forensics Flashcards
(61 cards)
what is offender profiling and when is it used
- investigative tool used by the police
- narrows down list of suspects
- helps investigators accurately predict and profile characteristics of criminals
what are the main features of the top down approach
- originated from FBI (US)
-data was gathered by FBI from interviews with 36 murderers including ted bundy - concluded that they could be categorised into organised and disorganised
- relies on the profilers intuition and beliefs
- collect data about murdererer then decide category
what is the difference between organised and disorganised
organised is a planned crime with intelligence and the person is socially competent whereas disorganised crime is when clues are left, there is little previous involvement with the victim snd the person has lower intelligence
what are the steps on constructing a FBI profile
- data assimilation- reviews evidence and looks at background info, crime scene, murder type, time and location
- crime scene classification- categorised as either O or DO
- crime reconstruction- hypothesis of sequence of events and behaviour at the scene
- profile generation- hypothesis related to the likely offender eg physical characteristics or behaviours
what are the strengths of the top down approach
RESEARCH SUPPORT
-evidence towards organised category
- canter conducted an analysis of 100 us murders each by a different serial killer
- analysis revealed that there was a subset of features in the criminals that matched the organised type
HAS WIDER APP
- meketa reports that top down profiling has successfully been applied to crimes like burglary
- looking at crime scene and identifying classification and reconstructing crime scene has a positive effect
- 85% rise in solved cases in 3 us states
- has been successful in real life and helps police incr accuracy
what are the weaknesses of the top down approach
CAN BE HARD TO DISTINGUISH
-hard to distinguish between O and DO
- there are a variety of combinations that occur
- more of a scale and could be both
- there could be aspects of both in same crime
- contrasting characteristics like intelligence but spontaneous murder could occur
- may decrease validity and reliability of top down approach
ONLY APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN CRIMES
- may not be suitable to use this approach for some crimes
- for example cyber crime as its much harder to know details and work out who the person is ( may hide identity)
- may be therefore limited to certain crimes
- suspect could be difficult to identify
- could be multiple suspects with different personalities hard to identify all of them
LACKS SCIENTIFIC BASIS
- relies on intuition- subjective
- American so there may be cultural bias in the characteristics identified in each of the groups
what are the main features of the bottom up approach
- generate a picture of the offender
- uses systematic analysis of evidence from crime
- uk method that is data driven
what is investigative psychology and what are the features of this
- applies statistical procedures and psychological theories to analyse crime scene evidence
- features of this:
INTERPERSONAL COHERENCE- the way offender behaves at the scene may reflect behaviour in everyday situations
FORENSIC AWARENESS- individuals that have been in trouble before, behaviour may show this awareness for how people get caught (rapists who hide fingerprints)
SIGNIFICANCE OF TIME AND PLACE- may indicate where offender is living
what is geographical profiling and how is it used
- uses info about location of linked crime scenes to make inferences about home or base of offender
- based on the principle of spatial consistency
- used with other factors to create hypothesis
-CANTERS CIRCLE THEORY- offenders commit crimes in an imagined circle and this creates boundaries in which more crimes are likely to be committed
-MARAUDER- operates in close proximity to home
-COMMUTERS- travel distance away from residence
what are the strengths of the bottom up approach
SCIENTIFIC ADVANTAGE
- controlled, objective
- can be repeated
- much more scientific and objective than top down
- based on findings and evidence not intuition
- investigators can manipulate data quickly
- recently used and applied to a wide range of offences
EVIDENCE FOR GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING
- canter 120 serial killer murder cases in the USA
- small space analysis revealed spatial consistency in the behaviour of all killers
- bodies created a centre of gravity home base which helped in the identification in where they lived
what are the weaknesses of the bottom up approach
NOT SUFFICIENT ON ITS OWN
- reliant on the quality of the data that the police provide
- recording of the crime is not always accurate
- estimated 75% of crimes never even reported to the police
- argues that other factors are just as important (eg offender profiling)
- alone may not always lead to successful capture of an offender
MIXED RESULTS
- regarded in different ways by different police forces
