Forensic Psychology Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

What is offender profiling?

A

Offender Profiling is a behavioural and analytical tool that helps investigators predict and profile the characteristics of unknown offenders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the two types of offender profiles?

A

Two types of offender profiles:
-Top-Down
-Bottom-Up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is top-down profiling?

A

Top-Down Profiling:
-American Approach (adopted by the FBI)
-Creates a profile of an offender that allows us to predict the type of offender that commited the crime
-Organised or Disorganised offenders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is top-down profiling based on?

A

Top-Down profiling is based on data gathered from interviews with 36 sexually-motivated killlers, such as Ted Bundy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the characteristics of an organised offender?

A

Characteristics of an organised offender:
-Shows evidence of planning
-Victim is deliberately targeted
-Maintains high level of control - leaves little amounts of evidence
-Above average intelligence and stable career
-Often married and with children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the characteristics of a disorganised offender?

A

Disorganised offender:
-Spontaneous offences
-Weapon and body usually left at scene - little control
-Lower than average IQ
-Unskilled employment
-Failed relationships, lives alone
-Residence tends to be close to the crime scene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How to construct an FBI profile?

A

Constructing an FBI profile:
1). Data assimilation (evidence is reviewed)
2). Crime scene classification (organised/disorganised)
3). Crime reconstruction
4). Profile generation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Top-Down approach to offender profiling evaluation

A

Top-Down approach to offender profiling evaluation:
- = Reductionist -> classification system too simplistic -> offenders may overlap
- = Simplistic -> applies to particular crimes -> based on sexually-motivated offences
- = Temporal validity low -> based on an outdated model
+ = Research support -> Caner’s metal analysis
+ = Real-world application -> Arthur Shawcross profiled enough that he was found at the crime scene -> however it is idiographic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the bototm-up approach to offender profiling?

A

Bottom-up approach to offender profiling:
-Generates a picture of the offender through systematic analysis of the evidence at the crime scene
->British model
-Does not begin with fixed topologies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of bottom-up profiling

A

Types of bottom-up profiling:
-Investigative psychology
-Geographical mapping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is investigative psychology?

A

Investigative psychology:
-Aims to establish patterns of offending behaviour likely to happen
-Helps develop the statistical database

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Assumptions of investigate psychology

A

Assumptions of investigate psychology:
-Interpersonal coherence (consistency between the way offenders interact with their victims)
-Time and place (time and location communicate
-Criminal characteristics (characteristics about the offender helps classify them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is geographical profiling?

A

Geographical profiling -> known as crime mapping -> uses location of crime to infer residence
-Canter’s circle theory: idea that serial offenders restricts offences to where they are familiar - forms circle around home base
-Marauder / Commuter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the marauder as stated by Canter?

A

The marauder - operates in close proximity to their home base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the commuter as stated by Canter?

A

The commuter = who is likely to have travelled a distance form their home base to commit their crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bottom-Up approach to offender profiling evaluation

A

Bottom-Up approach to offender profiling evaluation:
+ = Scientific and empirical measurement of crime -> makes use of statistical analysis -> objective
+ = Research Support (Canter)
- = Unsucessful utilisation -> Copson -> only 3% of cases led to the correct identification of an offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Canter’s meta-analysis study

A

Canter’s meta-analysis study:
-Analysis of 66 sexual assault cases
-Examined data using smallest space analysis
-Behaviours were found common across offences -> ‘case linkage’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline the historical approach to forensic psychology

A

Historical approach:
-Biological basis to behaviour - innate tendencies determined by genes
-Developed by Lombroso (1876)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What were the characteristics proposed by Lombroso for criminal behaviour?

A

Characteristics proposed by Lombroso for criminal behaviour:
-Narrow, sloping brow
-Prominent jaw
-High cheekbones
-Facial asymmetry
-Dark skin
-Physical irregularities (ie extra toes/fingers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Lambroso’s research

A

Lambroso’s research:
-Studied heads and faces of convicts in Native Italy
-Used 383 dead and 3839 living criminals
-40% accounted for by atavistic characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Lambroso’s research evaluation

A

Lambroso’s research evaluation:
- = Racial stereotypes -> Atavistic features mostly included African descent - = Contradictory research -> Goring compared criminals with non-criminals and found no particular characteristics
- = Lack of control group -> didn’t control confounding variables ie psychological disorders
+ = Contribution to criminology -> introduced the scientific approach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The genetic explanation of criminal behaviours

A

The genetic explanation of criminal behaviours:
-Suggests particular genes are involved
-Candidate genes
-Diathesis-Stress modeo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Lange’s twin study for the genetic explanation of criminal behaviour

A

Lange’s twin study for the genetic explanation of criminal behaviour:
-Found that most of the MZ and DZ twins had a co-twin also in prison

24
Q

The involvement of candidate genes in criminal behaviour

A

The involvement of candidate genes in criminal behaviour:
-The MAOA gene (linked to dopamin and serotonin and agressive behaviour) and CDH13 gene (ADD) associated with violent crimes

