to harm someone who doesn't want to be harmed
42
Antisocial behavior
Not directed at a specific person; damages interpersonal relationships, culturally undesirable; aggression may be social or antisocial
43
Types of Aggression
Direct vs. Indirect: victim is present vs. absent Displaced: taking t out on someone else Reactive: hot, impulsive, angry Proactive: cold, premeditated Passive: withholding behavior to cause harm
44
Instinct Theories of Aggression
Darwin: Aggression evolved to help animals survive, strongest pass on genes Freud: Human motivation is based on instinct; thanatos-death instinct
45
Frustration-aggression hypothesis
Aggression behavior is always due to frustration; frustration always leads to some form of aggression, theory is overstated
46
Hostile Attribution bias
Ambiguous action by other is perceived as aggressive
47
Hostile perception bias
Perceive any social interaction as being aggressive; not necessarily involving you
48
Hostile expectation bias
assume other people will react to potential conflicts with aggression
49
Weapons effect
presence of weapon can increase aggression; priming
50
Injunctive norm
Specify what most approve or disapprove of- is effective to reduce anti-social behavior
51
Descriptive norm
Specify how most people behave - is not as effective to reduce anti-social behavior
52
Two ingredients to belongingness
regular social contact with others; close, stable, mutually intimate contact
53
High self-monitors
choose friends to maximize similarity
54
Low self-monitors
change self to create closer bonds
55
Matching Hypothesis
people form and maintain relationships with similar physical attractiveness
56
Ingratiation
Things people actively do to try to make others like them
57
Propinquity
We become close to people we are physically close to
58
Socially allergy effect
mildly irritating habits seem worse over time
59
Reactance
Threatened freedoms are more desirable
60
Loneliness
Discrepancy between ideal and perceived social relationships
61
Bad apple effect
one person who breaks the rules may inspire others to do the same
62
Effects of rejection
Depression, eating disorders, suicidal thoughts, interferes with psychological and cognitive, reduced self-control, increased anti-social behavior