exam II - chapters 6 and 7 Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

deontology

A

a theory accessing the morality of an action in terms of duty or rightness itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the store owner who was trying to decide whether or not to cheat her customers

A

she chose not to cheat her customers because it wouldn’t be right and didn’t want anyone else to go out and cheat their customers as a universal moral law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

universal moral law

A

if it applies at all it has to apply to everybody in the same situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

autonomous lawmakers

A

a person who follows the categorical imperative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kant’s Moral Theory “the Categorical Imperative”

A

a test to determine the right thing to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

5 criticisms of the Categorical Imperative

A
  1. consequences do count
  2. categorical imperative cannot solve conflict between two duties
  3. allows for a loop hole (can’t rob a bank because you are broke)
  4. concept of rational may ambiguous
  5. allows for no exceptions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

means to an end approach`

A

tool or an instrument to achieve a goal, something instrumental value in the achievement of something with intrinsic value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“right to a person akin to a thing”

A

gray area between a person and a thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

internal lie

A

a lie you tell yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

external lie

A

lie you tell someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

3 definitions of equailty

A

fundamental
social
equal treatment for equals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

fundamental equality

A

people should be treated as equals by their legal system and their government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

social equality

A

idea of people being equal in a social setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

equal treatment for equals

A

when someone has a special need then he/she becomes an unequal who needs assistance to reach the level of an equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ronald Dworkin

A

rights can’t be traded for benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

John Locke (libertarian)

A

introduced the idea that people have three negative rights: life, liberty, and property

17
Q

John Locke (libertarian)

A

introduced the idea that people have three negative rights against the government: life, liberty, and property

18
Q

Positive rights

A

right to receive (socialist viewpoint)

19
Q

3 of the 5 common approaches to punishment are forward looking

A

deference, rehabilitation, incapacitation

20
Q

2 of the 5 common approaches to punishment are backward looking

A

retribution and vengeance

21
Q

types of justice

A
  1. distributive
  2. forward looking
  3. backward looking
  4. criminal/ lex talions
  5. restorative
  6. retributive
22
Q

Ronald Dworkin argued their are two models for our political thinking about rights

A
  1. must seek a balance between the rights of the individual and the needs of a society
  2. basic rights should never be abridged because of possible harmful social conflicts
23
Q

distributive

A

how to distribute the goods of society fairly

24
Q

forward looking

A

focuses on future consequences

25
John Rawes (looked as justice as fairness)"original position"
how to distribute the goods of society fair | how to reach a fair distribution
26
backward looking
wants compensations for past wrongs regardless of present situation
27
criminal/ lex talions (an eye for an eye)
same as retributive
28
restorative
punishment is inhumane- therapeutic rehabilitation
29
retributive
if you commit the crime you must be punished | let the punishment fit the crime
30
3 differences between retribution and vengeance
1. retribution is based on logic whereas vengeance is emotional 2. retribution is a public act(within the authority of the government) where as vengeance is in private (by citizens) 3. retribution wants punishment to fit the crop whereas vengeance maybe accessive
31
vengeance is NOT
legitimate because it is based on emotion