25
The diathesis-stress model in the genetic explanation of criminal behaviour
The diathesis-stress model in the genetic explanation of criminal behaviour: -Genetic bases of behaviour -> environmental trigger ie traumatic/dysfunctional childhood caused criminal behaviour
26
Neural explanation of criminal behaviour
Neural explanation of criminal behaviour: -How the structure and workings of the brain may be linked with criminal behaviour -Antisocial personality disorder (APD) -> neural explanation -> lack of empathy -Associated with the prefrontal cortex
27
Raine's research findings into the association of the prefrontal cortex and antisocial behaviours
Raine's research findings into the association of the prefrontal cortex and antisocial behaviours: -Brain imaging studies -Individuals with APD had reduced prefrontal cortex activity -> 11% less brain matter than control group
28
Role of the prefrontal cortex
The prefrontal cortex includes regulation of emotional behaviour ->Dysfunction in this area leads to a dysfunction in emotional response
29
Keyser's mirror neurones study
Keyser's mirror neurones study: -When criminals were asked to empathise with someone on film experiencing pain -> empathy controlled by mirror neurones activated -> suggests those with APD are capable of empathy but it is a process that can be switched on or off
30
Evaluation of the genetic and neural approach to criminal behaviour
Evaluation of the genetic and neural approach to criminal behaviour: - = Methodological issues -> Lange's Twin study -> poorly controlled (based on looks not DNA testing) -> concordance rate also not 100% - = Biologically reductionist - = Biologically Deterministic -> moral issue -> criminal justice system + = Research support Mednick
31
What was Eysenck's psychological theory on criminal behaviour?
Eysenck proposed criminal behaviour is due to innate personality traits, and is measured across three dimensions
32
Eysenck's criminal behaviour theory dimensions of personality
Eysenck criminal behaviour theory dimensions of personality: -Introversion-Extroversion -Narcotic-Stable -Psychotic-Sociable -Criminals would rate high on extroversion, narcotic and psychotic
33
Why are criminals typically extroverted (Eysenck's theory)
Extroversion -> -Underactive Nervous System -Lacks excitement -Don't learn from mistakes
34
Why are criminals typically narcotic? (Eysencks theory)
Narcotic: ->High levels of reactivity in the sympathetic nervous system -Nervous and unstable
35
Why are criminals typically psychotic (Eyesenck's theory)?
Psychotic: ->High tostesterone -Agressive behaviour
36
How is criminal personality measured? (Eyesenck)
Criminal personality measurement = Eyesenck Personality Inventory -> measures where on the dimensions a person is
37
What leads to criminal personality according to Eysenck?
Criminal personality: -Social Immaturity -Concerned with instant gratification due to a lack of socialisation (where people are taught to delay gratification)
38
Eysenck's criminal personality theory evaluation
Eysenck's criminal personality theory evaluation: + = supporting evidence -> Eysenck found criminals score highly on E,N,P dimensions than control group -> reduced reliability - = A meta-analysis contradicted Eysenck;s research as criminals were not found to score high across dimensions - = Suggests one type of criminal with same personality type -> reductionist as ignores other causing factors eg environment - = Mismeasurement of personality -> hard to quantify personality -> personality can be adopted to situiation nd not fixed - = Culturally biased
39
What is Kholberg;s different levels of moral reasoning?
Kholberg's level of moral reasoning: -Determining wether an action is right of wring -investigated by presenting them with imagined moral dilemmas -Basic level = rules seen to be obeyed as they involve punishment -Sophisticated level = considerations of factors such as human rights -He said criminals have lower levels of moral reasoning
40
The levels of moral reasoning
Levels of moral reasoning: -Level 1 = Pre-conventional -> simple need to avoid punishment and gain rewards -> Criminals are classed here -Level 2 -> Conventional -Level 3 -> Post-conventional
41
What are Kholberg's cognitive distortions?
Cognitive distortions: -Errors or biases in people's information processing system, categorised by faulty thiking -Used to explain how criminals interpret other's behaviour and justify their own -Eg hostile attribution bias and minimalisation
42
What is hostile attribution bias (Cognitive Distortions)
Hostile Attribution Bias: -Tendency to misinterpret the actions of others, seeing them as hostile or confrontationa when they aren't -Trigger for possible agressive behaviour
43
Minimalisation (Cognitive Distortions)
Minimilisation: -Denying or downplaying the seriousness of an offence -This may involve using euphemisms ('job' rather than robbery)
44
Kholberg's cognitive distortions evaluation
Kholberg's cognitive distortions evaluation: + = Supporting Evidence -> Palmer and Hollin -> offenders showed less moral reasoning when presented with moral dilemma - = Low levels of intelligence may be a bigger factor + = Real-world application -> offenders encouraged to confront seriousness of actions in CBT -> reducing denial and minimisation reduces re-offending
45
What is the differential association theory for criminal behaviour?
Differential Association Behaviour: -Suggests individuals learn the values, attitudes and techniques for offending behaviour through association and interaction with different people -Arises from: Pro-criminal attitudes and learning criminal acts
46
