Exam 4 Flashcards

(90 cards)

1
Q

Embodied cognition

A

Meaning is not an abstract list of semantic features, but is embodied within perceptual motor systems- affords a way of grounding semantics into concrete visual, motor, auditory systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ginsberg and Kaschak

A

Participants make sensibility judgements by pulling a handle towards them or pushing the handle away from them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Results of Ginsberg and Kaschak

A

Participants were faster pulling the handle toward them (regardless of sensibility results) if the sentence read was “Nancy gives YOU a book” vs “you give Nancy a book “

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Speer et. Al (2009)

A

neuroimaging study of individuals during comprehension of a story activated similar areas in the perceptual motor areas of brain that were activated by aspects of the text- motor activity in the text would activate motor areas in the brain etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Speer results

A

Supports model in which simulation ins critical for comprehension
read about riding a bicycle- motor areas consistent with riding a bicycle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Martin 2005- lesion data

A

suggesting motor area lesions produce more difficulty with tool use, whereas visual regions produce more difficulty identifying living things (what do you do with a brush/ scissors)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Results of Martin 2005

A

Tools we interact with physically- concepts are tied to motor systems themselves
items we imagine visually- tied to visual system so hard to bring up after damage to those areas
those with difficulty with language-lesion area determined certain deficits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Smallworld Network Perspectives (Steyvers and Tenenbaum)

A

relatively small number of pathways connecting any two nodes (6 across all people in US)
relatively small number of notes that are highly connected to other nodes (follows a power law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Preferential attachment

A

as we build a network overtime, some nodes get laid down earlier than other- new nodes are preferentially attached to the older nodes (instead of making their own single node)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Milestone concepts

A

Across development, new networks of nodes originating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Latent Semantic Analysis (Landauer and Dumais)

A

Poverty of the Stimulus: how could children so much about word meaning so quickly without explicitlylbeing taught about the concepts? Develop grammar/ vocabulary at a remarkable rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Unstructured environment and language development

A

Arguenment for innate structure for language acquisition, and specialized learning devices (semantic primitive features) Analyzed a giant amount of text- each paragraph is a separate entity- then you have words in each paragraphs- do these words appear in other similar paragraphs?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Results of latent semantic analysis

A

indicated that this provides a very useful way of capturing meaning
nothing like a semantic feature in the model…
contexts in which stimuli appear can be remarkably revealing… (Obama and words like good/ bad for media bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Visual Imagery

A

Problem of a “mind’s eye” and interpreting it

Large individual differences- some better and worse than others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dual Code Theory (Pavio)

A

Possibly two types of visual representation

  • propositional/ verbal
  • imagery based grounded in perceptual/ motor systems (related to embodied cognition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evidence for Dual code theory

A

Concreteness effect in memory
Present concrete words with both imagery and verbal code (you’ve seen dog as well as seen the word dog, tangible)
Abstract word supposedly only have verbal code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Size and reaction time in Pavio Study predictions

A

Words should NOT be influenced by size congruency of picture (because words have to be translated into images, size of words shouldn’t mattter. Pictures SHOULD be influenced by congruency (since pictures are already in the image format) and words should be SLOWER than pictures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Results of Pavio RT study

A

Reaction time for words was not determined by size congruency, but pictures did, though pictures were always slower than words (same as predictions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Shepherd and Metzler mental rotation

A

Took just as long to mentally rotate the shape to check if it fit against the model as it would have to physically rotate the shape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Cooper and Shepard (1973)

A

Letter rotation- at the long interval, participants can sufficiently rotate the stimulus as if it was already rotated
(Allows one to measure mental rotation time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Kosslyn, Ball and Reiser

A

Participants looked at picture and asked to generate a mental image, then asked to mentally walk from image to image in their head. time walking from place to place proportionate to distance in cm between items in the image

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Other findings from Kosslyn’s mental image study

A

Limitations on Image “Space”
Image focusing experiments, focus in on the nose
of a bunny, when it is next to an elephant or next to a bumblebee.
– Mental Walking, mentally walk towards a one story or two story house

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Results from SHepard and Kosslyn/ conclusions

A

Image processing follows the same constraints that engage directly engage perceptual/motor
systems
– E.g., it is as if you are physically rotating the stimulus or mentally walking etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Roland and Friberg

