Exam 4: chap 15-18 Flashcards
(78 cards)
Opening: Identify the meaning of the term counter-factual history.
Counter-factual history is a form of history that attempts to answer the “What if?” questions that arise from counterfactual conditions (what would have been true under different circumstances). For instance: the Wallace presidency is a compelling/disturbing counterfactual scenario because the policies he advocated adhered to the Soviets in 1948, though by 1952 he viewed the USSR as evil.- what would have happened if he became president.
- Explain why relations were so contentious between labor and management in the immediate aftermath of World War II.
People were arguing whether labor gains made during the Depression (ex: minimum wage and the right to collective bargaining) were temporary or permanent.
- Management wanted the 1935 Wagner Act repealed now that the Depression was over, especially the all-important collective bargaining law
- Labor wanted to hang on to their gains
- Identify the key legislation that affected labor.
The GOP’s Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 outlawed communism among labor leaders, union political contribution, closed shops (right-to-work zones replaced workplaces mandating union membership), and secondary strikes (or boycotts) whereby major unions like steel and auto would strike in unison-> takes huge toll on the economy
- Restricted the activities and power of labor unions
- Identify the Dixiecrats (States’ Rights Party) and integrate their story with our earlier analysis of the Democrats in the 1920s and ’30s.
The States’ Rights Party, aka the Dixiecrats, led by Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, threatened to break away from the Democrats or even lead a secessionist movement if the Democrats pushed for civil rights. In the 1920s and ‘30s the Democrats had been divided along rural/urban, immigrants/WASP, wet/dry lines. FDR was able to bridge that gap during the Great Depression by agreeing not to push for civil rights as a party unifier. During the Dixiecrat period, some Southern Democrats opposed continuation of the New Deal ( others supported liberal economic policies) while opposing racial equality or integration. Northern Democrats wanted progress on both fronts. Truman was progressive on civil rights to overcome the Dixiecrats. The Democrats were still divided on race.
- Evaluate the successes, failures, and challenges of Harry Truman’s Fair Deal. Identify the Old Guard, and explain their importance.
Truman expanded the New Deal with the Fair Deal platform. He wanted to add civil rights to the Democrat’s platform. It supported civil rights legislation, universal health insurance, expansion of Social Security benefits, and repeal of the Taft-Hartley Act that weakened labor the year before. A group of conservative northern Republicans and southern Democrats called the “Old Guard” mostly hindered the progress of the Fair Deal. The Old Guard blocked civil rights legislation supporting black voting rights and prohibiting lynching up until the mid-1960s. Truman got legislation passed forcing the federal government to contract a small portion of its work with minority contractors in 1951. The portions of the Fair Deal that made it through Congress were small increases in the minimum wage and expansion of social security benefits to include COLAs (1950) and disability insurance. Taft-Hartley wasn’t repealed, but neither did unions lose the basic right to collective bargaining that they’d won in the 1930s. The Fair Deal didn’t add much ground to New Deal liberalism but, by taking the offensive, Truman helped secure the gains won in the 1930s (during the Great Depression). Sometimes in politics, failing on offense is better than or similar to playing defense- in failing to pass the Fair Deal, in other words, Truman cemented the New Deal (Social Security, minimum wage, and housing loans locked in).
- Describe how China’s communist revolution influenced American politics and Harry Truman.
Truman was blamed by TIME’s Henry Luce for “losing China’’ and being soft on communism. However, the same people trashing Truman on the right end of the spectrum (Lube & retired Herbert Hoover) were accusing him of having committed war crimes in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan in 1945-> their overseas concern was just to harm Truman’s reputation domestically. Either way, the public sided with General Douglas MacArthur in his fight with Truman over whether America should have invaded China during the Korean War.
