flaws drill Flashcards
(83 cards)
Cereal AD: Fitness experts say that regal excursive is the most effective way to become physically fit, and studies that shown that adults who eat cereal everyday exercise more regularly than adults who do not eat cereal. So by eating Fantastic Flakes every morning, you too will be on the most effective path to physical fitness
Infers a cause from a mere correlation.
Americans are generally patriotic. So this individual American, Benedict Arnold, was a patriot.
infers that some members of a group have a particular characteristic merely from the fact that the group as a whole has it.
We studied adult firefighters at a single firestation in a small town. So, we know what all Americans do.
Draws a conclusion about all adults from a sample that is too small to be representative
Sleeping well contributes to a good LSAT score. So, if you sleep well and do nothing else, you will get a good LSAT score.
Infers that a given factor is the sole predictor of a result merely on the grounds that the factor had shown to contribute to that result
Committing a burglary makes someone a criminal. So clearly, burglary is necessary to being a criminal. John killed someone, but he didn’t rob them, so John isn’t a criminal.
Treats something as merely sufficient to produce a result as if it were necessary to produce that result
I could help my neighbor by buying them a lock. So I should buy them one, or I am a bad person.
Draws a moral conclusion from evidence that could only support a factual conclusion
I got a good performance review yesterday. And yesterday, the performance review I got was bad. So, I will……
Bases its conclusion on data that are contradictory
It doesn’t matter what the conclusion is: the data contradict each other.]
Lack of trust cause of crime. So clearly, crime is caused by lack of trust.
Circular reasoning, asserts in a premise what it is trying to establish in its conclusion
A lack of trust in one’s neighbours leads to their lack of respect for the law. A new study provides compelling evidence for this. Neighbourhoods in which people routinely lock their doors have higher burglary rates than neighbourhoods in which people do not routinely lock their doors.
Treats what could be the effect of something as if it were the cause of that thing
some have argued that body size influences mating decisions throughout all societies. Their argument rests largely on self-reports of university-age students and on analyses of personal advertisements in newspapers for dating partners.
Bases a conclusion on a sample that may be unrepresentative of the population about which the the conclusion is properly drawn
It is raining, and it is windy. So clearly, the rain is causing the wind.
[Argument made during a hurricane]
Concludes that one kind of event causes another kind of event without ruling out the possibility that both kinds of events are the result of a third kind of event.
John has listed three reasons why he made his decision. He liked the car, it was cheap, and the car has good reviews. So, clearly, John only bought the car because he liked it. I can’t see any other reason for why he bought it.
Concludes that an effect has only once cause in the face of evidence that the effect has multiple causes
In this society, people mate frequently. So clearly, this chaste monk from that society must mate frequently.
uses s claim that applies only to entire societies to draw a conclusion about individual persons
Americans speak loudly all the time. I can say this is true because I met one American, and she spoke loudly.
draws a universal conclusion on the basis of a very small number of individual cases
Wein claims that keeping animals in zoos is unethical. He points out that it involves placing animals in unnatural environmental merely for the sake of human amusement. However, since Wein sees nothing wrong with owning pets, and keeping pets surely involves placing an animal in unnatural environment merely for human amusement, his claim should be rejected.
Rejects a claim merely on the grounds that its proponent holds another view inconsistent with it
Weingarten is wrong about zoos. So anyone who argues about zoos is wrong.
inappropriately generalizes from a particular case
Weingarten says we shouldn’t have zoos. That’s monstrous. How can he be in favor of killing all the animals in zoos?
misrepresents the conclusion of the opposing argument
To be evil, you must cause harm. Frank caused minor harm today, without meaning to. So, Frank is pure evil.
Takes a necessary condition for a practice’s being unethical as a sufficient condition for its being so
This person says they are a professor of mathematics. So, when they say 2 + 2 = 5, I know I can trust them. No need to check their diploma.
Accepts a view as authoritative without establishing the authority of the source of the view
Luck isn’t necessary for success, because success doesn’t need luck.
Takes for granted in a premise what it is trying to prove in its conclusion
I see successful people often retire early. So, retiring early is the key to success!
It treats an effect of something as a the cause of that thing
The popular book written by a communist said that luck causes success. I hate communists! So, the book must be wrong.
it attacked the source of an argument rather than attacking the substance of that argument
Every accountant I’ve worked with has been from Chicago. So all accountants worldwide must be from Chicago.
The argument draws a conclusion on the basis of a general statement that has in turn been inferred from a very limited number of particular instances
Editorialist: Council members have no proof the plan is safe. So the plan must be unsafe.
Confuses the absence of evidence for the claim with evidence against the claim