A

Used neuroimaging to measure blood flow as
participants were mentally walking, doing arithmetic, thinking of a melody etc…<
– Found that there was overlap in neural areas for
real vs imagined processing – Consistent with the embodied cognition
mentioned earlier, e.g., the Speer et al. stud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Lesion Studies (Levine et al.
Patient A (ventral what pathway lesion) had problems with object identification in both perception and memory. • Could indicate where objects were in their house or shops in the neighborhood, but couldn't recognize or draw objects from memory. Patient B (dorsal, where pathway lesion) had spatial location problems in both perception and memory • Could recognize or draw objects from memory but couldn't indicate where they were located
26
Summary of Neuroscience Visual Imagery Studies
Evidence of an overlap between areas involved in perception and imagery from neuroimaging studies. • Evidence for similar dissociations in lesion patients for perception and imagery processing. • Overall, suggests considerable overlap between perception and imagery processing
27
Limitations of Images
Although visual imagery can engage similar brain regions, it is not identical to perception – i.e., we can tell the difference between imagined vs perceived objects
28
Carbon and Leder
Berlin Wall and estimating city distances Estimated distances were greater for cities on opposite sides of wall. – Varied as a function of age and political disposition
29
Veridical Memory of common Stimuli
Do you know what is on a common penny, which was very common when the study was conducted? Possibly, we "overestimate" our visual memory
30
Johnson and Raye
How good are we at distinguishing between imagined vs real events in memory? Participants were presented an object or a name of the object 2, 5, or 8 times – Participants were told to image the object when presented the name – TEST: How many times did you SEE THE OBJECT
31
Results of Johnson and Raye
Participants were influenced by the number of times an item was imagined, hence, there is difficulty with reality monitoring in memory. • This difficulty is greater for individuals with good imagery ability.
32
Ways we distinguish between real and imagined information
Johnson and Raye argue that we use; Sensory information (early visual cortex-V1) Contextual information available in perception Knowledge of generation processes
33
Role of Selective attention in a problem in reality monitoring
In dreaming one does not control activity, so the generation processes are not available – Could be related to hallucination, i.e., one lacks control of "what" is doing the imaging. Note in schizophrenia there is a breakdown in selective attention, could be a contributor – Sack et al. found that Schizophrenics rated their imagery (e.g., smell of leather) as stronger than controls
34
Hyman and Penland (1996(
Planting Memories via imagery sessions (potentially related to psychotherapy) Imagining vs Thinking about a false event • ̰"When you were 5 you spilled punch on the parents of the bride" • This was a false event was presented amongst true childhood events provided by parents
35
Results of Hyman and Pentland Study
Probability of falsely remembering the event after three sessions, often providing additional information - Imagined 38% - Think about 12% conclusion: relatively easy to "plant" a Memory by imagining the event
36
Eidetic Imagery
Iconic form of mental imagery Remarkably detailed, remember Erickson & Collin's dot patterns – Initial exciting evidence from a single subject in a study by Stromeyer & Psotka (later deemed a fraud)
37
Haber and Haber Study
Examined 150 elementary school children | -presented pictures for 30 seconds, and participants were asked to generated an image of the pictures
38
Conclusions about Eidetic Imagery
There has not been a well-documented case of eidetic imagery (truly photographic) in adults • It is possible that children may go through a stage that appears eidetic, but more work is needed, could be file drawer problem. • Likely, individuals who report eidetic abilities have good imagery abilities, but probably not eidetic.
39
Three major areas of language
Comprehension (most studied area) Production (more difficult to study) Acquisition (nature vs nurture)
40
Linguistic universals
1) Arbitrariness 2) Discreteness 3) Openness 4) Duality of Patterning
41
Universal: arbitrariness
Little relationship between word meaning and sound of the word (except onomonopia; buzz, boom, clap etc.)
42
universal- discreteness
There are discrete boundaries, and other variances are not processed (44 phonemes in the english language, with sharp boundaries, limited set of phonemes across all languages)
43
Universal: openness (recursion)
Unlimited number of possible sentences- critical for language creativity and models of language acquisition [John believes [Mary thinks[ Joe is handsome]]]
44
Duality of patterning- universal
All languages have both meaning level and surface level representations Two surfaces levels and one meaning; "John threw the ball (the ball was thrown by john) One surface level and two meanings; "they are eating hens."
45
Explicit knowledge in Language
What you can verbally explain/ say you know | Explicit knowledge with awareness is only the tip of the iceberg regarding computations in language
46
Chomsky's competence performance distinction