- surveyed 48 police departments and found that advice provided by the offender profile was useful in 83% of cases
- same study also showed that in only 3% of cases it lead to the correct identification of the offender
what psychologist proposed the historical approach and what did they suggest
lombroso
- suggested criminals were genetic throwbacks
- that criminals were a subspecies that were biologically different from non criminals
what did the historical biological approach suggest
- offenders lacked evolutionary development
- the savage untamed nature made them turn to crime
- saw offending as natural tendency in genes of those that engaged in it
- innate and offender was not to blame
what is activistic form and what does it suggest about offenders
- the offender subtype had particular physiological markers linked to specific crimes
- mainly facial features
-offenders are physically different - narrow sloping brows, strong draw, facial asymmetry, high cheek bones and dark skin
what facial features are related to murderers
- bloodshot eyes
- curly hair
- long ears
what facial features are related to sexual deviants
- glinting eyes
- swollen lips
what was lombrosos research
- examined facial and cranial features of 383 dead Italian convicts and nearly 4000living
- concluded there was atavistic form
- concluded 40% of criminal acts committed by people with activistic features
what is the strength of the historical approach
MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO CRIMINOLOGY
- changed the face of the study of crime
- it is credited as shifting crime research away from the moralistic discourse towards more scientific
- attempted to describe how certain people commit particular crimes
- credited as father of crim
- lead to beginning of offender profiling
what are the weaknesses of the historical approach
DESCRIMINATORY NATURE
- attention drawn to racist undertones
- many of the features identified as activistic were mostly found among those of African descent
- suggests africans are more likely to be offenders
- subject and influenced by racial prejudices of the time
POOR CONTROL
-failed to control important variables
- didn’t compare offenders to normal control groups[
- these may have also incr crime rates like poverty
- does not meet modern scientific standards
NATURE OR NURTURE
- raises question of whether criminals are born or made
- this approach suggests there is a biological cause and it is genetically determined
- however even if criminals have ativistic features does not mean this is the sole cause
- facial differences may be due to poverty and poor diet
what are the two genetic explanations for offending
TWIN AND ADOPTION STUDIES
- studied 3500 twin pairs in Denmark and found concordance rates for offender behaviour of 35% MZ and 13% DZ
- data indicates not just behaviour that is inherited but also traits
CANDIDATE GENES
- genetic analysis of 800 offenders suggested 2 genes may be associated with violent crime
- MAOA regulates seritonon in brain and has been linked with aggressive behaviour
- CDH13 linked with substance abuse and ADHD
what are the tow Neural explanations for offending
neural differences in brains of offenders and non offenders
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
- lots of brain imaging studies demonstrate that people with antisocial personalities have reduces activity in prefrontal cortex
- this part of brain regulates emotional behaviour
- 11% reduction in grey matter
MIRROR NEURONS
- only when offenders were asked to empathise did empathy reaction activate
- controlled by mirror neuron’s
- not totally without empathy
- can switch on and off
what are the weaknesses of the biological approach to explaining offending behaviour
ISSUES WITH TWIN EVIDENCE
- assumption of equal environment
- assumed held constant as brought up together
- higher concordance rates for MZ than for DZ may simply be due to being treated more similarly
DETERMINIST
- suggests behaviour is determined by genetics and neural
- internal factors can not be controlled by the person
- idea that the person should not be held responsible for crime
- justice system is based on responsibility and free will
- complicates this principle
what are the strengths of the bio approach to explanaing offending behaviour
SUPPORT FOR GENETICS
- study when neither bio or adoptive parents had convictions , 13.5% of adoptees did
- figure rose to 20% when bio parents had convictions then to 25% when both had
- shows genetic inheritance plays a role but so does environment too
- support for diathesis stress
BRAIN EVIDENCE
- support for link of frontal lobe and crime
- researchers looked at evidence of frontal lobe damage and antisocial behaviour
- people with damage - Impulsive behaviour, emotional instability and inability to learn from mistakes
- associated with planning ability
what did Eysenck propose in his theory
- behaviour could be represented along 2 dimensions ( introversion- extraversion) (neuroticism - stability)
- dimensions combined form variety of personality characteristics and traits
- later added psychoticism- sociability