Exam Flash Cards
(101 cards)
(R. Ball) IFRS wants? 3 Answers
Lower cost of capital, Information Transparency, More efficient cross-boarding transactions
(R. Ball) Example of cost reduction by adapting IFRS?
Less analytical costs, less cost of creating standardized international financial databases
(R. Ball) Less risky for the investors mean?
Lower required return on equity.
(R. Ball) From a Social Welfare perspective?
The anticipated outcome would be increased wealth, due to increased valuation of existing capital and increased capital creation.
(R. Ball) Adaption of IFRS: Corporate governance?
Improve corporate governance via several channels. More transparent could enhance monitoring by boards, investors, analysts, rating agencies, press, etc.
(R.Ball) Mergers crossboard?
Enhance mergers with the higher information transparency.
Conclusion of (R.Ball)?
For IFRS to work, it has to be adapted in many countries. Many countries still stay with their local GAAP, which makes it hard. US and China is two key countries that need to adapt before IFRS really will work.
(Cormona and Trombetta) “Consequences” of IFRS/IAS? 2 answers. (Principle-based)
Accountants and auditors needs to have more knowledge(good knowledge), Only Big 4 auditors (costly)
Label users? (Cormona and Trombetta)
Label users = uses the flexibility of IAS/IFRS standards to keep on using their usual financial reporting strategy under the new international label
Label users good or bad? (Cormona and Trombetta)
The positive effects of adoption are more pronounced for serious adopters than label adopters.
Mandatory vs voluntary? (Cormona and Trombetta)
It’s shown that voluntary adaption to IFRS/IAS is better than mandatory.
Mandatory vs voluntary, why? (Cormona and Trombetta)
Higher accounting quality. (Small companies maybe don’t have the resources to adopt IFRS because of higher educational costs?)
Harmonisation process? (Read only) (Cormona and Trombetta)
The harmonization process will also benefit from the ‘‘global” nature of both auditors and their clients. Arguably, auditors and clients will drive forward common interpretations and practices around the world. Global clients willing to reduce the steps needed to unify the accounting information produced by local subsidiaries will promote this process. Consequently, global auditors may push forward harmonization through consistent interpretation to accommodate the needs of global clients. In this manner, auditors will also be facilitating the global character of business. In turn, the number of global clients in favor of globally harmonized interpretations will arguably increase and this will enhance the comparability of financial statements across countries.
Consequences with “combining” IFRS and local GAAPs (Cormona & Trombetta)
Different views on accounting standards and practices could result in difficulties.
Emerging Markets? (Cormona)
Lobbying is a problem with big emerging countries who wants to influence IFRS/IAS
Result from Bessemir, (2018)?
Benefits more than costs.
Private companies who adapts IFRS, pros? Bessemir, (2018)
Higher growth rate, higher leverage alternatives, higher capital raise in public debt and equity markets
Private companies who adapts IFRS, pros continue? Bessemir, (2018)
Companies adopt to IFRS to lower the risk of asymmetric information and avoid adverse selection and moral hazard problems
Important factors as legal form and ownership type? (Bessemir)
Public companies and PE companies are more likely to adopt to IFRS for lower their potential agency costs arising from the separation of ownership and control.
Differences between a public market and privat market? (Bessemir)
Transparency and high-quality financial reporting in the private market is relatively low, because information asymmetries between the firm and the key contracting parties are typically resolved via private information channels.
Economic Theory suggets what for PE companies vs. IFRS/IAS? (Bessemir)
PE companies only adopts IFRS/IAS if the benefits are higher than the costs
Big Multinational PE companies should adopt IFRS because? (Bessemir)
Information transparency for investors and other international stakeholders
Costs of IFRS adoption? (Bessemir)
Transition costs (educate employees, new research team), Big 4 auditor because of their higher knowledge
High Tech industry and IFRS? (Bessemir)
Higher adoption because of information complexity and wants to lower their information asymmetry towards stakeholders