Any man who wasn’t “tough on communism” ran the danger of being considered a fellow communist. The State Department even fired East Asian experts as an irrational reaction to China’s revolution. Rather than standing up to his criticism, Truman fed fire by instituting loyalty oaths and reviving the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), a panel started in the House of Representatives in the late 1930s to ferret out right-wing influence (Nazi and Klan) in the gov. The new enemy within was on the left and seemingly no one was above being accused of communism. The CIA and FBI were finding out what they could about real Soviet spies, but in hopes to defuse his critics, Truman fanned the flames (of the HUAC) when he should have just made sure these groups were adequately staffed to hunt real spies.
- Describe Joseph McCarthy’s role in American politics
Joseph McCarthy (R-WI) chaired similar committees as the HUAC in the Senate. After 1950, he manipulated the spirit HUAC had whipped up from 1947-50. In February 1950, McCarthy made his initial splash by holding up a sheet of paper with purported names of communist infiltrators at a Republican Women’s Club fundraiser in Wheeling, West Virginia. He sought attention because he was virtually unknown outside his state and realized he could destroy pretty much anyone’s career simply by accusing him of being communist, all while raising his own profile. If the victim fought back, that merely proved his guilt. McCarthy went so far as to encourage government employees to sift through one another’s files and spy on each other. Anyone who challenged him was “red” and some Democrats flocked to him out of fear (Kennedys). With their leftist leanings, former New Dealers were subject to attack. Now Republicans and conservative Democrats smeared liberals with communism through red-baiting.
- evaluate recent attempts to revive Joseph McCarthy’s reputation.
Recently, some commentators have tried to revive McCarthy’s reputation because it became apparent after the Cold War ended in 1991 that the Soviets indeed had spies throughout the U.S. government and were influential in the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). Both the Americans and Soviets, in fact, infiltrated each other’s governments, nuclear research, militaries, and intelligence agencies. For this reason, the Texas State Board of Education pushed to clear McCarthy’s legacy of blame in the states’ public schools in the early 21st century. But McCarthy wasn’t involved in counter-espionage (spy) intelligence such as the Venona Project, leaving him with little more knowledge about Soviet spies than the average man on the street. There’s not enough overlap between real Soviet spies and those McCarthy accused of communist infiltration to rehabilitate his reputation, and he attacked too many non-spies simply for leaning left. Moreover, if McCarthy did have inside knowledge of Venona and revealed names, he would’ve treasonously exposed key secrets, accidentally blowing the operation’s cover. If anything, his unsubstantiated claims gave cover to real spies who could claim that they were being unfairly targeted like other McCarthy victims. The Catholic senator also targeted a disproportionate number of Jews and homosexuals.
- We should recognize him for what he was: mainly a cynical opportunist gasbag who lacked any sense of decency and justice. His legacy was manipulating and exposing the paranoid tendencies of an anxious society.
- Analyze how broader American culture mirrored the government’s attempts to ferret out communists.
Paranoia within the government spread to the rest of society and popular culture in the Red Scare- 2nd in America’s history after an earlier post-WWI outbreak.
- The Cincinnati Reds baseball team changed their name to the Redlegs just to counter any suspicions as to their political leanings.
- Hollywood conservatives (John Wayne, Walt Disney) tried to push leftist actors, writers, and directors out of the industry (blacklisting)
- Writers and directors considered themselves as centrists defending America from a menacing threat of surrounding “isms”- although everyone who cares believes in some sort of “ism”
- The KKK sued Warner Brothers for defamation because of their negative portrayal in Black Legion (1937), and in the anti–Klan Storm Warning (1951) at the height of the Red Scare.-> the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover started going after the KKK as well as leftists
- About ¼ of Americans read Hearst newspapers that backed McCarthy
- Anyone open to civil rights progress for Blacks was considered a communist
- Analyze and assess the theory that Hollywood radicals were trying to dismantle the American system.