What are pro-criminal attitudes which increase criminality?
Pro-criminal attitudes: -Individual is socialised into a group where that are more pro-criminal attitudes then anti, they go on to offend -Includes disrepect for police and law
47
Learning criminal acts as a cause of criminality
Learning criminal acts: -Potential criminal learns the practicalities of how to carry out criminal acts -Takes place in groups and prison settings, explains high rates of re-offending in released prisoners
48
Socialisation in prison
Socialisation in prison: -Offers explanation for why so many convicts reoffend on realease -Assumes prisoners learn new skills and techniques from others in prison whilst surrounded by a criminal attitude
49
Differential Association Theory Evaluation
Differential Association Theory Evaluation: - = Difficult to measure -> based on exposure to criminal attitude which is hard to measure objectively - = Deterministic -> just because individual exposed to criminal attitude does not mean they become a criminal + = Considers environment -> lessens eugenics and biology + = Supporting research -> meta analysis found most offences were due to family criminality and poor parenting
50
What is the psychodynamic approach to criminal behaviour?
Psychodynamic: Blockburn suggested criminal behaviour occurs as a result of an underdeveloped superego → ID is given ‘free reign’ to carry out selfish impulses, which manifests as criminal behaviour -3 types of underdeveloped superego: Weak (due to absent same sex parent so doesn’t fully develop in childhood), Deviant (raised by criminal parent), Over-harsh (suerego focuses on punishment) → Considers the role of emotions which guides their moral behaviour -Idea of maternal deprivation (Bowlby) → lack of an attachment leads to affectionless psychopathy
51
Evaluation of the psychodynamic approach to criminal behaviour
+ = Contribution to criminology → links childhood experience and emotional basis of crimes - = Androcentrism → suggests women more likely to commit crime due to lack of castration anxiety in childhood → statistically males are more likely - = Hard to infer causality between childhood experience and criminal behaviour due to range of factors that could impact - = Lack of empirical evidence + Psychic determinism
52
What is Kholberg’s cognitive approach to criminal behaviour?
21. Kholberg suggested individuals ahve different levels of moral reasoning which can be investigated by presenting them with imagined moral dilemmas. He argued criminals have low levels of moral reasoning. →Levels of moral reasoning → pre-conventional, convential, post-conventional ⇒ criminals are pre-conventional (simple need to avoid punishment and gain reward) →Cognitive distotions ⇒ errors or biases in people’s information processing system categorised by faulty thinking → two examples of cognitive distortions are hostile attribution bias and minimilisation → Hostile attribution bias = Tendency to misinterpret actions of others seeing them as hostile when they aren’t → potential trigger for agressive behaviour → Minimalisation = denying or downplaying the seriousness of their offence → involves euphemisms (eg job rather than robbery) 22. Evaluate the cognitiv
53
Evaluate the cognitive approach to criminal behavior
+ = Research shown support for lower moral reasoning when criminals faced with imaginative moral dilemmas - = Individual differences in levels of moral reasoning - = Range of other explanations eg biological, psychodynamic, psychological + = Real world application → CBT → offenders face seriousness of their crime by reducing minimisation
54
What is custodial sentencing and its aims?
Custodial sentencing is where an offender spends time in a prison or other institution as punishment 4 main aims = deterrence (unpleasant experience), incapacitation (taken out of society due to danger), retribution (suffer to pay for crime), rehabilitation (reforming) → However there are psychological effects of incarceration → depression, suicide, instituionalisation (becoming accustomed to prison way of life makes it hard to adjust) →Prisonisation = adoption of an ‘inmate code’ where certain behaviours viewed unacceptable in society are rewarded in instiution settings → Recidivism = reoffending = over 50% reoffend, highest in UK and US → lowest in Norway which emphasis on rehabilitation
55
Evaluate custodial settings.
- = Negative psychological effects → such as depression → may not be effective in rehabilitation - = Arguments on alternative provisions that emphasise on restoring future prospects of jobs and family + = opportunity for rehabilitation which uses CBT - = Dfferential association theory suggests socialisation in prison increases reoffending → Recidivism over 50%
56
What is behaviour modification?
Behaviour modification programmes aims to reinforce obedient or desirable behaviour in offenders → based on behaviourist principle of conditioning → Token economies → based on operont conditioning → Positive reinforcement of good behaviour for rewards or punishment for bad behaviour → Designing and using token economies → operationalise target behaviours so its measurable, scoring system of how much behaviours are worth, train staff to standardise procedures
57
Evaluate behaviour modification of criminals.
+ = Easy to implement → doesn’t need specialist training and is cost effecitve - = Little rehabilitation value → token economy not maintainable outside prison system → obedience to laws not rewarded etc + = Supporting research → Field found high effectiveness - = Ethical issues → conditions are manipulative and dehumanising → such as lack of conformity leads to loss of priveleges