Finding food Flashcards

1
Q

why forage?

A

basic requirement for life
- cell metabolism

improve body quality
- status ornaments

feed breeding partner

feed offspring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

economics of foraging

A

maximise profits and minimise loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

time budget equation

A

time budget

= searching time + handling time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

handling time equation

A

handling time
= no. of prey taken in time T
x time spent handling 1 prey item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

number of prey taken in time T equation

A

number taken
= area searched
x prey density
x time searching

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

searching time equation

A

searching time
= number of prey taken in time T/
(area searched x prey density)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

complex time budget equation

A

time budget

= (Ha/ a H) + (Ha*Th)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

assumptions of budget time equation

A

all animals are identical
- same handling time

no variation in any of the parameters in space/time

no interactions between animals
- no prey excluding others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how is the environment patchy?

A

vary in:

food density

predator no.s

size + type of prey
- may exclude each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how many items should a parent collect?

  • best type of foraging
  • too few
  • too many
A

= optimal foraging

wasted time + energy on flying to food patch
-> not delivering much profit

lose prey items whilst foraging
+ increased risk of predation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

marginal value theorem (MVT)

A

considers economic costs of altering the value of another factor (e.g. energy costs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MVT in animal behaviour

- 3 axes on graph

A

loading curve
= no. of items taken to offspring

searching time
= time spent in food patch

travel time
= time spent between nest + food patch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MVT in animal behaviour

  • optimal searching time
  • longer travelling time means…?
  • longer searching time means…?
A

time that delivers highest profit at lowest travelling time

more time spent gaining nothing

results in some gain
-> gain increases with searching time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

marginal value equation in animals

A

marginal value
= food intake/
(travel time + searching time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how can the optimum time be altered?

A

change travel time
- longer travel time means longer optimum searching time + need to take more prey

change shape of gain curve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

when will optimal foragers spend longer in a patch of resources?

A

more profitable patches

as distance between patches increases

when whole environment in less profitable

17
Q

optimality models

  • similar to
  • key components
A

quantitative economic cost/benefit analyses

>constraints
>behavioural options
>'currency' 
- may be maximised e.g. food intake 
- may be minimised e.g. risk of predation
18
Q

optimality models

- pros

A

make testable + quantitative predictions

use explicit assumptions

general
- may be applicable to different organisms + behavioural situations

19
Q

optimality models

- cons

A

selection of constraints, behavioural options + ‘currencies’ may be incomplete/ hard to quantify
- e.g. predation risk often uses surrogate measures

if observed behaviour different to expected, how can discrepancy be explained?
- wrong model
OR
- animals behave non-optimally?

-> come up with new model with new constraint + hypothesis

20
Q

testing support for competing hypotheses

e. g. bird + mussels
- hypotheses

A

predicted:
prey on big mussels as most profitable

observed:
not many big mussels were taken

so rejected hypothesis

21
Q

testing support for competing hypotheses

e. g. bird + mussels
- what happened next?

A

made additional observations:

large mussels potentially excluded as too big + hard to open (encrusted with barnacles)

22
Q

trade off between starvation and predation

A

animals need to feed BUT also avoid being eaten

23
Q

trade off between starvation and predation

e.g. prey selection in 3-spined sticklebacks

A

presence of predator:
fish attack prey less frequently even if high prey density

2 competing factors from fish POV:
> probability of seeing prey again
> if they make an attack on prey, predator will see and eat them

24
Q

trade off between starvation and predation

e. g. body mass in birds
- benefits of energy reserves

A

fuel for foraging breaks

buffer against unfavourable foraging conditions

insulate body from environment

25
Q

trade off between starvation and predation

e. g. body mass in birds
- costs of energy reserves

A

acquisition
(time, energy, risk of injury)

maintenance (mass-dependent costs)

metabolic expenditure

pathological conditions
e.g. pulmonary stress

decreases locomotor performance

  • > fly slower + less agile
  • > increases predation risk
26
Q

trade off between starvation and predation

e. g. body mass in birds
- study of small passerine birds + sparrow hawks

A

absent hawks
= high body mass of small birds

increasing hawks
= decreasing body mass

established hawks
= low body mass

27
Q

how can we combine the various measures of performance into one?

what does this link?

A

reproductive success
= fitness
e.g. no. of offspring produced over life-time

foraging behaviour
predation risk
mating success
reproduction