The MPA (Motion Picture Alliance) shifted from anti-Nazi to the idea that left-leaning actors, writers, and directors wanted to attain power through subversion, revolt, or dismantling the voting system. Their “blacklist” never had any formal legal authority, but it damaged careers and included people who weren’t communists or didn’t pose any active threat to American democracy. By taking the slippery slope argument too far, the MPA was instead merely silencing the voices of those they disagreed with. While not technically a violation of free speech rights — only the government itself could be guilty of that — it hypocritically violated the spirit of free speech they wanted to defend against communism. Really, few actors or directors had any intention of abolishing voting or dismantling the system. Free speech was a legally relevant issue once the MPA began testifying before Congress in 1947. HUAC interrogations of Hollywood leftists were among the most notorious violations of the First Amendment in American history. However the simple fact of being leftist or communist even, isn’t illegal in the US. Soviet infiltration was a large threat in the Cold war, but the Soviets never infiltrated Hollywood.
- Evaluate the idea that public/government spending can only be a drag on the economy. How well does that notion stand up against American history during the Cold War?
Public/government spending allowed for significant progress to be made in aeronautics and space exploration during the Cold War. Founded Nasa and got into a space race with the USSR. NASA funneled billions in public money to aerospace companies like Chrysler Aviation, who built von Braun’s Redstone Rockets- key link between NASA’s rockets and long-range ballistic missiles. NASA’s spin-off technologies have led advances in many other important industries such as health, medicine, firefighting, etc.
It’s a commonly held notion today that only free markets spur growth and innovation while governments just drag down the economy. Military spending during the Cold War was an example of how government-funded research and cooperation with private contractors, venture capitalists and universities spurred the economy. Ex: under John Kennedy, NASA funded Fairchild’s work on integrated circuits (microchips) because they needed smaller computers if they were going to send them on rockets to the moon, or Moscow- computer chips are found in all kinds of devices today. In summary: Government-funded research (ex: DARPA- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) led to much of the technology that surrounds us. Government-funded innovation continues today
- the Cold War arms race spurred the postwar economic boom
- Its nonsense to argue that taxpayer- funded government spending can’t produce results when the military-industrial complex shaped our modern economy. We exist in the shadow of Cold War military spending
- The government also spurred growth by subsidizing college tuitions, especially via the GI Bill
- It’s within this framework that American private enterprise has thrived.
- Briefly summarize the origins of the Internet.
DARPA’s most significant contribution was ARPANET, the precursor to the Internet, created along with NORAD’s SAGE so that radar and missile sites could communicate with each other in case of a first-strike nuclear attack by the Soviets. Even the computers the Internet ran on were the product of government research during WWII and the Cold War, and Air Force funding at Stanford created the first search engine in 1963. For twenty years, the Internet was mainly the domain of government, military, and academics at research centers. But the invention of the World Wide Web (or “Web”) by British computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee in 1989 allowed for a broader system and most Americans were online by 2000.
- Discuss the origins and politics of America’s highways. Who pays for them?
Eisenhower also spurred economic growth by promoting and signing the gas tax-financed Interstate Highway Act of 1956 that built on earlier state legislation dating back to the 1920s. It began as part of the New Deal Roosevelt pushed, but after Pearl Harbor, FDR allocated resources and the most skilled workers toward the Alaskan Highway for defense. Ike had military efficiency in mind primarily, envisioning a four-lane system similar to the German Autobahn he’d seen during WWII that armed convoys could move around on, with the updated version having high enough overpasses (17 ft.) that nuclear warheads could pass underneath. Interstates were the biggest federal project in US history and had the potential to unite our country- funded by public/government. They made transportation and trucking much more efficient.
The 2012 GOP (republican) platform called highways civil engineering and mass transit social engineering. Also, leaders chose how hands-on they want to be with zoning- Houston’s leaders chose to let the city grow with less interference and their decision to build the Houston Ship Canal rather than use Galveston as the main port was political too.
