Families Flashcards
(90 cards)
couples
Different types of conjugal roles
conjugual role: refers to the separation of roles within the household based
integrated conjugual roles: There are few divisions between the roles of men and women within the family
couples
Two explanations for unequal division of labour
edgell
-
cultural explanations- divisions is determined by partriarchal norms and values in our society. society expects women to perform domestic labour
- e.g. gender wage gap. = despite equaql qualifications/job performance, womnen often work low paid part timee jobs, society prioritises men as breadwinners. - material explanations - women earn less money than men which means its more economically benefitial for them to do childcare and housework while men perform the breadwiner role.
couples
same-sex couples and gender scripts
- radical feminists argues that heterosexual couples are patriachal and unequal - even when women are in paid-work.
- they contrast with same-sex couples e.g. dunne discovered that lesbian couples with children found a more equal division of labour.
- men are taught their superior - 1in 4 experience violence - taight to be submissive
- dunne uses the idea of gender scripts: heterosexual couples were socialised into gender scripts that set out different masculine/feminine roles and gender identities
- lesbians did not link households taks to gender scripsts, so they were more open to negotiation and thus more equal
resources and decision making
- Inequality similarly exists in terms of decision making and resources.
- Barrett: Men gain more from women’s domestic work than they give back in financial support.= Men usually make the decisions about spending on important items.
- In many households women have no entitlement to a share of household resources. The money that she does have she will see as it should be spent on the children. Therefore most women are in poverty, even in houses with adequate incomes!
- Pahl & Vogler (Feminist Sociologists) : Two main types of control over family income
- Allowance System – Men give non-working wives an allowance to budget and meet the family’s needs.
- Pooling – Both partners have access to income and have joint responsibility for spending – e.g. joint bank account.
the dark side of the family
domestic violence
- defined as Physical, emotional, sexual abuse
1. RADICAL FEMINIST EXPLANATION: Dobash and Dobash– domestic violence is evidence of patriarchy. Men dominate women through domestic violence. - however - Not all men are aggressive, How about female violence against men and children?Lesbian domestic violence? = For example, the ONS shows that w/c women, women struggling with illness and young women were more likely to experience domestic violence than others
1. materialist explanation- Focuses on economic and material factors such as inequality. - Some groups e.g. children, the poor are also more likely to be at risk
- wilkinson argues that lack of resources, money and time results from stress of family members caused by inequality and poverty.
- marxists feminits also see inequality producing domestic violence. ansley
- evaluation: Ignore the impact of domestic violence on the victim and justifies the behavior of the violent individuals
couples
Symmetrical family
w+y
- willmott and young argues that family life is gradually becoming more symmetrical - they believe that it is becoming more equal.
- Men and women share roles within the family more equally including leisure time = men have become more home-centred
- men help with housework+chilcare =’the new man’
- This is due to changes in women position and higher standards of living
&
Geographical mobility - more couples live away from the communities in which they grew up in
however this is critisced by feminist, they believe that w+y exagerrate men’s role, and that women can never become equal as they still perform the dual burden of paid work+domestic = oakley.
functionalist view of the fam
- Functionalists see the family as one of the essential institutions for a stable societies.
- They tend to to see the nuclear family as the ideal family for industrial societies.
- They believe that society is based on a value consensus – a set of shared norms and values – into which society socialises its members.
- This enables its members to cooperate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve shared goals.
Murdock 4 functions of the family
- Stable satisfaction of the sex drive (sexual)– within monogamous relationships= prevents inferentiality
- The biological reproduction of the next generation – without which society cannot continue.
- Socialisation of the young (education) – teaching basic norms and values
- Meeting its members economic needs – producing food and shelter for example. (in modern society it has become a unit of consumption only)
by performing these functions, the nuclear family heelps to maintain social stability.
criticism of Murdock
- Feminist argues that traditional family structures typically disadvantage women. = benefit men more.
- Functionalism may prevent social change, as it encourages individuals to stick to specified roles. It also sees non-participation in society as undesirable, as this can lead to anomie
- Functionalists theories do not always reflect family life (married people live in harmony, good in bed, effective socialisers).
- other institutions could perform the functions above.
Parsons 2 irreducible functions of the fam
Result of the loss of functions: 2 irreducible functions
similar to murdock, males and females are biologically suited.
- Primary socialisation of the young - equipping the next generation with basic skills and society’s values. = to not become deviant - gender role socialisation. If primary socialisation is done correctly then boys learn to adopt the ‘instrumental role’ – they go on to go out to work and earns money. Girls learn to adopt the ‘expressive role’ – doing all the ‘caring work’, housework and bringing up the children.
- Stabilisation of adult personalities - often referred to as the ‘warm bath theory (the idea the males coming home to the family will be equivalent of getting a warm bath, capable of soothing and washing away the worries of work) this enabling adults to relax so they can return to the workplace and perform their roles effectively. = provided emotional security
functionalists
parsons division of labour
- identifies two marital roles: the instrumenal role of the male breadwinner and the expressive role of the female carer
- ## this division of labour is functional = he sees this division as biologically based = so that everyone benefits from this specialism.
Parson - organic analogy - functionalist
- argued that the family was a part of the organic analogy.
