Extra 3 Flashcards

(16 cards)

1
Q

Obscenity

A

Any item which could corrupt or deprave the people seeing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case is that from

A

Hickling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is law governed by?

A

Obscene publication act 1959 and 1964

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s1(2) OPA 1959

A

Includes wide range of media

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

S4

A

Defence to obscenity if its interest of education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1964 act what did it restrict

A

no financial gain from obscene material.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outraging public decency

A

common law offence that deals with things which are obscene or immoral.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outraging public decency cases

A

Shaw
Gibson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who proves defamation

A

C on a BOP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the Claimant prove

A

Cause harm to reputation
Prove defamatory
Prove publish to third party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defences to defamation s2

A

Truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defences to defamation s3

A

Honest belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defences to defamation s4

A

Publication on public interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Protection from harassment act 1997

A

Pursuing a course of conduct amounting to harassment
Conduct which puts victim in fear of violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Malicious communications act 1998

A

Letter, email, message which is false or dangerous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Malicious communications act 1998 case