Open-access free roads funded by the federal government became the prevailing pattern. In between were state/county-funded routes and farm-to-market roads. Of course, non of the roads were really free. To the extent that exhaust fumes are unhealthy, healthcare costs were higher than what they would have been with more mass transit. Excise taxes on oil, vehicles, and tires went towards road construction in a “self-fueling system”. These taxes are nearly invisible to the public because they’re charged to wholesalers rather than retailers, but they’re mostly passed on to consumers
Why did America choose roads over passenger/commuter rail?
America chose roads over passenger/commuter rail because suburbs were orientated around (private) car commuters rather than buses or subways. Plus, retail catered to cars with drive-in movies, fast food and cleaners, and shopping malls at the intersections of major highways.
What’s the purpose of the 4-lane interstates?
Our previous 2-lane roads were not very practical. A lot of buildings were flush up against the right of way, making expansion to four lanes impossible. Also, 2-lane cross country routes could be a nightmare for Blacks and Hispanics with few establishments they were allowed in and they were more lively to accidentally drive into segregated towns. Additionally car, truck, oil, and tire companies had been pushing city and state multi-lane freeways for a while. New Jersey and Pennsylvania pioneered the four-lane system with their Turnpikes, but the prevailing pattern for larger arteries ended up being open-access free roads funded by the federal government.
- Identify White Flight and analyze how race and class played into urban expansion and freeway construction in the postwar period.
Segregation was key to real estate development across the country. The GI Bill (law that provided a range of benefits for some of the returning WWI veterans) awarded 4% long-term mortgages to white veterans, and the long-term mortgages initiated by the New Deal’s Federal Housing Authority starting in 1934 provided working Americans affordable housing. Also suburban neighborhoods discouraged outsiders from passing through with cul-de-sacs and dead ends which provided a sort of maze. Banks and VA agents administering the GI Bill usually denied benefits to black veterans. White Flight is the large-scale migration of white people from areas becoming more racially/ethnically diverse. Many white people moved from inner cities to suburban neighborhoods, where many homebuyers often had to sign covenants promising to never re-sell their property to Blacks, Hispanics, or Jews (private neighborhoods had more control over how to direct property taxes). The Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. Kraemer (1948) that these covenants weren’t unconstitutional as long as they were private agreements and not government-mandated. However, the government, far from being neutral or helping minorities, had instead encouraged racism since the New Deal by redlining all-white areas on maps and awarding them lower-rate mortgages. Minorities got subprime interest rates on their loans from the Federal Housing Authority. Local banks also developed their own redlining guidelines. The effect of this initial racism compounded over generations creates a vast economic disparity.
- When a homeowner sold to a minority, realtors descended on their neighbors like locusts warning them to sell and move before the whole neighborhood transitioned to a ghetto and their homes lost their value.
- Block-busters, some even paid black people to walk through the neighborhood before making their pitch
- the government’s federal housing authorities, in effect, punished financially those that weren’t racist enough with their interest rate policies.
- The private sector didn’t help either (National Association of Real Estate Board), would not sell to successful black men
- Some of these policies even survived the 1968 Fair Housing Act
- After WWII many cities had donut-holes of poverty and rubble in the center surrounded by a donut of prosperity in white suburbs.
- By the late 20th century moneyed people started reinvesting in dilapidated inner-city homes, gradually gentrifying neighborhoods and driving up tax rates on existing minority homeowners, who sometimes migrated to the suburbs (if they were accepted)
- Eminent domain: governments are allowed to force you to sell your property if they need it to expand or build a freeway. Property values were lower in minority neighborhoods, so they were often the target of this.
As a case study, how did Austin encourage racial segregation?
In Austin they encouraged racial segregation by tearing out a high-value street, East Avenue, and then conveniently situated I-35 to separate east and west Austin. This effectively used the interstate as a physical barrier to affirm segregation and reinforce a 1928 city plan for a “Negro district” on the Eastside between 6th and 19th, with Hispanics between 6th and 1st.
As a case study, how did Austin encourage racial segregation?
