Exam Revision Flashcards
(132 cards)
Socialisation
The process through which the child acquires beliefs, behaviours, and values of his or her community.
Psychological theory
Set of concepts and “if/then” propositions that explain why patterns of behaviour (or other phenomena) occur.
Overarching Controversies in Human Development
- Initial state as good vs. bad
- Nature vs. Nurture
- Child as active vs. passive
- Development as continuous vs. discontinuous
- Development as universal vs. particularisatic/ideographic
Overarching Controversies in Human Development:
1. Good vs. Bad
Are children inherently good or bad?
⭐️Debate among early philosophers:
- Bad: Original sin (Hobbes, 1600s): child as selfish egoist that must be controlled.
- Good: Innate purity/ noble savage (Rousseau, 1700s): intuitive sense of right and wrong, can be misdirected.
- Neither: Tabula rasa/blank slate (Locke, later 1600s)
⭐️The debate is really about nature vs. nurture
Overarching Controversies in Human Development:
2. Nature vs. Nurture
⭐️Is nature (biological forces) or nurture (environmental forces) the primary influence on development? (Watson)
Contemporary view: relative contribution of nature/nurture depends on aspect of development. Development is seen as a result of the dynamic interplay between biology and environment over time.
⭐️How do N and N interact?
Overarching Controversies in Human Development:
3. Active vs. Passive
⭐️Are children actively involved in their development and largely determine how agents of society treat them, or passive recipients of environmental influences?
A child is considered active in development whenever any child characteristic influences the environment he or she experiences.
Middle ground: Development is best described as a continuous reciprocal interaction between child and environment.
Overarching Controversies in Human Development:
4. Continuity vs. Discontinuity
⭐️Does development occur in an abrupt or gradual and continuous manner?
Continuity: smooth and continuous growth (think ramp) - changes in QUANTITY e.g. pine tree; implies a sense of connectiveness between earlier and later developments
Discontinuity: abrupt changes (think stairs)/developmental stages - changes in QUALITY e.g. butterfly: changes in kinde; changes in degree; progress through developmental stages
Overarching Controversies in Human Development:
5. Universal vs. Particularistic
⭐️Is development universal (stage theorists) vs. particularistic?
⭐️Emphasis on normative development versus individual differences in developmental outcomes. However both perspectives are needed and inform each other.
Developmental universals ignore all the facts that conspire to make each of us unique. (N)
Baby Biography
A detailed record of an infant’s growth and development over a period of time.
⭐️Darwin (1877)- made daily records of the early development of his son.
⭐️First glimmering of a systematic study of children
Limitations:
- Observations were made at irregular intervals, and different biographers emphasised very different aspects of their children’s behaviour
- Data provided was therefore not often comparable
- Observations were subject to parents’ biases to record pleasant or positive incidents while downplaying negative ones
- Each baby biography was based on a single child ➡️⬇️ generalisability
Theory
A set of concepts and propositions designed to organise, describe, and explain an existing set of observations.
Scientific theory
Is a public announcement that indicates what a scientist believes to be true about his or her specific area of investigation.
They allow us to organise our thinking about a broad range of observations and events.
Critical as they provide us with a lens through which we might interpret any number of specific observations about developing individuals.
Characteristics of a good theory:
- Parsimonious: one that uses relatively few explanatory principles to explain a broad set of observations.
- Falsifiable: one that is capable of generating predictions that could be dis confirmed.
- Heuristic: one that continues to stimulate new research and new discoveries.
- Hypothesis: a theoretical prediction about some aspect of experience. If confirmed, will lead to a much richer understanding of the phenomena under investigation.
Early Philosopical Perspectives on Human Nature
Hobbes (1651/1904) doctrine of original sin: children as inherently selfish egoists who must be controlled by society.
Rousseau (1762/1955) doctrine of innate purity: children are born with an intuitive sense of right and wrong that is often misdirected by society.
Locke (1690/1913): the kind of an infant is tabula rasa, or “blank slate”, that is written upon by experience. In other words, children were portrayed as neither inherently good not bad, and how they will turn out should depend entirely on how they are raised.
Developmental stage
A distinct phase within a larger sequence of development; a period characterised by a particular set of abilities, motives, behaviours, or emotional that occur together and form a coherent pattern.
Research Methods
⭐️Self-report
- Questionnaires
- Interview: Clinical method: response to Q determines next Q
⭐️Observation
- Naturalistic
- Structured
⭐️Case Study
⭐️Ethnography
Research Methods:
Self Reports:
Questionnaires
Assess self-perceptions, thoughts, feelings, past experiences, evaluations of hypothetical situations.
