Fall 2024 Midterm Flashcards
(158 cards)
The __ classification system is an older system (1999) that was used in the development of a classification system for periodontal disease and conditions
Armitage
What are the 2 advantages of the Armitage classification system
Comprehensive review of periodontology
Clinical attachment levels highlighted
Patients under 25 must be evaluated for a differential diagnosis of
Molar/incisor pattern periodontitis
(aka: aggressive periodontitis; localized juvenile periodontitis)
In people under 25 with molar/incisor pattern periodontitis, assess for localized bone loss associated with the __
first molar and incisor teeth
(also assess OH relative to disease)
__ calculus is a frequent finding with chronic periodontitis
Subgingival calculus
Chronic periodontitis has a slow to moderate rate of progression, but may have periods of __
rapid destruction
What systemic disease is chronic periodontitis most often associated with
Diabetes mellitus and HIV
Chronic periodontitis can be modified by factors other than systemic diseases such as __ and __
Cigarette smoking and emotional stress
Whether chronic periodontitis is localized or generalized depends on the
percentage of sites affected (6 sites per tooth : mesial, buccal, lingual, distal ..)
What classifies generalized chronic perio
> 30% of sites affected
On both anterior and posterior teeth
(Can also be defined as perio without a clear pattern of disease distribution of affected teeth)
What classifies localized perio
<30% of sites affected
Usually only on posterior teeth - no anterior
What is the exception to localized chronic perio
Aggressive incisor and molar pattern
If a pattern exists with chronic perio, is it generalized or localized
Neither, descriptive terminology is more accurate
(Ex: chronic periodontitis localized to max. molars with severe lesions on the premolars)
We do NOT use this classification system, but it can be seen in older chart note. Severity of clinical attachment loss and armitage system of diagnosis
Slight chronic perio =
Moderate chronic perio =
Severe chronic perio =
1-2 mm of attachment loss
3-4 mm of attachment loss
>5mm of attachment loss
Disadvantages of Armitage
Time consuming
Inaccuracies from probing angles
Root length disregarded
Difficult to determine CEJ
Systemic disease and local factors ignored
Doesn’t account for pseudopockets
CAL stands for
Calculated attachment loss
Measurements taken for CAL are in relation to the
CEJ
If the patient has gingivitis there is
NO attachment loss
The gingiva is inflamed; assume the negative reciprocal for pocket depth that are 1-3mm
(Do NOT need to enter this in the chart)
PIC in notes
When there is gingivitis and theres a pseudo-pocket of 4+ mm (the probe did not contact the CEJ) what must you do
You MUST put the negative reciprocal into axium (cant leave it out of the chart like with 1-3mm depths on gingivitis). Failure to do so will indicate a true pocket
Why is is important to chart correctly for gingivitis patients
Distinguishes prophys (D4341) from SRPs (D4342) or scaling with inflammation (D4346)
(Scaling with inflammation is used when theres no root to scale, or with younger patients that have sub gingival calculus and edema, or patients with associated pharmacologic effects)
If the patent has chronic periodontitis (true pocket) with a gingival margin above the CEJ what do we chart for GM
Assume -2mm for the gingival margin measurement to account for the gingiva above the CEJ
(Does NOT contribute to the true pocket depth)
Patients with sub-gingival calculus on enamel without CAL loss are __ for SRP
not appropriate
When there is recession present, how is GM charted
with a positive number instead of a negative number to show the true attachment loss
(Pocket + GM = attachment loss)
Exposure of the root surface by an apical shift in the position of the gingiva
Recession