In Austin they encouraged racial segregation by tearing out a high-value street, East Avenue, and then conveniently situated I-35 to separate east and west Austin. This effectively used the interstate as a physical barrier to affirm segregation and reinforce a 1928 city plan for a “Negro district” on the Eastside between 6th and 19th, with Hispanics between 6th and 1st.
- Summarize what made the 1960 election between Richard Nixon and John Kennedy one of the more compelling in modern history.
The 1960s was the most explosive decade of the 20th century, including the Civil Rights Movement, urban riots, protests, cultural revolution, Vietnam War, Space Race (all things Kennedy’s administration had to deal with), and four political assassinations: John Kennedy, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Robert Kennedy. Also, this was when the liberal status became cemented in the Democratic party. John Kennedy’s death in November 1963 brought an end to the “the Fifties” as any pretense of a unified country came unraveled.
Nixon and Kennedy had much in common. However, one of the most controversial things about Kennedy was his Catholicism. Many questioned his religious qualifications for office. JFK stressed religious freedom and his independence from the Cathoic Church so much that he alienated the Vatican. Kennedy was hesitant on civil rights, he harbored a lot of prejudice himself. Kennedy had a better campaigning presentation than Nixon, even though the republican had good arguments. To gain Texas in the electoral college, LBJ became JFK’s vice president, despite their dislike for one another. It was a tight race and Kennedy won- Protestant Democrats didn’t turn out in good numbers, but his endorsement of MLK paid off in black voters and Catholics turned out in sufficient numbers. Kennedy was also the youngest president up until that point.
Identify Kennedy’s New Frontier and his most significant legislative achievements.
Kennedy’s New Frontier agenda was dedicated to winning the Space Race against the Soviets that began under President Eisenhower in the 1950s. He used his family’s wealth to invite intellectuals, scientists, and artists to dinners at the White House. JFK embraced press conferences, arguing and joking with the press. He also invigorated NASA, with spending increasing from 0.5% to 4.5% of the federal budget to compete with the Soviets who were off to a quicker start. He boldly claimed that the US would land a man on the Moon by the end of the decade. His investment was paying off when they got people into space the following year. JFK was also willing to use space research to improve Soviet relations. He suggested merging the American and Soviet space programs, but Khrushchev rejected the offer. Government spending on space and weapons boosted the economy and JFK lowered taxes some in 1963 (top bracket 91% -> 77%). JKF also pushed harder than Eisenhower (he predecessor) on civil rights, but kept a safe distance from MLK in order to not alienate southern Democrats. However, he did vote against the 1957 Civil Rights Act as a senator that Ike had signed. JFK helped lay the foundations for the monumental Civil Rights Act of 1964, but he opposed making voting rights part of it for fear of it sinking the bill. Kennedy also reintroduced food stamps, increased unemployment insurance and expanded school lunches and support for mental health.
The Equal Pay Act was spurred into action by former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt’s work with the United Nations on human rights and the status of women, JFK sighed Congress’s Equal Pay Act outlawing sex discrimination in pay for equal work. Activists pressed for change and, over the next couple of decades, women won the right to sit on juries in all 50 states, serve in the military on mostly equal terms, and establish credit without relying on a male relative. Additionally, Title IX ensured that girls and women could play high school and college sports, domestic violence shelters were established, and every state outlawed marital rape.
- Analyze what can we learn about conspiracy theories from those surrounding the Kennedy assassination
There are many different contradicting conspiracies surrounding Kennedy’s assassination. They are an excellent demonstration of how skeptical we should be toward conspiracy theories. There were various conflicting parties, including the Mafia, pro-Castro Cubans, Soviet KGBm and Lyndon Johnson, with some versions accusing the CIA and FBI as either being complicit or at least enabling cover-ups.
Why does it present a problem if more than one Kennedy assassination conspiracy sounds convincing?