➕
Quick, inexpensive
Standard- everyone gets the same Qs
➖
Participants not able to describe experiences in owns words (loss of richness)
Dependent on reading/language ability (difficult in studying children)
Research Methods:
Self Reports:
Interviews
➕
Great depth in short period
Participants describe experience in own words (more richness)
➖
Social desirability- may present yourself in a more positive way
Dependent on verbal ability- can be used with younger but not incredibly young children
Labor intensive data processing
Structured and semi-structured interviews
➕
Standard set of questions, comparable across interviewers
⭐️⬆️Generally used because it enables us to compare findings from researcher to researcher
Unstructured (“Clinical”) interview: relatively unstructured open-ended questions, answer to 1 Q determines the next
➕
Responsive to uniqueness of each individual
➖
Variation across interviewers
Research Methods:
Observation
➕
Behaviour is not inferred
Not dependent on verbal ability
➖ Observer influence or bias Some events too rare to observe Some phenomena are unobservable Expensive as it's time-consuming and takes a long time to observe children and takes a lot of skill to learn how to use a coding system
Naturalistic observation: goal is to get a representative example of some typical behaviour.
➕
Naturalistic/good ecological validity- child observed in real-life context
➖
No controls- children observed under different environmental conditions won’t have the same opportunity to display certain behaviours; aren’t able to control for influences/factors that may be impacting and causing a child to behave in a certain way
As many events are usually happening at the same time in the natural setting, and any of them may be affecting people’s behaviour, it’s difficult to pinpoint the causes of participants’ actions or of any developmental trends in behaviour.
Structured observation
➕
Controlled lab environmental, children have same opportunity to display certain behaviours
Most feasible way of studying behaviours that occur infrequently or are not openly displayed in the natural environment
➖
Lacks ecological validity because lab differs from real-life contexts
Evidence of Objectivity
⭐️Reliability: repeatability: measure similar if repeated at short interval or across observers.
-Short-term temporal stability: test-retest reliability (r)
-Interrater reliability: agreement among different types of informants
>Questionnaires: alpha, degree that items hang together
>Observations: kappa, percent agreement minus chance agreement
⭐️Validity: measures what intended to measure.
- Convergent validity: agreement (r) among different types of informants or among different measures of similar construct
- Predictive validity: predicts as expected
- Face validity: the content of measure maps on well to the content you’re wanting to study; the content matches how the content has been defined
General Research Designs
⭐️Correlational: information father about relation among variables without manipulation.
➕
Good ecological validity
➖
Can’t infer cause and effect (but if relation emerges over time this increases confidence)
⭐️Experimental: involves the manipulation of variables (IV)
IV= predictor
DV= outcome or criterion
➕
Stronger cause and effect arguments
➖
Poor ecological validity- field experiments can help
Sometimes now possible or unethical to manipulate
Developmental Research Designs:
Longitudinal
Same participants studied over time.
➕
Captures individual change over time
Ideal for studying how earlier factors relate to subsequent development
Can assess the stability of various attributes and the patterns of developmental change for each person in the sample
Can identify general developmental trends
Helps to understand the bases for individual differences in development
➖
Expensive, slow
Selective attrition (non random loss of participants during a study, resulting in a nonrepresrentative sample)
Practice effects
Measures become outdated
Cross-generational problem: the fact that long term changes in the environment may limit conclusions of a longitudinal project to that generation of children who were growing up while the study was in progress.
Developmental Research Designs:
Cross-sectional
Assess children of different ages at once.
➕
Quick, relatively inexpensive
Doesn’t suffer from selective attrition or practice effects
➖
Doesn’t capture individual change (different children are studied at different ages)
-Individual change over time vs. cohort effects
Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Research Designs:
Cohort Effects
Age-related difference among cohorts that is attributable to cultural/historical differences in cohorts’ growing-up experiences rather than to true developmental change.
Can be considered either a limitation or strength of the study.
Findings applicable to particular time and places.
⭐️Limits generalisability but highlights how particular environments influence development.
May draw general principles from findings if qualified by certain environmental conditions.
Scientific method
An attitude or value about the pursuit of knowledge that dictates that investigators must be objective and must allow their data to decide the merits of their theorising.
⭐️It’s a valuable safeguard that helps to protect the scientific community and society at large against flawed reasoning.