FINAL Flashcards
(81 cards)
Female Distribution Polygyny
If females group together, polygyny is more likely
Female Defense Polygyny
females in groups and males defend those groups of females (harems) against other males – usually causes a high variance in male reproductive success
Resource defense polygyny
female fitness depends on quality of non random resources. A male with control some resource therefore, access to females. Most-fit males with have the best resources and females have subsets of the male’s territory
Scramble Competition
females are widely disperse and males are focused on finding them during breeding seasons avoiding competition with other males or defending resources
Lek Polygyny
males defend territories that contain no resources for females and located on traditional display sites - male’s don’t provide parental care and females will visit the leks to watch the displaying males and either mate or leave.
leks
male display sites where females come to males
Hotspot Theory
males cluster because females tend to travel along certain routes that intersect
Hotshot theory
subordinate males cluster around a hotshot to with females are attracted
solitary sociality
solitary for all activities except mating
gregarious sociality
groups that are unstable in composition – aggregate for one or more activity in large groups
social sociality
stable association of groups , fixed membership - complex rules with kinship, individual recognition, social maintenance.
benefits of living in a group
dilution effect and Hamiltion’s Selfish Herd Principle
Increased Detection of predators
Mutual defense
cooperative hunting
Costs of living in a group
dominant/subordinate interactions
competition for food
parasites and disease
infanticide
dilution effect
if animals group together, each of them is less likely to be taken by a predator (safety in numbers)
selfish herd principle
other individuals in a group provide a sheild against predators (in many groups, animals in the center are better protected)
selfish interactions
donor benefits at expense of recipient - dominant individuals display this
-evolves because small % of individuals are selfish – doesn’t interfere with RS
mutualism
both donor and recipient benefit, evolves through cooperation as both receive benefits they wouldn’t have without help
reciprocity
both eventually benefit - but delayed
highly social, good memory, long lifespan,low dispersal. evolves through discrimination against cheaters and individual recognition, repayment opportunity
For reciprocity to evolve:
- individuals must have the opportunity to interact repeatedly
- the fitness benefit received must excess the cost of helping
- individuals must be able to recognize one another in order to reciprocate
Fitness
number of genes contributing to the next generation
direct fitness
a measure of reproductive or genetic success of an individual based on the number of its offspring that live to reproduce.
indirect fitness
a measure of genetic success of an altruistic individual based on the number of relatives (or genetically similar individuals) that the altruist helps reproduce that would not have otherwise survived to do so
altruism
recipient benefits at expense of donor, may suffer a cost to direct fitness
r - coefficient of relatedness
fraction of gene copies or alleles shared between two individuals as a result of common descent