The problem with unraveling the Kennedy assassination isn’t that conspiracies don’t actually exist or that this particular batch seems implausible. The problem is how compelling various freestanding theories can sound in isolation. Since the theories conflict, we know that they’re either all wrong or, at the most, just one is right. Collectively, then, they show how good and plausible wrong theories can sound. Also, be wary of magnitude: the larger the web of supposed conspirators, the more unlikely it would be for everyone to keep the secret for long, to say nothing of pulling it off in the first place. Think of how much fame and fortune would go to whoever spilled the beans. Finally, be wary of equating motive with a crime in this and other conspiracy theories. To ask who profits from something (Latin cui bono) is smart, but insufficient. Johnson wanting Kennedy dead, if true, would not mean he was behind the assassination by any stretch and the same is true of Castro, the Mafia, etc.
- Identify Barry Goldwater
Barry Goldwater was an eccentric Arizona Republican Senator running against Lyndon Johnson (D) after JFK’s assassination. Republicans in the post-FDR era didn’t dare take on the New Deal. Barry Goldwater, though, was a straight shooter with independent convictions. Domestically, he strayed away from fell Republicans by voting against the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that outlawed racial discrimination in public places, and he didn’t support national intervention forcing states to allow minorities to vote (Is protecting voters’ rights in a democracy really an abuse of government power?). He wasn’t really racist himself; he’d integrated the Guard in Arizona and hired Blacks to work in his own department store. But he opposed using the national government to protect minorities’ civil rights, earning him the devotion of racists, North and South. And he wasn’t above courting the racist vote. Additionally, Goldwater promised Nelson Rockefeller that he’d work with him and Eisenhower to remove the last vestiges of racism, segregation, and discrimination. After he was nominated for the 1964 Election, Barry Goldwater didn’t make the usual move to the center to win the general election, he stuck to his conservative convictions.* -> got crushed in the presidential elections (LBJ won) and the Democrats swept power in the House and Senate-> most liberal era in American history
- * He emboldened a strong grass-roots movement among young conservatives that blunted liberalism’s advance by the late 1970s
- launched a broader movement that transcended racism
Barry Goldwater was an accomplished amateur photographer. Despite Goldwater’s principled social libertarianism — supporting gay rights in the military, being pro-choice, and a critic of the religious right — he was nonetheless the godfather of the conservative revival that blossomed in the 1980s and beyond, though later versions were more evangelical and pro-life. He was the first staunch (open and firm about his beliefs) conservative to run for the GOP since the New Deal of the 1930s, opposing the graduated income tax, hoping to make Social Security optional, and vowing to ramp up aggression against communism beyond the Truman Doctrine of containment. He also wanted discretionary use of nuclear weapons put under the Pentagon’s control rather than the President.
analyze how the 1964 Election triggered a shift in voting patterns for presidential elections.
The 1964 Election triggered a shift in voting patterns for presidential elections as the GOP became more inclusive, or at least stopped wanting to use government intervention in discrimination. A century after the Civil War, Lincoln’s party was taking a backseat to the former party of the Confederacy on race. By 1964, liberals and conservatives were at each other’s throats over the issue of freedom, but they didn’t agree on what freedom meant. For liberals, freedom meant citizenship for all Americans; for conservatives, it meant not using the government to protect the citizenship of all Americans. LBJ won the election but Goldwater’s victory in the Southeast, due mainly to his opposition to the Civil Rights Act, was noteworthy, signaling the most dramatic electoral shift since the Civil War. Before then, it was very rare for a Republican to win significant electoral votes in the southeast. Nationwide, no Democratic presidential candidate since 1964 has won a majority of white voters.
In terms of civil rights, Republicans became associated with the less supportive side, while Democrats became more progressive. Most of the old Confederate States started voting republican for the first time. Also, a lot of Republicans didn’t want the national government forcing civil rights policies, Barry Goldwater especially believed in states choosing whether or not to let minorities vote.