forensics Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

what is offender profiling and when is it used

A
  • investigative tool used by the police
  • narrows down list of suspects
  • helps investigators accurately predict and profile characteristics of criminals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the main features of the top down approach

A
  • originated from FBI (US)
    -data was gathered by FBI from interviews with 36 murderers including ted bundy
  • concluded that they could be categorised into organised and disorganised
  • relies on the profilers intuition and beliefs
  • collect data about murdererer then decide category
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the difference between organised and disorganised

A

organised is a planned crime with intelligence and the person is socially competent whereas disorganised crime is when clues are left, there is little previous involvement with the victim snd the person has lower intelligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the steps on constructing a FBI profile

A
  1. data assimilation- reviews evidence and looks at background info, crime scene, murder type, time and location
  2. crime scene classification- categorised as either O or DO
  3. crime reconstruction- hypothesis of sequence of events and behaviour at the scene
  4. profile generation- hypothesis related to the likely offender eg physical characteristics or behaviours
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the strengths of the top down approach

A

RESEARCH SUPPORT
-evidence towards organised category
- canter conducted an analysis of 100 us murders each by a different serial killer
- analysis revealed that there was a subset of features in the criminals that matched the organised type

HAS WIDER APP
- meketa reports that top down profiling has successfully been applied to crimes like burglary
- looking at crime scene and identifying classification and reconstructing crime scene has a positive effect
- 85% rise in solved cases in 3 us states
- has been successful in real life and helps police incr accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the weaknesses of the top down approach

A

CAN BE HARD TO DISTINGUISH
-hard to distinguish between O and DO
- there are a variety of combinations that occur
- more of a scale and could be both
- there could be aspects of both in same crime
- contrasting characteristics like intelligence but spontaneous murder could occur
- may decrease validity and reliability of top down approach

ONLY APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN CRIMES
- may not be suitable to use this approach for some crimes
- for example cyber crime as its much harder to know details and work out who the person is ( may hide identity)
- may be therefore limited to certain crimes
- suspect could be difficult to identify
- could be multiple suspects with different personalities hard to identify all of them

LACKS SCIENTIFIC BASIS
- relies on intuition- subjective
- American so there may be cultural bias in the characteristics identified in each of the groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the main features of the bottom up approach

A
  • generate a picture of the offender
  • uses systematic analysis of evidence from crime
  • uk method that is data driven
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is investigative psychology and what are the features of this

A
  • applies statistical procedures and psychological theories to analyse crime scene evidence
  • features of this:
    INTERPERSONAL COHERENCE- the way offender behaves at the scene may reflect behaviour in everyday situations
    FORENSIC AWARENESS- individuals that have been in trouble before, behaviour may show this awareness for how people get caught (rapists who hide fingerprints)
    SIGNIFICANCE OF TIME AND PLACE- may indicate where offender is living
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is geographical profiling and how is it used

A
  • uses info about location of linked crime scenes to make inferences about home or base of offender
  • based on the principle of spatial consistency
  • used with other factors to create hypothesis
    -CANTERS CIRCLE THEORY- offenders commit crimes in an imagined circle and this creates boundaries in which more crimes are likely to be committed
    -MARAUDER- operates in close proximity to home
    -COMMUTERS- travel distance away from residence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the strengths of the bottom up approach

A

SCIENTIFIC ADVANTAGE
- controlled, objective
- can be repeated
- much more scientific and objective than top down
- based on findings and evidence not intuition
- investigators can manipulate data quickly
- recently used and applied to a wide range of offences

EVIDENCE FOR GEOGRAPHICAL PROFILING
- canter 120 serial killer murder cases in the USA
- small space analysis revealed spatial consistency in the behaviour of all killers
- bodies created a centre of gravity home base which helped in the identification in where they lived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the weaknesses of the bottom up approach

A

NOT SUFFICIENT ON ITS OWN
- reliant on the quality of the data that the police provide
- recording of the crime is not always accurate
- estimated 75% of crimes never even reported to the police
- argues that other factors are just as important (eg offender profiling)
- alone may not always lead to successful capture of an offender

MIXED RESULTS
- regarded in different ways by different police forces
- surveyed 48 police departments and found that advice provided by the offender profile was useful in 83% of cases
- same study also showed that in only 3% of cases it lead to the correct identification of the offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what psychologist proposed the historical approach and what did they suggest

A

lombroso
- suggested criminals were genetic throwbacks
- that criminals were a subspecies that were biologically different from non criminals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did the historical biological approach suggest