Competence; Set of rules that all users of the language have available- enormous difference across individuals in how they produce/ understand language Performance; how those set of rules are implemented within language behavior, individual differences in many cognitive processes (vocal track characteristics, vocab etc)q
47
How competence is studied within a language
Goal is to identify the set of rules which 1) describe the relations amongst the constituents (descriptive adequacy)--> how words can be combined to make a noun phrase, how syllables can be combined to make words etc. 2) productive adequacy--> is able to produce new/ novel utterances and linguistic events
48
Phonological
Words are made of syllables and syllables have structures (words = series of syllables (onset--rhyme[nucleus and coda]) onset and codas are optional
49
Phonological rules
a) BG and PT cannot occur at the beginning of a word (stops) - both have the same voicing... b) two voiced stops or two voiceless stops cannot occur at the beginning of a word (more powerful rule) c) two stops cannons occur at the beginning of a word - even more powerful rule--> rule in English d) BONUS: if a single voiceless stop occurs at the beginning of a word, then it is "aspirated"
50
Morphology
words are not simply strings of phonemes and syllables, but carry meaning. Morphemes are the minimal unit threat conveys meaning (words often contain multiple morphemes (gender not marked in english on top of words- girl running and boy running use the same word)
51
Bound morphemes
unites that cannot stand along, but added to stems to add meaning- /s/ /ed/ /ing/ /ly/ etc
52
Free morphemes
Words of the language that can stand alone in [gentle] [man]ly= gentle and man
53
Two types of morphological rules;
Inflectional morphology and derivational morphology
54
Inflectional Morphology
modify words to fit into a sentence to add meaning to the sentences (plurals, past tensiveness; quacks, quacked, quacking)
55
Derivational morphology
``` change meaning (able, ate, iffy, ize- huggable, learnable, *compound words* toothbrush, armpit etc. ) ```
56
Skinner vs Chomsky
Nature vs Nurture Skinner (behaviorist) argued language acquisition follows universal laws of learning (control and reinforcement--> NURTURE) Chomsky (argued that Language is unique and follows its own laws of learning, nature)
57
Skinner's position on language;
Stimulus constraints-->Response-->Consequences
58
Criticism of Behaviorist model of Language Acquisition
1) Language acquisition is not gradual (as would be predicted by reinforcement) makes abrupt jumps gaining RULES of language -Auxiliary verb use (He not little he big vs he is not little he is big) 2) progression of irregular verb/noun forms in the language Children early on can use some irregular forms correctly (go-went, run-ran, mouse-mice, sit-sat), Later on may make more mistakes in this irregular words as they apply common rules to these irregular -->verb forms/ tenses/ nouns (go-goed, went-wented, mouse-mouses) 3) Gling, glinged, glings as if they have rule- applied appropriately
59
Principles Beyond Reinforcement
1) Modeling; learning through observation- not overt response driven 2) "Parentees": titration child directed speech to level of child's competence- to be able to maximize the communication (baby talk to the child- are babbling WITH the baby)
60
Species Specific Learning Devices
Imprinting with water fowl, Marler's sparrow song acquisition for bird song, Nottebohm;s work with finch (critical period for language)
61
Lenneberg and language acquisition
critical period for language acquisition in humans -tied to lateralization 1) prognosis for recovery from brain injury for Language decreases as one ages 2) Second Language Acquisition enormous benefits to exposing child to second/ third language early on 3) Down's Syndrome language acquisition appeared to stop during teenage years (controversial
62
Ambiguity REsolution
Ambiguity can occur at both the lexical level and the syntactic level.
63
Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution and Minimal Attachment (Frazier)
Attach each new phrase to the most recent phrase. • Critical in minimizing demands on limited capacity memory, can’t maintain multiple interpretations across time
64
Garden Path Study (MacKay Study)
Compared to unambiguous utterances: Took longer to complete • Stutter, dysfluencies, etc. • Participants were not aware of the ambiguities appears that individuals are computing multiple interpretations even though they may be unaware of these computatio
65
Mixed Model of Ambiguity Resolution Four stages (MacKay)
Compute all interpretations of ambiguous utterance. • Based on available evidence attempt to select an interpretation. • If insufficient information is available, must select by clause boundary. • If wrong selection is selected, then attempt to recover surface structure to reinterpret.
66
Critical nature of Clause Boundaries (Bever, Garrett, Hurtig
• Although flying planes can.... • Although some planes can... • Although flying planes can be dangerous, he... • Although some planes can be dangerous, he... Results indicated that the first sentence was slowest, confirming the importance of clause boundaries
67
Swinney's Cross-Modal Priming Study
Were expecting a different words after the pause due to the context of the sentence
68
Balota and Duchek
