Final quiz Flashcards
(116 cards)
Kotter’s Eight Steps for Organization Change
- Establishing a sense of urgency
- Build Coalitions
- Developing a vision and strategy
- Communicating the change vision
- Empowering employees for broad-based action
- Generating short-term wins
- Consolidating gains and producing more change (Don’t let up)
- Anchoring new approaches in the culture (Let it stick)
what is learned in handling organizational change
Organization Change: Theory and Practice
Eccho Yu
Rasshmi
Sotos
works primarily in the areas of
people analytics and survey research.HR
researcher at Microsoft
is a Senior Consultant at Daggerwing Group
Sotos
is a Senior Consultant in Deloitte’s Human
Capital,
Groups vs. Teams
Groups
• Members are assigned tasks/ work independently
• Individual outcomes/goals
• Interact to share information/resources
Teams • Work interdependently • Have common goals/tasks that they identify and pursue collectively • Interact to engage in work together
Types of Groups
Organizational Groups:
Groups whose members share common positions or
participate in similar work experiences
Identity Groups:
Groups whose members share some common biological
and/or socio-demographic characteristics and are subjected to similar social forces and historical experiences (e.g., race, class, gender, sexuality,
religion, ethnicity, etc.)
Forces in Groups
●Acceptable, legitimate, or proper behaviors, feelings, issues (e.g. being nice, logical thinking, the need for loyalty) ●What is explicit ●The task or stated purpose of the group ●Conscious intentions
●Unacceptable, illegitimate, or questionable behaviors, feelings ( sadness or crying, competition for power, feelings of isolation/tokenism)
●What is implicit
●What is being thought and felt but not stated
●Unconscious and irrational intentions
Group-as-a-Whole
● Groups are open, living, social systems
● Individual group members make up the system and simultaneously interact with it, but the focus is not on the individual; no one person is responsible for the dynamics of a particular system
● Groups have their own distinct
identity, separate from the mere
compilation of individual group
members
● Groups are affected by forces
“above” them in Wells’ Levels and affect
the levels “below” them
Group Life Provokes Anxiety
Estrangement vs. Engulfment
•I need you, yet I want my own independence.
Do I want to be attached to you at the hip, or do
I want to be on my own
Forces outside the individual and group as a whole can also “push” on the group, generating anxiety
Anxiety leads to engaging
in defense mechanisms at the group level
Splitting
The process of group members
unconsciously dividing the world into all good and
all bad
Restaurant is shit, food was great.
Projective identification
The process of:
○ Group members unconsciously disowning unwanted or ambivalently - held parts of themselves
○ Projecting those parts into others (who have a
valence to express those particular feelings)
Inducing: the expression of the unwanted
feeling
“Identifying” the unwanted feeling when someone else expresses it The group member expressing the feeling is doing so on behalf of the group Can be productive, in terms of necessary role differentiation in groups; is not always negative
Valence
● A predisposition based on one’s background, personality, social identities, etc., to naturally occupy a
similar informal role repeatedly in groups
● Valence dictates which projections will “stick” to group members like velcro, and which will “slide off” like teflon
Role Suction & Role Lock
● Role Suction: When the group unconsciously pulls a member into a particular needed role, e.g., ○The leader ○The note-taker ○The savior
● Role Lock: When a member is
unconsciously placed into a role in a group
and cannot get out of it
Collusion
● Collusion is “buying into” the dynamic. The group colludes in projective identification
○ The “receptacle” (e.g., the person receiving certain
projections that are unwanted by other group members)
colludes in projective identification
Scapegoating
An extreme form of projective identification; occurs when a group member is locked into a toxic role
Splitting & Projective Identification
Summary
●Splitting and Projective identification are defense mechanisms
●DISTORTIONS that serve to protect the group from experiencing anxiety about their own, internal dynamics and individual strengths and weaknesses
● Splitting can lead to ineffective inter-group collaboration. Splitting within a group degrades the ability of a group to accomplish a task.
● Excessive projective identification leads to ineffective group processes
●The full competencies and abilities of group members are not accessible
BART
- Boundary - observable and subjective measure used to distinguish members of a group from outsiders.
- Authority – the right to perform work, utilize resources and make decisions; the right to make decisions which are binding on others.
- Role – the duties, tasks, responsibilities, and expectations associated with a particular position (formal); one’s position or function in the group based on personal characteristics and group dynamics which may support or hinder the task (informal).
- Task – the primary task is the formal or official operationalization of the broad aims of the organization; the meaning or interpretation people put on their roles and activities.
Boundaries examples (BART)
Physical (Observable) Boundaries
○ Spatial (Space) – Borders and Perimeters
○ Temporal (Time) - Deadlines
Psychological (Subjective) Boundaries
○ Group’s understanding of who belongs and who does not ○ How do we know a group when we see it?
Boundary Characteristics
○ Permeable vs. Impenetrable
Boundaries limitations
Can cause conflict (turf wars)
limited (based on the boundary)
if boundaries are not clear, the boundary is ineffective
Authority example (BART)
Authority from above:
• Formal authority (delegated)
• E.g. Sheriff’s Deputy
Authority from below
• Informal and/or formal authority given by
subordinates of colleague
• E.g. Team leader, supervisor
Authority from within
• One’s individual capacity to take up his or her own authority (formal, informal, personal) based on his or her personality, personal history, and “authority figures in the mind.”
Role examples (BART)
- The duties, tasks, responsibilities, and expectations associated with a particular position;
- Informal vs formal (things you can say in job description vs not) example: secretary vs coffee maker
- The behaviors of individual members in response to the duties, tasks, responsibilities, and expectations associated with a particular position (“taking up a role”)
- Clarifying roles is especially important when you interact with the same person in different capacities
Roles in groups
Task Roles • Initiator / contributor • Information seeker • Opinion seeker • Elaborator • Coordinator • Evaluator / critic • Recorder
Socio-Emotional Roles • Encourager • Harmonizer • Compromiser • Gatekeeper and expediter • Standard setter • Group observer/commentat or • Follower
Problematic Roles • Aggressor • Dominator • Blocker • Recognition-seeker • Monopolizer • Advice-giver • Socializer • Intellectualizer • Acting superior...
Social identity and role
● Social identities: Encompass racial-cultural characteristics (i.e., skin color, hair color/texture, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation, age, ability/disability, etc.)
● Group membership is intricately connected to role and an individual’s affiliation with multiple social identity groups is related to types of roles that they will take up in service of the group’s task
Task (BART)
Primary Task: the formal or official task, the operationalization of the broad aims of the organization, usually defined by the chief stakeholders (overt).
Survival Task: what a group, organization or system must do to survive (often covert).
Uses of BART
- Personal interactions (e.g. family, friends)
- School/work groups
- Understanding others
- Understanding organizations!