exam II Flashcards

(58 cards)

1
Q

reliability

A

consistency of a measure; increases as number of items/observations increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2 components of all measures

A

true score
measurement error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

assess reliability with…

A

pearson r coefficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

test-retest reliability

A

measuring same individuals at two points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

issues with test-retest reliability?

A

artificially inflated correlation, some variables are meant to change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

internal consistency reliability

A

consistency among items within a measure, uses responses at only one time point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

split-half reliability

A

correlates scores from one half of measure with scores on other half
Spearman-brown split half reliability coefficient (reliability corrected)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

cronbach’s alpha reliability

A

data on individual items!
correlating each item to every other item in the scale
α = average inter-item correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

item-total correlations

A

data on individual items!
correlating each item score with the total score
helps eliminate items that are less internally consistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

interrater reliability

A

extent to which raters agree in their observations
cohen’s kappa
operational definition is key!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

construct validity

A

is the operational definition adequate?
does the test measure what it is supposed to measure?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

face validity

A

measure appears “on the face of it” to measure what it is supposed to
not very sophisticated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

content validity

A

comparing content of measure with reality/definition of construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

predictive validity

A

does the measure predict future behavior?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

concurrent validity

A

examines relationship between scores on a measure and criterion behavior measured at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

convergent validity

A

scores on the measure correlate well with scores on a another measure of the same construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

discriminant validity

A

measure is not related to variables in which it should not be related
can discriminate between the measure and other potentially related variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

qualitative approach

A

observation of behavior in natural setting or descriptions of world/participants
interviews, focus groups, open ended questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

quantitative approach

A

specific behavior can be counted
statistical analysis
surveys/observations with coding schemes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

naturalistic observation issues

A

ethics of concealment
nonparticipant observer vs participant observer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

naturalistic observation limitations

A

not always appropriate for well-defined hypotheses
population/time/resources/location difficult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

systematic observation

A

observation of several specific behaviors in specific setting
behavior quantified with coding scheme
natural or lab setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

systematic observation coding system

A

system for rating behaviors of interest, usually for frequency or degree
establish interrater reliability (cohen’s kappa)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

systematic observation limitations

A

equipment, reactivity, long periods of time better for data

25
case study
detailed description of a single person/small group of persons OR a single setting
26
H.M.
partial retrograde amnesia unable to recall recent past
27
phineas gage
damage to frontal lobe emotion/personality/goals
28
types of archival research
statistical records, survey archives, communication records
29
content analysis
coding system to quantify information in record
30
survey 3 general types of quesitons
demographics/facts, attitudes/beliefs, behaviors
31
"yea-saying" or "nay-saying" response sets
respondents employ a response set to agree or disagree with all statements
32
simplicity
phrase questions to be more simple / therefore understandable
33
loaded questions
avoid emotionally charged words, insinuating ideas through question or not being specific
34
negative wording
confusing wording that can sound like opposite question
35
semantic rating scale
bad _ _ _ _ x _ _ good
36
labeling response alternatives can...
can influence responding with frequency presented
37
larger sample size is better for...
generalizing and detecting an effect that actually exists (reducing type II error rate)
38
probability sampling
each member of the population has a specifiable probability of being chosen
39
nonprobability sampling
do NOT know probability of any member being chosen
40
simple random sampling
each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample
41
stratified random sampling
population is divided into subgroups (strata) randomly select members from each stratum
42
cluster sampling
identify clusters of individuals, clusters are randomly chosen, all individuals in cluster are included in the sample
43
haphazard "convenience" sampling
selecting a sample from environment in any way that is convenient
44
purposive sampling
identifying a criterion, conveniently sample from population
45
quota sampling
sample reflects the numerical composition of the population
46
sampling frame
the actual population of individuals or clusters that a random sample will be drawn from
47
continuous measurement scales
interval and ratio allow for means and standard deviations
48
measures of central tendency
mean, median, mode
49
variability measures
range and standard deviation
50
comparing group percentages measurement
nominal IV, nominal/ordinal DVs inferential statistic = chi square
51
correlating individual scores measurement
interval/ratio IV, interval/ratio DVs individuals measured on two variables inferential statistic = pearson r or multiple regression
52
comparing group means measurement
nominal IV, interval or ratio DV compare mean response of participants in two or more groups inferential statistic = t test or ANOVA
53
correlation coefficient
a statistic that describes how strongly variables are related to one another
54
pearson r coefficient
-1.00 to 1.00 detects only linear relationship measure of effect
55
small v medium v large effect
small (r ≈ |.10|) medium (r ≈ |.30|) large (r ≥ |.50|)
56
r2
percentage of shared variance between two variables
57
multiple correlation/regression
when you have more than one IV (predictor) predicting a single DV (criterion)
58
partial correlation
correlation between two variables of interest, with the influence of third variable removed from original correlation statistically controlling third variable