Finals - Exemption Clauses & Accounts and Responsibility Flashcards

(24 cards)

1
Q

What is an exemption clause?

A

A term in a contract that seeks to exclude or limit liability for certain breaches or legal duties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can exemption clauses be incorporated into a contract?

A

By signature, by reasonable notice, by a consistent course of dealing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What case shows that signing a document binds you even if you haven’t read it?

A

L’Estrange v Graucob – bound by signed terms unless misrepresented.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the principle from Parker v South Eastern Railway?

A

Reasonable notice must be given of the clause before or at the time of contracting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When must the document containing the clause be one a reasonable person would expect to contain terms?

A

Chapelton v Barry UDC – a receipt isn’t a contractual document.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the contra proferentem rule?

A

Ambiguities in exemption clauses are interpreted against the party relying on them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case involved an onerous clause that needed special attention drawn to it?

A

Interfoto v Stiletto – unusual terms must be clearly highlighted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Photo Production v Securicor establish?

A

Clauses can exclude liability even for fundamental breaches, as long as properly incorporated and clearly worded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the purpose of UCTA 1977?

A

To regulate exclusion clauses in non-consumer contracts, especially in standard terms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the test under s.11 of UCTA 1977?

A

The reasonableness test: Is the term fair and reasonable in the circumstances known to the parties at the time?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Key case applying UCTA’s reasonableness test?

A

George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds – clause failed the reasonableness test due to inequality of bargaining power.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the Consumer Rights Act 2015 relate to exemption clauses?

A

It protects consumers against unfair terms, especially those excluding liability for death/injury or requiring disproportionate duties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the rule in Rylands v Fletcher?

A

A person who brings something likely to cause mischief onto their land is strictly liable if it escapes and causes damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the elements of Rylands v Fletcher liability?

A
  • Accumulation on land
  • Non-natural use
  • Escape
  • Foreseeable damage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What counts as ‘non-natural’ use of land?

A

Unusual or extraordinary use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the defences to Rylands v Fletcher?

A
  • Act of God
  • Act of a third party
  • Plaintiff’s consent or fault
  • Statutory authority
17
Q

Is Rylands now considered a subset of nuisance?

A

Yes – Rylands is part of private nuisance, not a standalone tort.

18
Q

What is vicarious liability?

A

A form of strict liability where an employer is held liable for torts committed by an employee in the course of employment.

19
Q

What case sets the test for vicarious liability?

A

Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society – two-stage test.

20
Q

How did Lister v Hesley Hall develop the law on vicarious liability?

A

Introduced the ‘close connection’ test.

21
Q

Can multiple defendants be liable for the same tort?

A

Yes – through joint and several liability.

22
Q

What is contribution in tort?

A

When one tortfeasor seeks to recover a fair share from others after being held liable.

23
Q

What’s the principle from Wilsher v Essex AHA?

A

Where multiple potential causes exist, claimant must prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant caused the harm.

24
Q

What’s the idea behind attribution of responsibility?

A

That liability should reflect degrees of fault and causation.