Final Theories Flashcards
(35 cards)
What three ways do environmentalism of the poor/ecology of affluence movements differ?
Differences in
- organization structure
- origins of movements
- perceptions of the human/nature dichotomy
Inglehart’s theory of postmaterialism
the argument…
younger generations are shifting away from “concerns about economic and physical security” (material values) and are becoming more concerned with “freedom, self-expression, and the quality of life” (post-material)
the underlying premise…
we are better off today than before. as a result, we can afford to care about the environment
the findings…
where t`he materialist to post-materialist shift has occurred, support for the environmental movement and environmental action tend to be stronger
the problems…
- environmentalism of the poor in the developing world is more materialist than post-materialist
- greater environmental concern amongst the poor in places like the US
- recent shifts may tend to go against inglehart’s previous findings
- -recession made us more material again
The Paradigm shift thesis
The premise…
as the material effects of our system of production become more apparent, people have become more environmentally aware
The argument…
a shift is occurring from the “human exemptionalist paradigm” (HEP) to a “new environmental paradigm” (NEP)
HEP– humans are “exempt” from the natural laws and ecological constraints that govern other species
NEP– humans are a part of nature and need to live within an inherently interconnected ecological world
The study…
examined the difference between
environmental values: the way people think it ought to be
environmental beliefs: the way people believe it is
The findings..
environmental values haven’t quite caught up with our environmental beliefs
the problems…
trying to answer a temporal question (change over time) without longitudinal data
Ecological moderinization
the premise…
the recognition of environmental problems is starting to reshape the institutions and everyday social practices of modernity
the argument... material conditions (environmental problems) shape ideas, which in turn reshape material conditions (solve and resolve ecological problems)
what drives society to solve such problems…
ecological rationalization– environmental problems force us to increasingly consider more than economic, technological, political, and social reason for making decisions
Examples
montreal protocol regulation on global CFCs
the problems…
1) ecological modernization promotes the causes of environmental problems as solutions
2) ecological modernization is hobbled by an unflappable sense of technological, market, and governmental optimism
3) ecological modernization is only realistic in some places
The Denial Machine
The claims of deniers:
1) evidentiary basis of global warming is weak, if not wrong
2) net effect of global warming will be good for life, health, and agriculture
3) policies to ameliorate global warming will do more harm than good
the argument…
the conservative movement is a force of anti-reflexivity attempting to protect the industrial capitalist order of simple modernization
the theoretical underpinnings: Lukes three dimensions of power
1) decision making: protect subjective interests through direct conflict
2) non-decision making: confining the scope of decision-making to only issues that don’t seriously challenge their subjective interests
3) shape desires: prevent observable conflict from arising by shaping people’s perceptions, beliefs, and subjective interests via ideology and propaganda
Non-decision making techniques
- obfuscate, misrepresent, manipulate, and suppress the results of scientific research
- intimidate or threaten to sanction individual scientists
- invoke existing rules or create new procedures in the political system
- invoke an existing bias in the media
non-decision making technique 1: obfuscate, misrepresent, manipulate, and suppress the results of scientific research
How done?
- fund and promote publications by contrarian scientists with positions at odds with scientific consensus
- misrepresent research through errors of omission
- manipulate results of scientific research by altering government reports before their release
- suppressed scientific reports from government agencies
non-decision making technique 2: intimidate or threaten to sanction individual scientists
How done?
- individual scientists brought under investigation for non-climate change related issues
- government scientists told they cannot talk publicly without first having their comments cleared
non-decision making technique 3: manipulate results of scientific research by altering government reports before their release
how done?