A
  • offenders lacked evolutionary development
  • the savage untamed nature made them turn to crime
  • saw offending as natural tendency in genes of those that engaged in it
  • innate and offender was not to blame
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is activistic form and what does it suggest about offenders

A
  • the offender subtype had particular physiological markers linked to specific crimes
  • mainly facial features
    -offenders are physically different
  • narrow sloping brows, strong draw, facial asymmetry, high cheek bones and dark skin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what facial features are related to murderers

A
  • bloodshot eyes
  • curly hair
  • long ears
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what facial features are related to sexual deviants

A
  • glinting eyes
  • swollen lips
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what was lombrosos research

A
  • examined facial and cranial features of 383 dead Italian convicts and nearly 4000living
  • concluded there was atavistic form
  • concluded 40% of criminal acts committed by people with activistic features
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is the strength of the historical approach

A

MAJOR CONTRIBUTION TO CRIMINOLOGY
- changed the face of the study of crime
- it is credited as shifting crime research away from the moralistic discourse towards more scientific
- attempted to describe how certain people commit particular crimes
- credited as father of crim
- lead to beginning of offender profiling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the weaknesses of the historical approach

A

DESCRIMINATORY NATURE
- attention drawn to racist undertones
- many of the features identified as activistic were mostly found among those of African descent
- suggests africans are more likely to be offenders
- subject and influenced by racial prejudices of the time

POOR CONTROL
-failed to control important variables
- didn’t compare offenders to normal control groups[
- these may have also incr crime rates like poverty
- does not meet modern scientific standards

NATURE OR NURTURE
- raises question of whether criminals are born or made
- this approach suggests there is a biological cause and it is genetically determined
- however even if criminals have ativistic features does not mean this is the sole cause
- facial differences may be due to poverty and poor diet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what are the two genetic explanations for offending

A

TWIN AND ADOPTION STUDIES
- studied 3500 twin pairs in Denmark and found concordance rates for offender behaviour of 35% MZ and 13% DZ
- data indicates not just behaviour that is inherited but also traits

CANDIDATE GENES
- genetic analysis of 800 offenders suggested 2 genes may be associated with violent crime
- MAOA regulates seritonon in brain and has been linked with aggressive behaviour
- CDH13 linked with substance abuse and ADHD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what are the tow Neural explanations for offending

A

neural differences in brains of offenders and non offenders
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
- lots of brain imaging studies demonstrate that people with antisocial personalities have reduces activity in prefrontal cortex
- this part of brain regulates emotional behaviour
- 11% reduction in grey matter

MIRROR NEURONS
- only when offenders were asked to empathise did empathy reaction activate
- controlled by mirror neuron’s
- not totally without empathy
- can switch on and off

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what are the weaknesses of the biological approach to explaining offending behaviour

A

ISSUES WITH TWIN EVIDENCE
- assumption of equal environment
- assumed held constant as brought up together
- higher concordance rates for MZ than for DZ may simply be due to being treated more similarly

DETERMINIST
- suggests behaviour is determined by genetics and neural
- internal factors can not be controlled by the person
- idea that the person should not be held responsible for crime
- justice system is based on responsibility and free will
- complicates this principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what are the strengths of the bio approach to explanaing offending behaviour

A

SUPPORT FOR GENETICS
- study when neither bio or adoptive parents had convictions , 13.5% of adoptees did
- figure rose to 20% when bio parents had convictions then to 25% when both had
- shows genetic inheritance plays a role but so does environment too
- support for diathesis stress

BRAIN EVIDENCE
- support for link of frontal lobe and crime
- researchers looked at evidence of frontal lobe damage and antisocial behaviour
- people with damage - Impulsive behaviour, emotional instability and inability to learn from mistakes
- associated with planning ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what did Eysenck propose in his theory

