Finals - Damages for Breach & Tort Case Recap Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

What is the primary purpose of damages in contract law?

A

To compensate the claimant and put them in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which case sets out the compensatory principle?

A

Robinson v Harman (1851)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three main types of damages?

A
  • Expectation loss
  • Reliance loss
  • Restitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is expectation loss?

A

Loss of bargain or profit the claimant expected to make.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is reliance loss and which case supports it?

A

Loss from expenses incurred in reliance on the contract – Anglia TV v Reed (1972)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case allowed for restitutionary damages in exceptional cases?

A

Attorney General v Blake (2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case sets out the test for remoteness of damage?

A

Hadley v Baxendale (1854)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the two limbs of the Hadley test?

A
  • Loss arises naturally
  • Loss was within reasonable contemplation of both parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the rule on mitigation and which case supports it?

A

Claimants must take reasonable steps to reduce their loss – British Westinghouse v Underground Electric (1912)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can damages be awarded for mental distress or loss of enjoyment?

A

Yes, but only in certain cases – Jarvis v Swans Tours (1973), Farley v Skinner (2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case introduced the ‘neighbour principle’?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which case reaffirmed the Caparo test in negligence?

A

Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (2018)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What case shows unlawful interference via smell/fumes?

A

St Helens Smelting v Tipping (1865)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the standard for private nuisance?

A

Substantial and unreasonable interference with use or enjoyment of land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can planning permission authorise a nuisance?

A

No – Coventry v Lawrence (2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What counts as indirect interference?

A

Noise, smells, smoke – not trespass, but can still be actionable in nuisance.

17
Q

What statute governs harassment?

A

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

18
Q

What is the test for harassment under the statute?

A

A course of conduct that a reasonable person would consider oppressive or unacceptable.

19
Q

Can harassment be both civil and criminal?

A

Yes – dual liability under the PHA 1997.

20
Q

What case recognised misuse of private information as a tort?

A

Campbell v MGN (2004)

21
Q

What are the two-stage test elements in privacy claims (Campbell)?

A
  • Reasonable expectation of privacy
  • Balance with freedom of expression (Art 8 vs Art 10)
22
Q

What Act modernised defamation law?

A

Defamation Act 2013

23
Q

What case outlines the serious harm requirement?

A

Lachaux v Independent Print (2019)

24
Q

What are the main defences to defamation?

A
  • Truth
  • Honest opinion
  • Publication on a matter of public interest
25
What are the four elements of Rylands v Fletcher liability?
* Accumulation * Non-natural use * Escape * Foreseeable damage
26
What case narrowed the scope of Rylands?
Transco v Stockport (2003)