Factors affecting the accuracy of EWT Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

What are the two main factors affecting EWT?

A

Misleading information
Anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What two categories come under misleading information?

A

Leading Questions
Post Event Discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a leading question?

A

A question that wrongly implies something about an event or crime, such as ‘did you see the bike?’ implies that there was a bike

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does a leading question affect the accuracy of EWT?

A

This affects the accuracy as it contaminates the witness’ memory and so they recall inaccurate information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who did research into leading questions?

A

Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the aim of Loftus and Palmer’s research?

A

To investigate whether the phrasing of a question can affect an individuals witness of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the method of Loftus and Palmer?

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the sample of Loftus and Palmer?

A

45 split into groups of 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the procedure of Loftus and Palmer?

A

All ppts were shown the same video of a car crashing into another one and were asked a leading question with a different verb
Smashed, hit, collided, bumped, contacted
‘How fast were the cars going when the cars …. each other?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the verbs used in Loftus and Palmer?

A

Smashed, hit, collided, bumped, contacted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the question asked in Loftus and Palmer?

A

‘How fast were the cars going when the cars …. each other?’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the findings of Loftus and Palmer?

A

ppts guessed a higher mean for the cars that smashed in comparison to those that contacted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the conclusion in Loftus and Palmer?

A

The wording of a question can influence a ppts memory of an event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the strength of research into leading questions?

A

It has led to practical applications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What practical applications does research into leading questions have?

A

Led to improvements in the criminal justice system and the development of the cognitive interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What part of leading questions led to the development of the cognitive interview?

A

Avoids leading questions by instead using open questions to trigger information to improve recall
This means that there is a higher accuracy of EWT

17
Q

What is a criticism of Loftus and Palmer’s research?

A

Lacks mundane realism

18
Q

What is meant by post event discussion?

A

Where witnesses of an event discuss it after it occurred together

19
Q

What are the two ways in which post event discussion reduces the accuracy of EWT?

A

Memory contamination
Memory Conformity

20
Q

What is memory contamination?

A

When co-witnesses discuss the event and their information gets combined, which then alters the memories of the event to be inaccurate

20
Q

What is memory conformity?

A

Witnesses conform to what other witnesses say in order to gain social approval or they believe that the other witness is right, whilst they are wrong

21
Q

Research to support post event discussion was conducted by who?

A

Skagerburg and Wright

22
Q

What was the procedure of Skagerburg and Wright’s research?

A

Showed ppts two versions of a mugging, one where the mugger had dark brown hair, the other where he had light brown hair
Ppts had to discuss what they saw in pairs, each haven seen a different version
It was found that their report was a combination of what they saw, that he had medium brown hair.

23
Q

What is a weakness of Skagerburg and Wright’s research?

A

Done in a controlled environment so the outcome of EWT isn’t important as it would be in real life

24
What is meant by anxiety?
A strong emotional and physical state that affects EWT
25
Why does anxiety affect EWT?
Extreme anxiety has been found to negatively impact the accuracy of EWT as witnesses only focus on certain aspects of the event so their recall is limited
26
What was the aim of Johnson and Scott's research?
To investigate the effects of anxiety on accuracy of EWT
27
Who did research for anxiety?
Johnson and Scott
28
What was the method of Johnson and Scott?
Lab experiment
29
What was the procedure of Johnson and Scott?
Ppts either placed in high or low anxiety condition High anxiety condition - weapon focus, ppts heard an argument and sound of breaking glass, and a man holding a knife covered with blood walked out of a room Low anxiety condition - ppts heard an argument and a man holding a pen with grease walked out of the room Ppts had to then identify the man using 50 photographs
30
What were the findings of Johnson and Scott's research?
Ppts in low anxiety accurately identified man 49% of time Ppts in high anxiety accurately identified man 33% of time
31
Conclusion of Johnson and Scott
Anxiety caused weapon focus, so ppts focus on a certain aspect of the event, meaning their recall was limited, due to the fear of the situation
32
Who is research to contradict Johnson and Scott by?
Christianson and Hubinette
33
What was the procedure of Christianson and Hubinette?
They interviewed 58 real life witnesses of a bank robbery where some were directly threatened
34
What were the findings of Christianson and Hubinette?
Recall was over 75% accurate across all witnesses, with those being directly threatened having even more accurate accounts
35
Why do the findings of Christianson and Hubinette contradict Johnson and Scott?
Real life example of where higher levels of anxiety helped the criminal to be caught
36