Exam 4 Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

1) What are the objections to Shankara’s view (all is one without parts)?

A
  1. Where does the illusion reside?
    - Can not be in my mind or Brahman
  2. How can Brahman be hidden, given nature and pore consciousness
  3. How can the world be neither a thing (being) nor a thought (product if being)
  4. How can the world be neither real (eternal) or unreal (non-existent) nor both
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the objections to Ramanujan’s view (all is one with parts)?

A
  1. All the parts (of the one) are the same
    - obj: all finite parts don’t equal infinite
  2. All the parts are the same
    - obj: if each part is infinite then we wouldn’t need more parts
  3. Some parts are infinite and some finite
    - obj: if that’s the case than this is creator and creation not spiritual monism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the argument that the material world exists? And what are the reasons for the minor premise?

A

Argument: Something external to myself appearsto exist

Minor premise:

T​he cause of what I see isnot non­material/ mind (it is not mymind, and not anothermind).

  1. Sub argument 1:
    a. If the cause of what I see ismymind, then I would have total (all)control overwhat I see next.
    b. I do not have total control over what I see next.
    c. Therefore the cause of what I see isnot mymind.
      Sub argument 2:

a. If the cause of what I see isanother mind, then I would have no control overwhat I see next
b. It isnot the case that I have no control (i.e. I do have some control)overwhat I see next.
c. Therefore, the cause of what I see isnot another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two forms of dualism, and what are the objections to each?

A
  1. Ordinary Duelism: mater is eternal and independent of spirit
    - Obj: matter is not self-sustaining so it can’t be eternal
  2. Dependent Duelism: matter is eternally dependent on spirit
    - Obj: this would be creator & creation not duelism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the cumulative revised argument for God?

A

a. Something iseternal
b. Whatiseternal iseithermatterorspirit
c. Whatiseternal isnot matter
d. Whatiseternal isnot the individual self/spirit, which istemporal
e. Therefore,what iseternal issome otherspirit, which we call God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of ‘God’ in Theism?

A

A spirit, infinite, eternal, unchangeable in being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, and truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are Hume’s five solutions and five responses to the problem of evil?

A
  1. Gods goodness is perfect but incomprehensible
    - then all religion ends
  2. To know why there is evil, I must know all
    - hope not proof
  3. More good than evil
    - cannot measure amount
  4. God is very powerful but not infinitely so
    - he can create and isn’t infinitely powerful is a contradiction
  5. No natural evil is needed
    - how can you know pleasure without pain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the Freewill Solution to the problem of evil, and what are the objections?

A

Free Will Solution:

  1. Natural evil isdue to moral evil (assumesthat natural evil isnot
    original in Theism).
  2. Moral evil isdue to free will.
  3. Free will isnecessaryforhuman dignity.

Response to Free Will Solution:

  1. Free will makesmoral evil possible, not actual.
  2. If moral evil becomesactual, that doesnot make it necessary.
  3. Moral evil doesnot have to be possible; one can be free without
    the possibilityof moral evil.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the definition of ‘good’ and ‘evil’ in the Ironic Solution?

A

Good:

Evil: failure to use reason to the fullest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three main concepts in Ethics? Define each and provide examples of the second concept.

A
  1. Meta Ethics: exploresthe preconditionsfornormative and applied ethics
  2. Normative Ethics: includestheoriesthat pursue answersto the question: “What
    oughtItodo?”
    - ex: Existentialism:​The good isachieved byan act of the will determining the good
    independent of anyessential human nature
  3. Applied Ethics: assumesrationallyjustified meta­ethical principlesand a
    normativeethical theory, which maybe applied to practical ethical problemsin a
    clear,critical and comprehensive manner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BONUS: Why is there moral evil and why is there natural evil in the Ironic Solution?

A

????

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BONUS: What is the Ironic Solution?

A
  1. Because all evil in the world, I can’t see how it can be so
  2. Because of all unbelief in the world
  3. Because of all the unbelief in me
  4. Because I shut my eyes I can’t see God is all powerful
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly