exam 3 (chapters 5 & 6) Flashcards
(72 cards)
conformational vs configurational isomers
conformational: the different positions that a molecule can twist into
configurational: R/S, matter of left or right handed
depends on whether or not the compounds can be interconverted by the rotation about single bonds
enantiomers vs diastereomers
both are non-superimposable
enantiomers: mirror images, “twins”
- can only have 1 other enantiomers (come in pairs)
- all chiral centers have opposite configurations
diastereomers: not mirror images, “cousins”
- can be many of them
- opposite configruration at some chiral centers but not all
how to determine if a molecule is identical or not
identical means that its superimposable
- superimposable = no chiral centers
- if the molecule has at least 1 chiral center, then it can be non-superimposable
- superimposable molecules are achiral
- b/c then its mirror image will also be the exact same
stereocenters
single atom that is bonded to 4 different groups not specifically just 4 different atoms
identifying chiral centers (stereocenters) in ring structures
ring with a group = stereocenter
- if ring doesn’t have a group attached on it somewhere, it’s not a stereocenter because either direction you travel around the ring, it’s the same
- if carbon in ring has substituents that make each “route” unique as you go clockwise and counterclockwise, it can be a chiral center
- or if the ring has symmetry in going around the ring both ways then it’s also not a chiral center
how to determine the configuration of a stereocenter
- each group around the carbon is given priority based on atomic number of the element directly attached
- hydrogen always gets lowest priority
- if 2 same elements: list the atoms of the atom attached to stereocenter (basically looking for next point of difference)
- priority group going (decreasing) clockwise = R
- priority group order going counter clockwise = S
BUT MAKE SURE H IS THE ONE ON THE DASH OTHERWISE NEED TO FLIP IT AND SWITCH THE CONFIGURATION
rotation of plane-polarized light in enantiomers + diastereomers
configuration does not have to do with direction of polarized light!!
- enantiomers rotate plane-polarized light in opposite directions so if one is rotating clockwise (+) then the other will rotate counter clockwise (-)
- if a sample has equal amounts of both enantiomers (racemic mixture), the rotations cancel each other out, and the mixture is optically inactive
- diastereomers are not predictable, they can either both rotate + or both - or opposite
nonmenclature for R and S for multiple chiral centers
(3R, 4S) -
goes in the beginning for multiple (specify location of stereocenter), otherwise just the configuration in the beginning
properties of enantiomers
the same physidcal (melting and boiling points) and chemical properties
- only difference is the rotation of plane polarized light
difference in configuration between enantiomers
ALL chiral centers have different configurations
ex. (3R, 4S) and (3S, 4R)
properties of diastereomers
have different physical properties (like melting points or solubility) and different chemical behaviors
difference in configuration between diastereomers
have different configurations at some but not all stereocenters
racemic mixture
enantiomers are mixed together in equal concentrations
- 1 R and 1 S enantiomer
- because of this, each rotates light in the opposite direction so overall rotation cancels out = racemic mixtures do not rotate plane-polarized light
how to tell if a molecule is chiral
has chiral centers and no internal symmetry
- if it has symmetry its a meso compound
aryls
aromatic rings
(ally’s are the ones that look like an A)
E/Z naming system
- look at the groups on both sides of the double bond
- between the groups on each side, label the higher priority group
- if the higher priority groups are both on the same side, its Z and opposite sides is E
E = trans, Z = cis
and put this E/Z in the beginning of the name and -ene at the end (for the double bond)
- cis/trans can only be used when the 2 groups are the same across the double bond, but this is not the case with E/Z naming
2 ways to draw enantiomers
simpler way: invert ALL stereo centers (convert dashes to wedges and wedges to dashes)
- this puts the mirror behind the compound
- if all of them are not inverted, then they’re not enantiomers - they’re diastereomers
other way: create a mirror image but placing a mirror and flipping the molecule
- this puts the mirror on the side of the compound
- first method doesn’t work all the time, esp when the dashes and wedges are implied and not drawn
E/Z isomers are what type of stereoisomers
diastereomers because they are stereoisomers that are not mirror images of each other
optically inactive molecules
do not rotate plane- polarized light
- no chiral centers or plane of symmetry present
- meso compounds and racemic mixtures
meso compound
HAS chiral centers but overall chiral because of an internal plane of symmetry
- makes them optically inactive
- also be careful about rotating a carbon because if you can rotate a carbon and gain symmetry, then it is also meso
- that one lonely guy that is a mirror image of itself (b/c drawing the mirror image will just give you itself)
- if it didn’t even have chiral centers, then it will be superimposable and just itself
- also every R is inverted to S and every S is inverted to R but have plane of symmetry
constitutional isomers
same molecular formula but different connectivity
how to calculate the maximum number of optically active stereoisomers (enantiomers + diastereomers) that a single compound can have
max number of optically active isomers = 2^n
where n = # of chiral centers
but meso compounds are considered inactive b/c their plane of symmetry throws them off, even though they have many chiral centers
if enantiomers then arranged as multiple pairs of enantiomers so 2^2 = 4 arranged as 2 pairs of enantiomers
cis vs trans compounds dipole moments + IMFs
cis: dipole moment so stronger IMFs (higher boiling point), but lower melting points (b/c cant form crystals and squash together)
trans: no dipole moment so weaker IMFs but higher melting points (can form crystals bc can squash together)
what region will the nucleophile tend to attack?
the most positive one