A
  • behaviour could be represented along 2 dimensions ( introversion- extraversion) (neuroticism - stability)
  • dimensions combined form variety of personality characteristics and traits
  • later added psychoticism- sociability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what does the biological basis of eysencks explanation say
- traits are bio in origin and come out through the type of nervous system we inherit - criminal personality has an innate bio basis
26
what traits come with being an extravert, neurotic and psychotic
extravert- constant seek excitement, engage in risk taking behaviours, do not learn from mistakes neurotic- high level or reactivity in sympathetic NS, respond quickly in situation of threat, difficult to predict psychotic- high levels of testosterone, unemotional and prone to aggression
27
what sides of the scales create a criminal personality
- neurotic, extravert, psychotic
28
what is the role of socialisation in eysencks theory
- saw offending as developmentally immature - concerned with immediate gratification - with socialisation, children learn to be socially orientated - high E+N scores - difficult to teach and condition - less likely to learn to respond to antisocial impulses with anxiety
29
how can personality in terms of offending be measured
using questionaire
30
what is the strength of the Eysenck approach to offending behaviour
-support for criminal personality - compared prisoner scores with control - on measures of extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism - prisoners recorded higher average scores - agrees with predictions on 3 dimensions
31
what are the weaknesses of eysencks approach to offending behaviour
TOO SIMPLISTIC - idea all offending behaviour explained by personality traits - personality alone were poor prediction of how long offending would go on for - the environment is needed for reactions of these traits - more complex, interactionist better - test also too simplistic - personality not reductable to a score - too complex to be quantified CULTURAL FACTORS - in a study, hispanic and African offenders are less extravert than non offender group - Eysenck would have expected more - suggested this was due to diff culture - questions how far this can be generalised
32
what does the differential association theory propose and how does it work
- individuals learn values, attitudes, and techniques for offending behaviour through association and interaction with others - has a scientific bases and is explained in terms of social learning - learning often occurs most though interactions with person child values the most - suggests its possible to mathematically predict how likely an individual is to commit offences - need to know frequency, intensity and duration of the exposure - people are exposed to different attitudes, some pro crime and anti crime - if pro crime outweighs anti crime, will offend
33
how does differential association work in prisons
- socialisation - suntherlands theory shows why so many reoffend - when inside prison, learn tactics - may occur from observations or imitation
34
what are the strengths of differential association
SHIFT IN FOCUS - moved emphasis away from early theories eg atavistic - draws attention to idea that environment is more to blame than deviant people - offers realistic solution to offending WIDE REACH - can account for offending in all sectors of society - some offences clustered among affluent groups - white collar offences - middle class group share deviant norms - not just lower class and can explain all offences
35
what are the weaknesses of differential association
DETERMINISTIC- - states that if exposed to certain views and behaviours, will result in offending - not true and ignores that many chose to not offend despite influences DIFFICULT TO TEST - aimed to provide a scientific mathematical framework - hoped future offending could be predicted - many concepts not testable and can not be operationalised - eg how do you measure number of pro crime attitudes exposed to - does not have scientific credibility
36
what are the main parts of the cognitive explanation to offending behaviour
level of moral reasoning cognitive distortions eg hostile attribution bias minimalisation
37
what is the level of moral reasoning and how does it describe offending behaviour
- kolberg proposed that peoples decisions and judgement of right and wrong can be summarised in a stage theory of moral reasoning - based on theory of responses to moral dilemmas like the Heinz dilemma - offenders show lower moral reasoning - more likely to be classified as pre convectional level of the model - non offenders progress to convectional - preconvectional- the need to avoid punishment, child like reasoning, commit crime if they can get away - invidiuals who reason higher likely to empathise and exhibit honesty and generosity
38
what are the two main cognitive distortions associated with offending
- errors in information processing HOSTILE ATTRIBUTION BIAS - misinterpreting actions of others - assume others are being confrontational - may misread non aggressive cues like being looked at and have violent response MINIMALISATION - an attempt to deny or downplay seriousness of offence - eg may say they were rich anyways
39
what are the strengths of the cognitive approach to explaining offending
RESEARCH SUPPORT - evidence for link between moral reasoning and crime - compares reasoning of non offenders and offenders - used 11 moral dilemma questions - offender showed less moral reasoning -consistent with Kohlberg REAL WORLD APPLICATION - cog distortions have application in therapy - CBT aims to challenge irrational thinking - in this case encouraged to face up to what they have done - reduced denial is associated with lower reoffending - has practical value
40
what are weaknesses for the cognitive approach to explaining offending