- society is made up of different but interdependent parts such as insitutions like the education system, religion etc
- The human body is an analogy of society. If an organ fails, the body suffers, just like if the family becomes dysfunctional, society would collapse. - anomie
Marxist view of the Family
- Take a conflict approach and view the family as a state agency which serves to spread the dominant ideology = promoting false consciousness to maintain capitalism.
- They work alongside media and education as agents of social control within the organic analogy. They see the family as helping class inequality, benefiting capitalism.
The nuclear family performs:
- ideological functions for Capitalism & teaches passive acceptance of hierarchy (Zarestky)
- acts as a unit of consumption
- inheritance of property (Engels)
The family as an Ideological Apparatus - Zarestky
- children are socialised into false consciousness and passive acceptance/obedience of the inequalities of capitalism. = think that inequality is justifiable and the capilaist system is unchangeable
- this is achieved when there is a hierarchy in most families.
- Teaches children to accept there will always be someone in “authority” who they must obey, (parental power) which then prepares them of the hierarchy of boss-worker in paid employment in later life.
he also agues
That the family acted as a “safe haven” from the oppression and exploitation of capitalism whereby they could managed there resentment of it which helped to maintain capitalism by preventing revolution or resistance.
Engels: Inheritance of property
- The family exists so men can pass their private property onto their biological offspring, notably a son.
- Its essential for monogamy (no inferentiality) - women was seen as essentially “prostitutes” who give sex under male control (reproductive purposes) for children in exchange for economic stability.
- ensuring that wealth remained in the hands of the bourgeoisie
- therefore when rich people die it is their children who keep hold of their wealth.
- The solution is to overthrow capitalism
Marxists function :
The family is a Unit of Consumptions
- Nuclear families are brainwashed into thinking capitalism is fair = which teaches lower generations to conform with the capitalist system.
- Families must keep up with the material goods/services acquired by their neighbours and peers e.g. family holidays, cars – this is known “Keeping up with the Joneses”
- The media targets children to persuade their parents through pester power to buy more expensive items.
overall critic of the functions of the fam: Marxism
- it’s too deterministic – it assumes people passively accept socialisation and family life, and that the future is pre-determined. There are plenty of families who reject this lifestyle and many families bring their children up to be independent thinkers = increases their social mobility. - can resist indoctrination
- The Marxist perspective ignores family diversity in capitalist society, the nuclear family is no longer the main type of family.
- In fact, family breakdown may be better for Capitalism – as divorce is expensive and more money has to be spent on maintaining family relationships and later on forming new families.
The new man
The ‘new man’ means couples have an equal share of housework and childcare.
e.g. strolling baby in buggy
keyword
dual burden
oakley
- women now do paid and domestic work
- research findings: 15% of husbands had a high level of participaation in households.
Rejects the March Of Progress view
keyword
triple shift = supporting evidence
Dunscombe and Madsen
- Women not only carry the dual burden of low paid and unpaid domestic work, but also have to do the emotional work.
- Women are encouraged to be more expressive and ‘emotional’ than men
- means that it is women who make more effort to make marriages and families work emotionally, by looking after children, reassuring fragile egos, comforting.
- howvevr sometimes wasnt always in return - dobash and dobash provide suppoeting evidence. they found violence was triggered when husbands felt that their authority was being challenged. they conclude that marriage legitimate violence by giving power to men
- seperatley - triple shift this is evident in contemporary society - during lockdown - many woman had the burdern of working from home, looking aftert the children and as well emotionlly be there for there kids - leading to overburdern
a further contribution of parson
Parson:
functional fit theory
Pre-industrial vs industrial
+
Evalutation
Loss of Functions
- Parsons has a historical perspective on the evolution of the nuclear family
- suggested the nuclear family formed as an adaptation to industrialisation
- His functional fit theory is that as society changes, the type of family that ‘fits’ that society, and the functions it performs changes too
- society has moved from pre-industrial to industrial
- Pre-industrial society based on agriculture, basic standards of living. = usually 3 generational extended family - everyone had a respobinily for the socialistion of the children = large family unit ‘fitted’ pre-industrial society
- There was also less need for the extended family as more and more functions, such as health and education, gradually came to be carried out by the state.
- as a result of industralisation, the families have become smaller - The nuclear family fits the more complex industrial society better, but it performs a reduced number of functions.
- critics: nuclear family argued not to have evolved due to industrialisation. outdated view. contemporary family types as suggested by W+Y argues the hardship of the early industrial period gave rise to ‘mum-centred’ w/c extended family
parson division of labour
Men and women have biologically suited roles that are functional for society:
Expressive role - Women = Homemaker (involves cooking, cleaning and looking after children)
Instrumental role - Men = Breadwinner (involves paid work, earning the income for the family)
Bott division of labour
Segregated conjugal roles - Division of labour between men and women, couple spends leisure time separately
Joint conjugal roles - couples share domestic tasks and leisure time.
overall evaluations of the functionalist
- ignores that single parent families can be adequately socialise
- dysfunction of the family (not always in harmony/effective socialisers e.g. dark side of fam, toxic childhood)
- Parson research is based on white American family. Doesn’t represent wider society (e.g. south Asian extended family)
- feminist argues that the family benefits men more than women