Alzhiemer's vs Control in Mean Response Latencies to the Third word (Surgeon, Organ, piano) can Surgeon, ceiling, piano If one maintains both interpretations of ambiguous utterances, this would produce a significant breakdown in comprehension processes, i.e., multiple interpretations in working memory. • Selection of an interpretation is critical for comprehension.
69
General Framwork of Language Production
Formulate some intention, not terribly well specified, my turn to say something, stored sequences of production, social context, etc... • Provide some specific linguistic structure, selecting syntactic frames, words, phonemes, etc... • Send commands to the articulatory system, voicing, place of articulation, etc...
70
Serial Vs Parallel
Although speech seems serial in nature, it is massively parallel across many levels. • Thinking does not stop during articulation, but articulation lags behind intention and specifying linguistic structure.
71
Naturally Occurring Errors in speech production
``` Anticipation Errors (reading list --> leading list) Perseveration Errors (pass out --> pass pout) Referrals or Spoonerisms (Duke and Duchess--> Duck and Dooches) ```
72
Anticipation Errors
Take my bike-->Bake my bike • Phoneme is anticipated from second word to first
73
Perseveration Errors
Pulled a tantrum-->Pulled a pantrum • Phoneme is preserved from first word to second
74
Reversal/ Spoonerisms Error
The Duke and Duchess of WindsorThe Duck and Dooches of Windsor • Reverse phonemes across words
75
Voiced Feature Reversal Error
Clear blue skyglear plue sky
76
Place of Articulation Reversal Error
Pedestrian --> tebestrian | bilabial voiceless /p/ and voiced alveolar /d/ becomes voiceless alveolar /t/ and voiced bilabial /b/.
77
General Principles of speech errors
Errors very rarely violate phonetic rules of language They are not random Errors typically occur across the same position, most frequently the first position • E.g., well made-->mell wade, but NOT wem-lade Errors typically occur across the same stressed position, most often stressed syllables. • E.g., He saw the boy-->He baw the soy, but NOT He saw ba thoy
78
Conclusions about language from common errors
words are not produced as whole units, but in production are a series of syllables, phonemes, and features • Position within a word and stress must be coded early • These units are consistent with the models of speech perception we discussed words are not produced as whole units, but in production are a series of syllables, phonemes, and features • Position within a word and stress must be coded early • These units are consistent with the models of speech perception we discussed
79
Higher order errors
Misderivations Word substitution Errors Malapropism
80
Malapropism
Word selected has similar sound as target • Lets have a few laughs to break up the monogamy, instead of monotony.
81
Word Substitution Errors
• Look at that lady with a Dachsund-->look at that lady with a Volkswagen Evidence for activation of semantically related units
82
Misderivations
Intervening node-->intervenient node Evidence for the importance of morphological level of analysis
83
Brown and McNeil
navigational instrument used in measuring angular distances, especially the altitude of sun, moon, and stars at sea • If in TOT state, participants are asked • How many syllables does it have? (57%) • What letter does it start with? (62%) • What word does it sound like? (secant, sexton.
84
Brown and McNeil Study indicates
We have partial information about a correct word, indicating activation of some nodes, but insufficient activation of the lexical node. This partial information is related to the components we discussed producing errors. • Particularly frustrating, probably due to attention being driven to an automatic process, akin to a Broca’s aphasia.
85
Tversky and Kahneman
Biases from cognitive mechanisms influence judgment and decision making. • Often we use heuristics in perception, memory, and decision making, i.e., short-cuts that typically, but not always, work. • Heuristics minimize demands on more attention demanding/effortful cognitive system
86
Heuristics in Devision making
Availability (possibly the most powerful), estimating probabilities by the ease to which information becomes available (strength)
87
Hayes Theorem and Statistical Devision Making
Must take into account prior probabilities, much more powerful estimates, basically conditional probabilities. • People rarely do this Critical to take into consideration base rate differences, i.e., conditional probabilities. Has become the standard in statistical decision making. • Converting this to a tree network and frequencies simplifies the problem for participants
88
Dijksterhuis
Maybe sleeping on it does work for some decisions. • Participants read about 4 different cars. One car had 75% positive attributes, 2 cars had 50% positive attributes, and another car had 25% positive attributes. Importantly, participants received either 12 attributes total or only 4 attributes total. • After reading about the cars, participants either thought about the cars for 4 minutes or solved anagram problems
89
Result of dijksterhuis
For decision making, in some cases, one can be mislead by attending to too much information, since attention is limited. • Possibly, more automatic processes (heuristics) can kick in and estimate simple weight
90
Bottom line in decision making
Critical to consider cognitive systems in making decisions | Limitations of attention, biases to use heuristics, and availability are all critical in making decisions