TYPE OF OFFENCE - level of moral reasoning may depend on the crime - people who commit for financial gain more likely to show preconvectional than those convicted of impulsive crimes - kohl bergs theory may not apply to all forms of crime DESCRIPTIVE OR EXPLANITORY - cog theories are good at describing the criminal mind - may help reduce reofending - does not help predict future offending - just because someone has distorted thoughts doesn't mean will become an offender
41
what does the psychodynamic approach to explaining offending say about the role of the superego
faulty superego - superego works on morality principle - punishes ego through guilt - blackburn argued that if superego is not adequate then offending behaviour is inevitable WEAK AND UNDERDEVELOPED SUPEREGO -parent is absent in phallic stage and can not internalise formed superego - no opportunity for identification DEVIANT SUPEREGO - superego is immoral or has deviant values - leads to offending behaviour OVER HARSH SUPEREGO - overly harsh parenting leads to this - crippled by guilt and anxiety - drives individual to perform acts to satisfy need for punishment
42
what does the psychodynamic approach to explaining offending say about the theory of maternal deprivation
- bowlby argued that the ability to form meaningful relationships in adulthood was dependent on Childs relationship with mother figure - failure to establish relationship means child is likely to experience consequences - one is Development of personality type- affection less psychopathy - lack of guilt and empathy - more likely to offend and don't develop close relationships
43
what is the 44 thieves study
- though interviews - 14 of sample showed signs of affection less psychopathy - 12/14 had experienced maternal deprivation - concluded that affects of MD had caused affection less and delinquent behaviour among juvenile thieves
44
what is the strength of the psychodynamic approach to explaining offending
RESEARCH SUPPORT - support for link between offending and superego - research of 10 offenders and in all assessed, disturbances of superego formation diagnosed - each offender experienced unconscious feelings of guilt and punishment - supports role of psychic conflict as basis for offending
45
what are the weaknesses of the psychodynamic approach to explaining offending
NOT ALWAYS CORRECT - if theory was correct, this would state that all harsh parents raise guilty children with high levels of anxiety - instead parents tend to raise children who are more rebellious and not guilty - calls into question relationship between punitive parents and excessive feelings of guilt in child GENDER BIAS - freudian theory is gender biased - implicit assumption with Freuds theory that girls develop weaker superegos - due to identification with same gender parent not as strong as they do not experience castration anxiety - this implication suggest women more likely to offend and rates of imprisonment show the opposite - another study showed hardly any evidence of gender differences - alpha bias means may not be appropriate as explanation of offending behaviour
46
what are the 4 ways of dealing with offenders
- anger management - restorative justice - custodial sentencing - behavioural modification and token economy
47
how is anger management used as a way of dealing with offenders, what are the 3 aims and what are the 3 key steps
- form of CBT specific to changing a way a person manages anger - reduces anger in prisons - rehabilitation and reduction of reoffending- especially for violent offending Novaco- identified three aims for programme - cog restructuring- greater self awareness and control over cog dimensions of anger - regulation of arousal- controlling physiological state - behavioural strategies- problem solving skills 3 KEY STEPS- - cog preparation- clients learn about anger and how it can be adaptive and no adaptive and analyse own patterns of anger and identify situations which provoke anger in them -skill acquisition - client taught skills to help manage their anger eg self regulation relaxation and taught better communication skills - application training- apply skills initially in controlled and non threatening situation and receive feedback from therapist - later client can try out skills in real world
48
what is the strength of anger management
BETTER THAN BEHAVIOUR MODIFACATION - benefits may outlast those from BM - tries to tackle one of the causes of offending - looks at cog processes that trigger - behaviour modification only deals with surface - may give new insights into causes of criminality - 75% improvement rates so successful
49
what are the weaknesses of anger management
MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE AND EFFECTIVE - time consuming and expensive - requires trained therapist - not effective for long term - people drop out due to the difficulty - has no effectiveness when not persisted SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS - may portray themselves in a positive light - just want to seem as though improvements have been made - do this due to possibility of early release date - decrease effectiveness and evidence as may not be accurate
50
how is restorative justice used as a way of dealing with offenders and what are the aims
- brings those harmed by crime or conflict and those responsible for the harm into comunication - enables everyone affected by incident play a part in repairing harm and finding positive way forward - helps victim to recover and offender to rehabilitate - trained mediator supervises meeting - offenders voluntarily meet - can be face to face or via video call - survivor given opportunity to confront - focus on positive outcomes aims -REHABILITATION OF OFFENDERS - requires offender to be active ppt in process rather than passive and take responsibility for action -ATONEMENT FOR WRONGDOING- offenders may offer compensation or atone by showing genuine feelings pf guilt VICTIMS PERSPECTIVE- restores power of victim as voice is heard reports that this reduces feeling of being a victim and has helped them feel safe again