- held open investigatory hearings where the results were pre-determined
- changed scientific rules that government agencies must follow
non-decision making technique 4: suppressed scientific reports from government agencies
- claim media is bias in order to get more coverage for climate skeptics
Climate of injustice
question…
what drives the non-cooperative behavior observed between the global north and global south in climate change negotiations?
answer…
inequaltiy
need to understand how inequality affects
- the problem structure of climate change
- -the triple inequality: responsibility, vulnerability, and mitigation - debates about development and sustainability
- trust, worldviews, and beliefs
the two pathways for international non-cooperation
1) the direct causal pathway:
north-south inequality –> lack of capacity –> noncooperation
2) the indirect causal pathway
north-south inequality –> structuralist worldviews/causal beliefs –> lack of reciprocity/generalized mistrust –> divergent and unstable expectations–>
1. emotional responses
2. inconsistent principled beliefs
3. risk aversion
4. zero-sum mentality
–> noncooperation
What is a commodity:
something produced for sale on the market
what is a fictitious commodity
things that are not produced for sale but are still sold (nature, labor, money)
neoliberalization
the definition…
the extension, intensification, and acceleration of market-based forms of competition and commodification to previously excluded or insulated realms of political and economic life
the parts..
privatization: when clear private property rights are assigned to forms of nature that were previously state-owned, un-owned, and communally owned
marketization: when forms of nature that were previously insulated from full=fledged market exchange are placed within the realms of self-regulating market
de and re-regulation
when a state is ‘rolled-back’ and minimized, providing individual actors and localities with opportunities to self-govern resources and the environment, but within a centrally prescribed regulatory framework
the placement of previous state-sponsored services into the hands of civil society:
when civil society groups are encouraged to provide the insulatory mechanisms that states once offered, or could offer, in order to offset the negative effects of the aforementioned processes
Greenwashing
the phenomena of socially and environmentally destructive corporations attempting to preserve and expand their markets or power by posing as friends of the earth
ecobranding
idea that capitalist consumption and sustainable living can go hand in hand… when a company or producer is making goods in order to actually create a more sustainable society
coercive vs. affective power
coercive power: takes control of the human psyche
affective power: empowers social energies/makes a person feel as if they are involved in making a product
the sustainability culture
political conception of sustainable living that struggles over the meaning and practice of sustainability
environmental inequality
underlying premise…
occurs when a specific social group is disproportionately affected by environmental hazards
dynamics that create and maintain environmental inequality
1) profit motives in the market economy push environmental concerns off onto those least able to resist
2) environmental inequalities unfold within the historical legacy of institutional racism
environmental racism
1) racial discrimination in environmental policy making
2) racial discrimination in the enforcement of environmental laws and regulations
3) targeting of community of colors for toxic facilities
4) excluding people of color from leadership in ecology movements
environmental justice
underlying premise
“all people and communities are entitled to equal protection of environmental and public health laws and regulations
the movement…
organized in the late 1970s and 1980s from grassroots organizations
the ideas
- upholds the notion that all individuals have the right to be protected from environmental degradation
- adopts a public health model of prevention (elimination of the threat before harm occurs) as the preferred strategy
- shifts the burden of proof to polluters and dischargers who do harm or discriminate or who do not give equal protection to racial and ethnic minorities and the poor
- allows disparate impact and statistical weight, as opposed to “intent” to infer discrimination
- redresses disproportionate risk burden through targeted action and resources
the results…
federal: environmental racism recognized, executive order 12898
local: shut down incinerators, close landfills, improvements in containing existing environmental risks
litigation: attempts to use title VI of civiil rights act to close pollution facilities
Frame analysis
premise…
organizations and movements have a discursive frame through which they interpret history. this discursive frame gives a movement or an organization its identity and usually guides its collective actions
step 1: the delegitimization of the dominant worldview
step 2: the creation of a new narrative/discourse
–>narrative/discourse functions to provide common values, provide rationale for participating, resocialize members
step 3: conflict with dominant worldview results in the collective action
the problems…
- limits alternatives
- can be exclusive
resource mobilization
underlying premise…
the capacities of a social movement or organization are influenced by material resources (money, supplies, members, etc)
social movements should be understood in terms of conflict
success measured by acceptance of ideas into the mainstream and/or by increased levels of material resources
problems…
money directs action
historical analysis
premise…
movements and organizations form in response to general social patterns and at specific historical moments
potential problems…
when the moment is over, so is the movement