51
what are the strengths of restorative justice
EVIDENCE FOR SUCCESS -victims perspective- there is 85% satisfaction rate in face to face meetings with offenders - victims also have greater sense of satisfaction REDUCED OFFENDING - reviewed 20 studies of face to face meetings - all studies showed reduced reoffending - one study, reoffending rate was 11% compared to control 37% - overall figure of 14% reduction in rates
52
what are the weaknesses of restorative justice
ETHICAL ISSUES - can cause psychological harm to victim - contact with offender - may bring back memory and cause anxiety and stress - eg abusive relationship NOT ALWAYS SUITABLE - relies on good intent - offenders may not feel guilt but use the scheme to reduce sentence or even to come back in contact with victim - hard to test honesty - harder and not suitable for extreme crimes as may be too damaging for victim
53
what is custodial sentencing and what are the 4 main reasons for the used of it in dealing with offending
-involves a convicted offender spending time in prison or another closed institution 4 main reasons - DETERANCE- unpleasant experience puts individuals off engaging in offending behaviour ( social learning) -TO PROTECT PUBLIC- taken out of society and need for it is likely to depend on the severity of the crime and nature of offender - TO PUNISH OFFENDER- society enacting revenge for the offence by making person suffer and level of suffering should be proportionate to seriousness of crime - REHABILITATION- to prevent criminal behaviour, criminals must be educated and prison should provide opportunities to develop skills and training
54
what are the psychological affects of custodial sentencing
stress and depression - suicide rates are higher in prisons than in general pop - stress of prison increases risk of developing psychological disorders Institutionalisation- adapting to norms and routine of prison life may make unable to cope on the outside overcrowding and lack of privacy - may lead to stress and aggression
55
what is recidivism in custodial sentencing and what is the figure
- tells us to what extent prison acts as effective deterrent - hard to gain clear figures - 46% of adults reoffend within 1 year of release
56
what is the strength of custodial sentencing
PROVIDES TRAINING AND TREATMENT -rehabilitation -offenders may become better people during their time in prison -may be able to lead crime free life on the outside c -an access education and training increasing possibility of finding employment -offenders taking part in college programs are 43% less likely to reoffend following release.
57
what are the 3 weaknesses of custodial sentencing
ETHICAL ISSUES - negative psychological effects -can be brutal, demeaning and devastating - 119 people killed themselves in UK prisons in 2016 - 32% increase from year before -although convicts can be seen as inhumane it can cause more long-term impact. -However, some symptoms may have been present before. SCHOOL FOR CRIME -offenders may learn to become better offenders -skills that they acquire in their time in prison -may give younger inmates particular opportunities to learn tricks of the trade -may acquire criminal contacts EFFECTS ON FAMILY -children with a mother or father in prison or deeply affected financially and psychologically -parents in prison may feel guilt and separation anxiety from children or significant other
58
what is behaviour modification as a way to deal with offending and how does it work
- techniques are based on behaviourist principles of operant conditioning -both positive and negative reinforcement is used to encourage people to use certain behaviours and punishment to discourage -desirable behaviour- avoiding confrontation and following prison rules -Prisoners are given a token when they perform a desirable behaviour - Behaviours and rewards made clear to prisoner -non-compliance leads to tokens with held or removed. -Neutral stimulus is token. Unconditioned stimulus is reward condition stimulus is then the token -token is collected and exchanged for meaningful privileges like movies or meetings with family.
59
what is the research into behaviour modification in prisons
- Hobbs and holt observed token economy used in Alabama boys school for young offenders - Aim was to reduce inappropriate social behaviour before and after dinner lining up -staff given training 3×4 hours twice a week -identified and defined target behaviours -125 males observed lining in four areas one control line with no tokens -each day Boys told how many they had earned after being told criteria and how to earn them -every week could buy drinks, toys, cigarettes and visits -baseline of percentage of social behaviours before was 60 to 75% -after tokens 90 to 95% -control groups showed no increase
60
what is the strength of behaviour modification in prisons
EASY TO IMPLEMENT - no need for specialist professionals like in CBT or anger management -can be implemented by anyone and in any institution -cost, effective and easy to work once methods have been established
61
what are the weaknesses of behaviour modification in prisons
LITTLE REHABILATATIVE VALUE -may not affect long-term behaviour -Any positive change in behaviour that may occur whilst in prison may quickly be lost one released -no tokens or awards on outside -cognitive based treatment may be better -more likely to understand the cause of offending. ETHICAL ISSUES - have described behaviour modification as manipulative and dehumanising -obligatory and not optional -argues that withdrawal of privileges like exercise is unethical -Can't take away human rights as a form of combatting offending behaviour.